Investigation of Top-Down Cracking in Asphalt Pavements Using FEM

Authors
H. Taherkhani
M. Jalali Jirandehi
Abstract
Top-down cracking (TDC) is among the major forms of asphaltic pavement distresses that significantly affects the serviceability and development of structural failure. Interaction of tire and pavement interaction plays a key role in the initiation of TDC. This study utilizes viscoelastic analysis using finite element modeling to evaluate the influence of axle loads and tire types on the top down cracking in asphaltic pavements. The effect of three axle loads of 5, 8.2 and 15 ton and two tire configurations (conventional dual tire assembly and super single tire) on TDC in Geogrid reinforced and unreinforced pavements has been investigated. The results show that under axle load of 5 and 8.2 ton top down cracking occurs, initialy at the inner edges of the tires, while under axle load of 15 ton its occurence between the tires is sooner than the other zones. Among bottom-up cracking (BUC) and TDC, BUC is more sensitive to the variations of tire type. The study also indicates that the reinforcement of pavement using geogrid at the bottom of asphalt layer is more effective on the bottom up cracking than on the top down cracking. By comparison, the super single tire was shown to create more TDC damage ratio than the dual tires assembly in both reinforced and unreinforced pavements.
Top-down cracking (TDC) is among the major forms of asphaltic pavement distresses that significantly affects the serviceability and development of structural failure. Interaction of tire and pavement interaction plays a key role in the initiation of TDC. This study utilizes viscoelastic analysis using finite element modeling to evaluate the influence of axle loads and tire types on the top down cracking in asphaltic pavements. The effect of three axle loads of 5, 8.2 and 15 ton and two tire configurations (conventional dual tire assembly and super single tire) on TDC in Geogrid reinforced and unreinforced pavements has been investigated. The results show that under axle load of 5 and 8.2 ton top down cracking occurs, initialy at the inner edges of the tires, while under axle load of 15 ton its occurence between the tires is sooner than the other zones. Among bottom-up cracking (BUC) and TDC, BUC is more sensitive to the variations of tire type. The study also indicates that the reinforcement of pavement using geogrid at the bottom of asphalt layer is more effective on the bottom up cracking than on the top down cracking. By comparison, the super single tire was shown to create more TDC damage ratio than the dual tires assembly in both reinforced and unreinforced pavements.
Top-down cracking (TDC) is among the major forms of asphaltic pavement distresses that significantly affects the serviceability and development of structural failure. Interaction of tire and pavement interaction plays a key role in the initiation of TDC. This study utilizes viscoelastic analysis using finite element modeling to evaluate the influence of axle loads and tire types on the top down cracking in asphaltic pavements. The effect of three axle loads of 5, 8.2 and 15 ton and two tire configurations (conventional dual tire assembly and super single tire) on TDC in Geogrid reinforced and unreinforced pavements has been investigated. The results show that under axle load of 5 and 8.2 ton top down cracking occurs, initialy at the inner edges of the tires, while under axle load of 15 ton its occurence between the tires is sooner than the other zones. Among bottom-up cracking (BUC) and TDC, BUC is more sensitive to the variations of tire type. The study also indicates that the reinforcement of pavement using geogrid at the bottom of asphalt layer is more effective on the bottom up cracking than on the top down cracking. By comparison, the super single tire was shown to create more TDC damage ratio than the dual tires assembly in both reinforced and unreinforced pavements.

Keywords

[1] Miao, Y., He, T.G., Yang, Q. & Zheng, J.J., 2010. Multi-domain hybrid boundary node method for evaluating top-down crack in Asphalt pavements, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 34 (9), 755-760.
[2] Zou, J., Roque, R., Chun, S. & Lopp, G., 2013. Long-term field evaluation and analysis of top-down cracking for Superpave projects, Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (4),  831-846.
[3] Svasdisant, T., Schorsch, M., Baladi, G.Y. & Pinyosunun, S. 2002. Mechanistic Analysis of Top-Down Cracks in Asphalt Pavements, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1809,  126-136.
[4] Dinegdae, Y.H., Onifade, I., Jelagin, D. & Birgisson, B. 2015 Mechanics-based top-down fatigue cracking initiation prediction framework for asphalt pavements, Road Materials and Pavement Design, DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2015.1055335, 1-21.
[5] Uhlmeyer, J.S., Willoughby, K., Pierce, L.M. & Mahoney, J.P. 2000 Top-Down Cracking in Washington State Asphalt Concrete Wearing Courses, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1730, 110-116.
[6] Wang, G. 2009 Effects of Truck Tire Type and Tire-Pavement Interaction on Top-Down Cracking and Instability Rutting. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, USA.
[7] Zhao, Y., Tan, Y. & Zhou, C. 2012 Determination of axle load spectra based on percentage of overloaded trucks for mechanisticempirical pavement design., Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13(4), 850-863.
[8] Sun, L. & Duan, Y. 2013 Dynamic response of top-down cracked asphalt concrete pavement under a half-sinusoidal impact load., Acta Mechanica, 224 (8), 1865-1877.
[9] Hu, X. & Walubita, L. F. 2009 Modelling Tensile Strain Response in Asphalt Pavements., Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10 (1), 125-154.
[10] Wang, G. & Roque, R. 2011 Impact of Wide-Based Tires on the Near- Surface Pavement Stress States Based on Three Dimensional Tire Pavement Interaction Model., Road Materials and Pavement Design, 12 (3), 639-662.
[11] Chunhua, H. 2009 Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Top-Down Cracking for Asphalt Pavements., Second International Conference on Transportation Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
[12] Yongjie, L., Shaopu, Y. & Jianxi, W. 2014 Research on pavement longitudinal crack propagation under non-uniform vehicle loading., Engineering Failure Analysis, 42, 22-31.
[13] Al-Qadi, I. L. & Wang, H. 2009 Full-depth Pavement Responses under Various Tire Configurations: Accelerated Pavement Testing and Finite Element Modeling., Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 78,  721-760.
[14] Zhao, Y., Zhou, C., Zeng, W. & Ni, Y. 2015 Accurate determination of near-surface responses of asphalt pavements., Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (1), 186-199.
[15] Greene, J., Toros, U., Kim, S., Byron, T. & Choubane, B. 2010 Impact of Wide-Base Single Tires on Pavement Damage. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2155,  82-90.
[16] Kim, J., Roque, R. & Byron, T. 2009 Viscoelastic Analysis of Flexible Pavements and Its Effects on Top-Down Cracking., Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21 (7),  324-332.
[17] Taherkhani, H., Moradloo, A. J. & Jalali Jirandehi, M. 2015 Investigating the effects of type and position of geosynthetic on the responses of asphaltic pavements using viscoelastic analysis by finite elements method., Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Iran (In Persian).
 [18] Kim, D. 2008 Super-single tire loadings and their impacts on pavement design., Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35 (2), 119-128.
[19] Al-Qadi, I.L., Elseifi, M. & Yoo, P. J. 2004 Pavement Damage Due to Different Tires and Vehicle Configuration., Final Report Submitted to Michelin Americas Research and Development Corporation.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 17, Issue 1
May and June 2017
Pages 127-135