Laboratory evaluation of the properties of eco-friendly four-component concretes containing silica fume, glass powder and ground granulated blast furnace slag

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Master of Civil Engineering in Construction Management, Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch
2 Master student in structural engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Jiroft
4 R&D Manager of Kerman Traffic Engineering Company
Abstract
Nowadays, concrete is used as a widely used material in different industries. Depending on the usage of concrete, different properties can be expected from it. Plentiful usage of concrete in other industries such as bridge construction, landscaping, construction, harbors, docks, and special structures has made this valuable material the center of attention of many researchers. Depending on the type and place of using concrete, this material has limitations and problems. Destruction of concrete in the long term is one of the factors causing damage to the industrial cycle and economy of countries. The high durability and reliability of concrete reduce damage to the environment and increase the service life of structures. Important factors are the useful life of concrete structures, environmental conditions, and concrete quality. The attack of sulfates on concrete is one of the critical factors in reducing the life of the structure and the durability of concrete. Sodium, magnesium, and calcium sulfates are salts usually found in soils and groundwater and react with different phases of hydrated cement paste, such as hydrated alumina, hydrated monosulfate, and calcium hydroxide, to produce needle-shaped crystals of ettringite and calcium sulfate (gypsum). The volume of these crystals is greater than the volume of cement hydration products, so they cause internal stress and cracking in hardened concrete. Magnesium sulfate is more damaging than other sulfates because it destroys calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H). In the attack of magnesium sulfate and the conversion of Ca(OH)2 to gypsum, it is accompanied by the simultaneous formation of Mg(OH)2 (brucite), which is insoluble and reduces the alkalinity of the system. In the absence of hydroxyl ions in the pore solution, the stability of C-S-H in the system is reduced and attacked by the sulfate solution. The ultimate product of this substitution reaction is the magnesium silicate hydrate, the formation of which is associated with the loss of the cementitious characteristic. Permeability and porosity are the most critical factors in increasing the resistance of concrete against sulfate attack. This study evaluated weight and compressive strength changes after placing in magnesium sulfate solution for six designs of concrete mixes containing silica fume, glass powder, and steel slag. In addition, the depth of water penetration under pressure and water absorption tests were performed to evaluate the permeability of concrete. The results showed the proper performance of glass powder and steel slag against magnesium sulfate attack and reduced the depth of water penetration. Changes in the weight and compressive strength of concrete against magnesium sulfate attack depend on the properties of supplementary cementitious materials, their replacement amount, and concrete porosity.



Keywords

Subjects


[1] Tkaczewska, E. Effect of size fraction and glass structure of siliceous fly ashes on fly ash cement hydration, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 315-321, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.03.032.
[2] Gołek, Ł. Glass powder and high-calcium fly ash based binders – Long term examinations, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 220, Pages 493-506, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.095.
[3] Dabrowski, M. and Glinicki, M. A. Influence of aggregate type on the durability of concrete made of blended cements with calcerous fly ash, Editor(s): A.M. Brandt, J. Olek, M.A. Glinicki, C.K.Y. Leung, Brittle Matrix Composites 10, Woodhead Publishing, Pages 305-313, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099891.305.
[4] Li, G., Zhang, A., Song, Zh., Liu, Sh., Zhang, J., Ground granulated blast furnace slag effect on the durability of ternary cementitious system exposed to combined attack of chloride and sulfate, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 158, Pages 640-648, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.062.
[5] Ghorab, H.Y., Rizk, M., Meawad, A.S., El Sayed M., Reporting the performance of the rice straw ash as cement replacement material, Cem. Wapno Bet. 23, 107–114, 2018.
[6] Camiletti, J., Soliman, A.M., Nehdi, M.L. Effects of nano- and micro-limestone addition on early-age properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. Mater Struct 46, 881–898 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9940-0.
[7] Siddique, R., Jameel, A., Singh, M., Barnat-Hunek, D., Kunal, Aït-Mokhtar, A., Belarbi, R., Rajor, A., Effect of bacteria on strength, permeation characteristics and micro-structure of silica fume concrete, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 142, Pages 92-100, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.057.
[8] Horszczaruk, E., Role of nanosilica in the formation of the properties of cement composites, state of the art, Cem. Wapno Bet. 23, 487–495, 2018.
[9] Ding, J.T., Li, Z., Effects of metakaolin and silica fume on properties of concrete, ACI materials journal, v. 99, (4), JUL-AUG, p. 393-398, 2002, http://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/23320.
[10] Gołek, Ł., Kapeluszna, E., Rzepa, Investigations of the glass activity in municipal and special incinerating plants waste, Cem. Wapno Bet. 22, 79–91, 2017.
[11] Andrew, R.M., Global CO2 emissions from cement production, Earth Syst. Sci. Data.10, 195–217. 2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018.
[12] Giergiczny, Z., The hydraulic activity of high calcium fly Ash, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 83, 227–232, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-6970-7.
[13] Neville, A., Ajdukiewicz, A., Degler, A., Neville, A. M., Właściwości betonu; wyd. 4 w 2000 r. z jęz. ang. tł. Andrzej Ajdukiewicz, Andrzej Degler, Janusz Kasperkiewicz ; red. nauk. i uzup. tł. wyd. 5, Andrzej Ajdukiewicz, 2012.
[14] Markiv, T., Sobol, K., Franus, M., Franus, W., Mechanical and durability properties of concretes incorporating natural zeolite, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 16, 554–562, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2016.03.013.
[15] Al-Akhras, N.M., Durability of metakaolin concrete to sulfate attack, Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 1727–1734, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.026.
[16] Wongkeo, W., Thongsanitgarn, P., Ngamjarurojana, A., Chaipanich, A., Compressive strength and chloride resistance of self-compacting concrete containing high level fly ash and silica fume, Mater. Des. 64, 261–269. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.042.
[17] Baquerizo, L.G., Matschei, T., Scrivener, K.L., Saeidpour, M., Wadsö, L., Hydration states of Afm cement phases, Cem. Concr. Res. 73, 143–157, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.011.
[18] Birnin-Yauri, U.A., Glasser, F.P., Friedel’s salt, Ca2Al(OH)6(Cl, OH)·2H2O: Its solid solutions and their role in chloride binding, Cem. Concr. Res. 28, 1713–1723, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00162-8.
[19] Suryavanshi, A.K., Scantlebury, J.D., Lyon, S.B., Mechanism of Friedel’s salt formation in cements rich in tri-calcium aluminate، Cem. Concr. Res. 26, 717–727, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(96)85009-5.
[20] Paul, G., Boccaleri, E., Buzzi, L., Canonico, F., Gastaldi, D., Friedel’s salt formation in sulfoaluminate cements: A combined XRD and27Al MAS NMR study, Cem. Concr. Res. 67, 93–102, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.08.004.
[21] Bube, C., Metz, V., Bohnert, E., Garbev, K., Schild, D., Kienzler, B., Long-term cement corrosion in chloride-rich solutions relevant to radioactive waste disposal in rock salt –Leaching experiments and thermodynamic simulations, Phys. Chem. Earth, PartsA/B/C. 64, 87–94, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2012.11.001.
[22] Merida, A., Kharchi, F., Pozzolan Concrete Durability on Sulphate Attack, Procedia Engineering, Volume 114, Pages 832-837, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.035.
[23] Gollop, R.S., Taylor, H.F.W., Microstructural and microanalytical studies of sulfate attack. Ii. Sulfate-resisting portland cement: Ferrite composition and hydration, chemistry، in: Blue Circ. Ind. PLC Tech. Centre, 305 London Road Greenhithe, Kent, DA9 9JQ, UK: pp. 1347–1358, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90120-1.
[24] Mehta, P.K., Sulfate attack in marine environment, Am. Ceram. Soc. INC, Mater. Sci. Concr. Sulfate Attack Mech. 295–299, 1999.
[25] Ghrici, M., Kenai, S., Said-Mansour, M., Mechanical properties and durability of mortar and concrete containing natural pozzolana and limestone blended cements, Cem. Concr. Compos. 29, 542–549, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.009.
[26] Torii, K., Mitsunori, K., Effects of fly ash and silica fume on the resistance of mortar to sulfuric acid and sulfate attack, Cem. Concr. Res. 24, 361–370, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90063-9.
[27] Roy, D.M., Arjunan, P., Silsbee, M.R., Effect of silica fume, metakaolin, and low-calcium fly ash on chemical resistance of concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 1809-1813, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00548-8.
[28] Samimi, K., Kamali-Bernard, S., Maghsoudi, A. A., Maghsoudi, M., Siad, H., Influence of pumice and zeolite on compressive strength, transport properties and resistance to chloride penetration of high strength self-compacting concretes, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 151, Pages 292-311, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.071.
[29] Elahi, M.M.A., Shearer, Ch.R., Rashid Reza, A.N., Saha, A.K., Newaz Khan, M.N., Hossain, M.M., Sarker, P.K., Improving the sulfate attack resistance of concrete by using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs): A review, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 281, 122628, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122628.
[30] ASTM (2020) C1240-20: Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures, ASTM International، West Conshohocken، PA، USA، http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C1240-20.
[31] ASTM (2018) C989/C989M-18a: Standard Specification for Slag Cement for Use in Concrete and Mortars، ASTM International، West Conshohocken، PA، USA، http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C989C989M-18a.
[32] ASTM (2019) C618-19: Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C618-19.
[33] ASTM (2015) C127-15: Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C127-15.
[34] [ASTM (2015) C128-15: Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C128-15.
[35] ASTM (2018) C33/C33M-18: Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C33C33M-18.
[36] ASTM (2019) C494/C494M-19: Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C494C494M-19.
[37] BSI (2019) EN 12390-2:2019. Testing hardened concrete. Making and curing specimens for strength tests. BSI, London, UK.
[38] BSI (2019) EN 12390-3:2019. Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. BSI, London, UK.
[39] BSI (2011) BS 1881-122:2011. Testing concrete. Method for determination of water absorption. BSI, London, UK.
[40] BSI (2019) EN 12390-8:2019. Testing hardened concrete. Depth of penetration of water under pressure. BSI, London, UK.
[41] Mehta PK and Monteiro PJM (2013) Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, Page 44, McGraw-Hill Education, ISBN 9780071797870.