Evaluation of retrofit Methods for Concrete Slabs Against Blast Loads to Avoid Brittle damage

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
S. A. Hosseini 1
A. Gandomkar Josheghani 2
T. Amin Taheri 2
1 Assistant Professor of Malik Ashtar University of Technology
2 -
Abstract
Concrete slabs subjected to near-field explosion loading often fail in a brittle manner. Common failure types include spalling and scabbing. Brittle failure leads to an inflexible and brittle structural response, producing small and large fragments that can be extremely dangerous due to their high velocities. Therefore, designing concrete slabs for explosive loading requires methods that either prevent or mitigate brittle failures or transform them into ductile failures. This study validates numerical models using LS-DYNA finite element software and compares them with reputable research. Simulations of concrete slabs were conducted using conventional methods, reinforced concrete slabs with steel plates, reinforced concrete slabs with wire mesh, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) slabs. The analysis of five slab types under similar explosion loading reveals that UHPC slabs exhibit less deflection and damage compared to other types, while conventional concrete slabs experience greater deflection and damage. The optimal reduction in damage for reinforced concrete slabs occurs when a steel plate measuring 2 by 4.2 meters and 0.5 centimeters thick is applied to the backside. Additionally, using wire mesh dimensions 25% larger than the initial slab damage yields the best performance. A comparative analysis of explosion-induced damage across different slab types indicates that reinforced concrete slabs with a 0.5-centimeter thick steel plate exhibit the largest damage area (8m2); whereas UHPC slabs show no damage, resulting in the smallest damage area. Further investigations into the dynamic response of these slabs demonstrate that advanced materials and reinforcement techniques significantly enhance their resilience against explosive forces. This study emphasizes the importance of innovative design strategies in civil engineering, highlighting that the adoption of UHPC slab minimizes structural damage and improves safety in high-risk environments. These findings underscore the necessity of incorporating modern materials and methodologies in protective structure design, ensuring better performance and longevity under extreme loading conditions. A comparative analysis of various methods for strengthening concrete slabs using identical materials shows that UHPC slabs outperform others in reducing deflection and failure. This illustrates their exceptional ability to withstand explosive dynamic loads. However, the primary limitation of UHPC slabs is their high cost and complexity of implementation. Reinforcement with steel sheets has proven more effective than wire mesh in minimizing deflection. In models reinforced with 0.5 cm steel sheets, deflection was reduced by 50% compared to conventional concrete slabs. The slabs reinforced with wire mesh demonstrated a significant decrease in failure rates compared to conventional slabs, with reductions ranging from 75% to 80% across various reinforcement methods using the same materials. Conversely, some models reinforced with steel sheets exhibited increased failure rates. The findings indicate that, in most cases, slabs with greater flexibility, such as those reinforced with wire mesh, sustained less damage. This can be attributed to the enhanced flexibility and ductility of wire mesh-reinforced slabs compared to those reinforced with steel sheets.

Concrete slabs subjected to near-field explosion loading often fail in a brittle manner. Common failure types include spalling and scabbing. Brittle failure leads to an inflexible and brittle structural response, producing small and large fragments that can be extremely dangerous due to their high velocities. Therefore, designing concrete slabs for explosive loading requires methods that either prevent or mitigate brittle failures or transform them into ductile failures. This study validates numerical models using LS-DYNA finite element software and compares them with reputable research. Simulations of concrete slabs were conducted using conventional methods, reinforced concrete slabs with steel plates, reinforced concrete slabs with wire mesh, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) slabs. The analysis of five slab types under similar explosion loading reveals that UHPC slabs exhibit less deflection and damage compared to other types, while conventional concrete slabs experience greater deflection and damage. The optimal reduction in damage for reinforced concrete slabs occurs when a steel plate measuring 2 by 4.2 meters and 0.5 centimeters thick is applied to the backside. Additionally, using wire mesh dimensions 25% larger than the initial slab damage yields the best performance. A comparative analysis of explosion-induced damage across different slab types indicates that reinforced concrete slabs with a 0.5-centimeter thick steel plate exhibit the largest damage area (8m2); whereas UHPC slabs show no damage, resulting in the smallest damage area. Further investigations into the dynamic response of these slabs demonstrate that advanced materials and reinforcement techniques significantly enhance their resilience against explosive forces. This study emphasizes the importance of innovative design strategies in civil engineering, highlighting that the adoption of UHPC slab minimizes structural damage and improves safety in high-risk environments. These findings underscore the necessity of incorporating modern materials and methodologies in protective structure design, ensuring better performance and longevity under extreme loading conditions. A comparative analysis of various methods for strengthening concrete slabs using identical materials shows that UHPC slabs outperform others in reducing deflection and failure. This illustrates their exceptional ability to withstand explosive dynamic loads. However, the primary limitation of UHPC slabs is their high cost and complexity of implementation. Reinforcement with steel sheets has proven more effective than wire mesh in minimizing deflection. In models reinforced with 0.5 cm steel sheets, deflection was reduced by 50% compared to conventional concrete slabs. The slabs reinforced with wire mesh demonstrated a significant decrease in failure rates compared to conventional slabs, with reductions ranging from 75% to 80% across various reinforcement methods using the same materials. Conversely, some models reinforced with steel sheets exhibited increased failure rates. The findings indicate that, in most cases, slabs with greater flexibility, such as those reinforced with wire mesh, sustained less damage. This can be attributed to the enhanced flexibility and ductility of wire mesh-reinforced slabs compared to those reinforced with steel sheets.


Keywords

Subjects

[1]S. Yao, D. Zhang, X. Chen, F. Lu, and W. Wang, “Experimental and numerical study on the dynamic response of RC slabs under blast loading,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 66, pp. 120–129, 2016.
[2]Liu, J., Peng, Y., Xu, S., Yuan, P., Qu, K., Yu, X., ... & Su, Y. (2022). Investigation of geopolymer-based ultra-high performance concrete slabs against contact explosions. Construction and Building Materials, 315, 125727.‌
[3]Zhu, W., Xiao, Y., Yu, J., Jia, J., & Li, Z. (2024). Damage modes and mechanism of steel-concrete composite bridge slabs under contact explosion. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 212, 108223.‌
[4]Solahuddin, B. A., & Yahaya, F. M. (2023). A state-of-the-art review on experimental investigation and finite element analysis on structural behaviour of fibre reinforced polymer reinforced concrete beams. Heliyon, 9(3).‌
[5] B. Luccioni et al., “Effect of steel fibers on static and blast response of high strength concrete,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 107, pp. 23–37, 2017
[6] M. Oña, G. Morales-Alonso, F. Gálvez, V. Sánchez-Gálvez, and D. Cendón, “Analysis of concrete targets with different kinds of reinforcements subjected to blast loading,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 265–282, 2016.
[7] J. Li, C. Wu, and H. Hao, “Investigation of ultra-high performance concrete slab and normal strength concrete slab under contact explosion,” Eng. Struct., vol. 102, pp. 395–408, 2015..
[8] Tran, D. T., Pham, T. M., Hao, H., San Ha, N., Vo, N. H., & Chen, W. (2023). Precast segmental beams made of fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete and FRP tendons against impact loads. Engineering Structures, 295, 116862.‌
[9]Wang, W., Huo, Q., Yang, J. C., Wang, J. H., & Wang, X. (2023). Experimental investigation of ultra-early-strength cement-based self-compacting high strength concrete slabs (URCS) under contact explosions. Defence Technology, 24, 326-339.‌
[10] Zhao, X., Sun, J., Zhao, H., Jia, Y., Fang, H., Wang, J.,... & Wei, D. (2024, March). Experimental and mesoscopic modeling numerical researches on steel fiber reinforced concrete slabs under contact explosion. In Structures (Vol. 61, p. 106114). Elsevier. LSTC, Keyword User ’ S Manual Volume Ii, vol. II. 2011.
[11] Zhu, W., Xiao, Y., Yu, J., Jia, J., & Li, Z. (2024). Damage modes and mechanism of steel-concrete composite bridge slabs under contact explosion. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 212, 108223.‌
[12] Gao, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Li, S., Wei, W., & Huang, C. (2024, May). Study on the failure effect of aramid reinforced concrete slab under localized blast loading. In Structures (Vol. 63, p. 106292). Elsevier.‌
[13]Chen, D., Wu, H., & Cheng, Y. (2024). Dynamic behaviors of unreinforced and spray polyurea retrofitted brick masonry infill walls under blast loads: Shock tube test and analyses. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 190, 104975.‌
[14] Li, C., & Aoude, H. (2024). Effects of UHPFRC jacketing and axial loading on the blast behaviour of reinforced concrete beams and columns. Journal of Building Engineering, 84, 108416.‌
[15] Gangolu, J., Kishore, K. B., & Sharma, H. (2023). Probabilistic demand models and reliability based code calibration for reinforced concrete column and beam subjected to blast loading. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 240, 109577.‌
[16] Ma, L. L., Wu, H., & Fang, Q. (2023). A unified performance-based blast-resistant design approach for RC beams/columns. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 173, 104459.‌
[17] Kishore, K. B., Gangolu, J., Ramancha, M. K., Bhuyan, K., & Sharma, H. (2022). Performance-based probabilistic deflection capacity models and fragility estimation for reinforced concrete column and beam subjected to blast loading. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 227, 108729.‌
[18] Shi, Y., Wang, N., Cui, J., Li, C., & Zhang, X. (2022). Experimental and numerical investigation of charge shape effect on blast load induced by near-field explosions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 165, 266-277.‌
[19] Wu, J., Liu, Z., Yu, J., & Xu, S. (2022). Experimental and numerical investigation of normal reinforced concrete panel strengthened with polyurea under near-field explosion. Journal of Building Engineering, 46, 103763.‌
[20] Zhang, Y. X., Chilvers, J., Yang, L., & Lin, X. (2022). Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Hybrid-Fibre Engineered Cementitious Composite Panels Under Contact Explosions.‌
[21] Zhao, C., Zhang, L., He, K., Chen, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Experimental and numerical study on the blast resistance of C-shaped doubled steel concrete slab (C-DSCS) with L-shaped connectors. Engineering Structures, 295, 116900.‌
[22]Mejía, N., Peralta, R., Tapia, R., Durán, R., & Sarango, A. (2022). Damage assessment of RC columns under the combined effects of contact explosion and axial loads by experimental and numerical investigations. Engineering Structures, 254, 113776.‌
[23] ufc 3-340-02-12052008
[24]Jacek Tejchman & Jerzy Bobiński.(2013). Continuous and Discontinuous Modelling of Fracture in Concrete Using FEM.
[25] Marta Słowik,(2018). The analysis of failure in concrete and reinforced concrete beams with different reinforcement ratio. Volume 89, pages 885–895.
[26] J. Li, C. Wu, and H. Hao, “Investigation of ultra-high performance concrete slab and normal strength concrete slab under contact explosion,” Eng. Struct., vol. 102, pp. 395–408, 2015.
[27] R. Castedo, P. Segarra, A. Alañon, L. M. Lopez, A. P. Santos, and J. A. Sanchidrian, “Air blast resistance of full-scale slabs with different compositions: Numerical modeling and field validation,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 86, pp. 145–156, 2015.
[28] J. Li, C. Wu, H. Hao, and Y. Su, “Experimental and numerical study on steel wire mesh reinforced concrete slab under contact explosion,” Mater. Des., vol. 116, pp. 77–91, 2017.
[29] J. Li, C. Wu, and H. Hao, “Investigation of ultra-high performance concrete slab and normal strength concrete slab under contact explosion,” Eng. Struct., vol. 102, pp. 395–408, 2015.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 25, Issue 6 - Serial Number 86
September and October 2025