Evaluation of the effects of processed crumb rubber on deformation resistance of asphalt mixes

Document Type : Original Research

Author
Professor
Abstract
Pavement distresses are the major concern in asphalt pavement industry. Permanent deformation is one of the most common types of pavement distresses. This kind of distress which is caused by repeated traffic loading at high temperatures appears mainly in upper layers of asphalt pavements in form of longitudinal depressions in wheel paths and small changes on the sides of the wheel paths. This phenomena not only leads to pavement structural failure, but it results in reduced service life of pavements and affects safety of road users. Over the past decades, pavement researchers have taken different approaches to improve rheological properties of bitumen and promote performance of asphalt mixtures. Application of additives such as Crumb Rubber (CR) in asphalt layers is one of the most economic approaches that results also is reduced environmental pollution. Crumb Rubber has been experienced in asphalt mixtures as an effective modifier for several decades. Despite numerous advantages of the application of crumb rubber in asphalt mixtures, there is still no extensive use of it in road pavements worldwide. This might be related to problems such as increased production cost of Crumb Rubber Modified (CRM) mixes, early aging due to high temperature at mixing and laying down faces and eventual coagulation of rubber particles in mixes, as well as phase separation of the CRM modified binder. In order to overcome the above mentioned negative issue, one of the latest methods of CRM modified mix Production is the application of Processed Crumb Rubber (PCR) instead of the application of commonly methods of wet processing. This type of crumb rubber is a combination of fine rubber powder, soft bitumen, minerals and hydrated lime, which are mixed in a short time processing. Processed crumb rubber can easily be added to asphalt mixes in dry mode mixing and improves performance of asphalt mixes. Lower Processed crumb rubber -Bitumen mixing time reduces problems of coagulation of rubber particles and have several advantages. Due to the fact that the Processed Crumb Rubber approach is relatively new, it is necessary to carry out comprehensive laboratory research works in order to evaluate characteristics of bitumen and performance of asphalt mixtures. In this research, rutting resistance of Crumb Rubber and Processed Crumb Rubber modified asphalt mixtures of a dense and a gap graded mix was evaluated. With this regard, Marshall Mix Design was modified in order to use the Processed Crumb Rubber in dry method. Hamburg Wheel-Track and repeated axial load tests were carried out to investigate rutting resistance of the modified mixes. Hamburg Wheel-Track test was performed in dry and saturated conditions and repeated axial load was assessed under stresses of 150 kPa and 300 kPa. The results were compared on samples containing conventional bitumen and wet processed crumb rubber. Although, the results showed that using both crumb rubber additives increased resistance of mixes against rutting, samples contains 25% Processed Crumb Rubber showed the highest resistance against permanent deformation. Moreover, application of Processed Crumb Rubber in stone mastic asphalt mixes showed superior performance against permanent deformation due to better stone to stone contact and higher amounts of Processed Crumb Rubber bitumen in mixes.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] Xu T., Huang X. 2012, Investigation into Causes of in-place Rutting in Asphalt Pavement, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 28(1): 525–530.
[2] Zhang Y. 2012, Anisotropic Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures in Compression, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi.
[3] Li Q., Ni F., Gao L., et al. 2014, Evaluating the Rutting Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures using an Advanced Repeated Load Permanent Deformation Test under Field Conditions, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 61: 241–251.
[4] Mehrara A., Khodaii A. 2013, A Review of State of Art on Stripping Phenomenon in Asphalt Concrete. Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 38: 423-442.
[5] Yildirim Y. 2007, Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 21: 66-72.
[6] Jeong., Dong k., Lee S.J., Amirkhanian S.N., and Kim K.W. 2010, Interaction Effects of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Binders., Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 24: 824-31.
[7] Ameli A., Babagoli R., Asadi S., Norouzi N. 2021, Investigation of the Performance Properties of Asphalt Binders and Mixtures Modified by Crumb Rubber and Gilsonite. Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 279: 122424.
[8] Bakheit I., Xiaoming H. 2019, Modification of the Dry Method for Mixing Crumb Rubber Modifier with Aggregate and Asphalt Based on the Binder Mix Design, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 220: 278-284.
[9] Unsiwilia S., Sangpetngam B. 2018, Influence of Particle Size and Content on Deformation Resistance of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt using Dry Process Mix, Journal of Engineering, 22: 182-193.
[10] Nguyen Tai H.T., Nhan Tran T. 2018, Effects of Crumb Rubber Content and Curing Time on the Properties of Asphalt Concrete and Stone Mastic Asphalt using Dry Process, International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 11: 236-244.
[11] Hernandez-Olivares F., Witoszek-Schultz B., Fernandez-Alonso M., Moro Benito C. 2014, Rubber-modified Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement by Dry Process, International Journal of pavement Engineering, 10: 277-288.
[12] Chen S.Y., Ge D.D., Gong F.Y., You Z.P., Diab A., Ye M.X. 2020, Rheological Properties and Chemical Characterisation of Reacted and Activated Rubber Modified Asphalt Binder, Journal of Road Mater. Pavement, 21: 140-154.
[13] Moreno F., Rubio M.C., Martinez-Echevarria M.J. 2012, The Mechanical Performance of Dry Process Crumb Rubber Modified Hot Bituminous Mixes: The Influence of Digestion time and Crumb Rubber Percentage, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 26: 466-474.
[14] Presti D.L. 2013, Recycled Tire Rubber Modified Bitumen for Road Asphalt Mixture: A literature Review, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 49: 863-881.
[15] Bressi S., Fiorentini N., Huang J., Losa, M. 2019, Crumb Rubber Modifier in Road Asphalt Pavements: State of Art and Statics. Journal of Coating, 384: 1-22.
[16] Svechinsky G.I.I., Sousa J.B. 2011, Developing Warm SMA Paving Mixes using Activated Mineral Stabilizers and Bitumen Flow Modifiers, A Paper to be Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Warm Mix Asphalt St. Louis Missouri.
[17] Sampat K., Biligiri P., and Sousa J.B. 2016, Advanced Rheological Characterization of Reacted and Activated rubber (RAR) modified asphalt binders, Journal of Constr. Build. Mater, 122: 12-22.
[18] Sousa J.B., Vorobiev A., Ishai I., and Svechinsky G. 2012, Elastomeric Asphalt Extender – A New Frontier on Asphalt Rubber Mixes. Presented at the 5th International Asphalt Rubber Conference, Munich, Germany.
[19] Sousa J. B., Vorobiev A., Rowe G.M., and Ishai I. 2013, Reacted and Activated Rubber, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2371: 32-40.
[20] kavussi A., Doosti M., Azarnia M., Javadian S., Mollenhauer K. 2022, Evaluation of Hot Mix Asphalt Containing Processed and Conventional Crumb Rubber. International Conference Rubberized Asphalt, Asphalt Rubber, Spain.
[21] sahebzamani H., Fazeli R., Mahmoodinia N. 2022, Comparing the effectiveness of using SBS and Crumb Rubber as Asphalt Mixture Modifiers with Different Modification Processes, International Conference Rubberized Asphalt, Asphalt Rubber, Spain.
[22] Saha G., Kedarisetty S., Sousa J.B. 2017, Performance Characterization of Reacted and Activated Rubber (RAR) Modified Dense Graded Asphalt Mixtures, 96th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, USA, Washington D.C, 1626345: 15p.
[23] Sousa J.B., Francisco Silva M. 2016, Development of New Asphalt Mixture Thin Gap 9.5 mm with Reacted and Activated Rubber, SHRP Report.
[24] Ishai I., Svechinsky G., and Sousa J.B. 2011, Introducing an Activated Mineral as Innovative Binder-Stabilizer for SMA Paving Mixtures, Compendium, International Road Congress on Innovation in Road Infrastructures, International Road Federation – IRF, held in Moscow, Russia., November.
[25] ASTM D-1559. 2017, Test Method for Resistance of Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures using Marshall Apparatus, American Society for Testing and Materials.
[26] T. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 324. 2014, Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-track Testing of Compacted Hot mix asphalt (HMA), Author, Washington, DC.
[27] BS DD 226: 1996, Method for Determining Resistance to Permanent Deformation of Bituminous Mixtures Subjected to Unconfined Dynamic Loading, Br. Stand.