Seismic sensitivity evaluation of concrete buttress dams

Authors
S. Hosseini
M. Ahmadi
Abstract
Concrete buttress dams are constructed in large numbers at medium sites in many countries such as Iran because of their considerable technical and economical benefits in previous century. This type of dams is exposed to damages due to earthquakes as other structures. Some buttress dams such as Sefidroud dam in Iran, Hsinfengkiang dam in China and Honenike dam in Japan have undergone some damages due to recent earthquakes. After these incidents, some investigations have been carried out. However, these investigations have just mentioned the manner of incidents and the resulting damages. Therefore, the seismic behavior and sensitivity recognition of these dams with respect to different factors have been ignored; however the study of behavior and seismic sensitivity of this type of dams is important. In this paper, the tallest monolith of the Sefidroud concrete buttress dam is analyzed using a 3D model with massless foundation to study the seismic behavior and sensitivity of this type of dam. The interaction of the dam with the reservoir, the reservoir bottom absorption and upstream radiation of hydrodynamic waves are considered, but the cross-canyon component of earthquake is neglected. The applied accelerograms to the system are scaled according to the Sefidroud dam site DBE response spectrum. To determine the initial conditions before occurring earthquake, a series of detailed static analyses are done under the effect of dam body weight, hydrostatic pressure, uplift pressure and ambient temperature. Seismic loading due to longitudinal and vertical components of earthquake is applied and the nonlinear behavior of dam under various factors such as different seismic loading scenarios and different properties of dam body and also foundation materials is investigated. The results of analyses show that the dam body downstream kink, heel, toe and buttress web are sensitive and vulnerable zones. The results also demonstrate that the compressive stresses in the dam body are usually much less than the compressive strength of concrete. Therefore, the possibility of compressive failure is almost zero. But the conditions of tensile and shear stresses are different and large stresses may occur at the mentioned zones and considerable tensile and shear damages to the dam body are possible. According to the results of analyses, it is apparent that when the ratio of dam body modulus to that of the foundation (called softness modulus) is small, i.e. when the foundation modulus is high and near to that of dam body, the construction of concrete buttress dams at highly seismic zones may cause local failure and unfavorable situations for the tensile stresses at the kink, the heel and the toe of the dam body. Therefore, adaptation of this dam type in such sites should be carefully studied and in these circumstances, the modulus of the concrete of dam body should be kept more than usual practice. Furthermore, the shear damage at the dam-foundation contact surface is highly dependent to the applied earthquake type, but increasing the softness modulus could reduce this type of damage. The compressive strength of concrete has no effect on the shear damage at the dam-foundation contact surface.

Keywords

Thomas, Henry H., “The engineering of large dams”,
Wiley, 1979.
[2] Schnitter, Nicholas J., “A history of dams: the useful
pyramids”, A.A. Balkema, 1994.
[3] “Lessons from dam incidents”, ICOLD, 1974.
[4] Ahmadi,M.T., Khoshrang, Gh., Mokhtarzadeh, A. &
Jalalzadeh, A., “Behaviour of a large concrete dam due
to an actual maximum credible earthquake”,
Earthquake Engineering, Tenth World Conference,
Balkema, Rotterdam, 1992, pp. 3995-4000.
[5] Ahmadi, M.T. & Khoshrang, Gh., “SefidRud dam’s
dynamic response to the large near-field earthquake of
June 1990”, Dam Engineering, vol.3, Issue 2, 1992.
[6] W.Indermaur, R.P.Brenner & T.Arasteh, “The effects
of 1990 Manjil earthquake on SefidRud buttress dam”,
Dam Engineering, vol.2, Issue 4, 1992.
[7] Ghaemmaghami, A.R. & Ghaemian, M.,
“Experimental seismic investigation of Sefid-rud
concrete buttress dam model on shaking table”,
Earthquake Engineering and structural dynamics,
vol.37, 2008, pp. 809–823.
[8] Ghaemmaghami, A.R. & Ghaemian, M., “Short
communication: Shaking table test on small-scale
retrofitted model of Sefid-rud concrete buttress dam”,
Earthquake Engineering and structural dynamics,
vol.39, 2010, pp. 109–118.
[9] “Numerical Models for Seismic Evaluation of
Concrete Dams, Review, Evaluation and Interpretation
of Results”, USSD, November 2008.
10 ]
ذاکری، میرمنصور و احمدی، محمدتقی، "شناسایی ]
ماهیت ترک پایه ی
18 سد سفیدرود "، چهارمین
.
کنفرانس سدسازی، دی 1379
11 ]
احمدی، محمدتقی و قره باغی، بهرام، "روش نوین ]
تحلیل اندرکنش دینامیکی سد و مخزن به روش اویلر
-
لاگرانژی
"، مؤسسه ی بین المللی زلزله شناسی و مهندسی
.
زلزله، پروژه ی تحقیقاتی شماره 114 ، شهریور 1372
12 ]
"مطالعات طرح ترمیم سد سفیدرود، گزارش ]
لرزه خیزی و خطر زمین لرزه در ساختگاه سد
سفیدرود
"، شرکت توسعه ی منابع آب و نیروی ایران
. (
آب و نیرو)، شهریور 1370
[13] “State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength
Concrete”, ACI Committee 363, Reapproved 1997.
[14] Nemati, K.M., P.Gardoni & T.Noguchi, “On
Modulus of Elasticity of High-Strength Concrete”,
International Conference on Construction and
Building Technology (ICCBT), pp. 159-172, 2008.
[15] Chen, W.F. & Han, D.J.,” Plasticity for Structural
Engineers”, Springer-Verlag, USA, 1988.
[16] Ghanaat , Yusof, “Failure modes approach to safety
evaluation of dams”, 13th world conference of
earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper
no. 1115, 2004.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 14, Issue 2
July and August 2014
Pages 55-66