Numerical Study of Structure – soil - adjacent Structure Interaction Bed in - prone Liquefaction

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Student
2 Professor
Abstract
In urban areas, residential buildings are often located at small distances from each other. The mutual influence of these buildings, depending on the distance between them, under the effect of earthquake vibrations, is of great importance, which has been less studied and investigated. Normally, the soil-structure interaction is considered when only one structure is present on the soil, although the structure-soil-structure interaction takes place when at least two structures are placed on the soil. In case, in addition to the discussed structure and soil layer, another adjacent structure is added to the system, the response of the soil layer will be affected by the presence of both structures and the response of each of the structures will also be affected by the response of the soil layer and its adjacent structure, and therefore the soil and Each of the two adjacent structures will have a mutual effect on the response, which is known as structure-soil-structure interaction. In other words, in this interaction, the vibration energy of a structure affects its neighboring structures through the soil environment and can change its structural response. The presence of the adjacent structure can increase or decrease the dynamic response of the structure and the amount of damage depending on the dynamic characteristics of the soil and the structure and the frequency content of the incoming earthquake. When an earthquake occurs, its waves pass through the soil layers and reach the foundations of both structures. These waves cause deformations in the foundations and structural elements. Therefore, a shear force and an overturning moment are created in the foundation of the structure, which results in the deformation of the foundation and the structure. After that, the vibrations of the structure are transferred to the soil, until this part, the responses and behaviors in these systems (structure, soil and foundation) are similar to the conventional soil-structure interaction; But there is a slight difference in the transmission of these waves from the structure to the soil, which causes the structure-soil-structure interaction. In this research, the structure-soil-adjacent structure interaction has been investigated for building structures based on soil prone to liquefaction. For this purpose, similar buildings of fifteen concrete storey at different distances from each other, along with the continuous environment of the soil bed with different mechanical properties and the application of the advanced elasto-plastic constitutive model under the effect of the earthquake acceleration history applied at the bedrock level, have been analyzed. In order to validate the results, the amount of settlement of the structure under static load was investigated and using the results of two laboratory models, the structure-soil-structure interaction analysis process and the soil constitutive model were validated. Based on the obtained results, the structure-soil-structure interaction in the general state increases the lateral displacement of the structure compared to the case with a rigid bed. The interaction effects are different depending on the number and distance of the structures. Also, the results show that the effects of structure-soil-structure interaction depend on the position and thickness of the soil layer prone to liquefaction, so that with the increase in the thickness of the liquefaction layer, more exess of pore water is produced and finally, the deformations created in the soil and the structure are more intense.


Keywords

Subjects


1- Madani, B., Behnamfar, F., and Tajmir R, H., 2015, Dynamic response of structures subjected to pounding and structure–soil–structure interaction, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 78, 46-60.
2- Ghandil, M., Behnamfar, F., and Vafaeian, M., 2016, Dynamic responses of structure–soil–structure systems with an extension of the equivalent linear soil modeling, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 80, 149-162.
3- Lu, Y., Li, B., Xiong, F., Ge, Q., Zhao, P., Liu, Y., 2020, Simple discrete models for dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction analysis, Engineering Structures, Vol. 206, 110-139.
4- Vicencioa, F., Nicholas, A., 2020, Method to evaluate the dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction of 3-D buildings arrangement due to seismic excitation, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 141, 470-494.
5- Lou, M., Wang, H., Chen, X., and Zhai, Y., (2011). Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, 1724-1731.
6- Warburton, G. B. Richardson, J. D. and Webster, J. J., 1972, Harmonic Response of Masses on an Elastic Half Space. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 94, 193-200.
7- Kobori, T. Minal, R. and Kusakabe, K., 1973,Dynamical Characteristics of Soil-Structure Cross-Interaction System, I.
8- Trombetta, N. W., Mason, H. B., Hutchinson, T. C., Zupan, J. D., Bray, J. D., and Kutter, B. L. 2014, Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Centrifuge Test Observations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 140.
9- Vabbersgaard, A., 2018, Dynamic soil–structure interaction of polypod foundations, polypod foundations, Computers and Structures, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compstruc.07.007.
10- Vicencioa, F., Nicholas A., 2018, Higher mode seismic structure-soil-structure interaction between adjacent building during earthquakes, Engineering Structures, Vol. 174 , 322–337.
11- Han, B., Chen, S., Liang, J., 2020, 2D dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction: A case study of Millikan Library Building, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, Vol. 113, 346-358.
12- Cayci T, B., Akpinar, M., 2021, Seismic pounding effects on typical building structures considering soil-structure interaction, Structures, Vol. 34, 1858-1871.
13-Ecemis, N., 2021, Experimental and numerical modeling on the liquefaction potential and ground settlement of silt-interlayered stratified sands, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.144, 670-691.
14-Beaty, M.H., Byrne, P.M., 1998. An effective stress model for predicting liquefaction behavior of sand. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and solid Dynamics, ASCE Geotechnical special publication, Vol. 75, 766-777.
15-Beaty, M.H., Byrne, P.M., 2011. Ubcsand constitutive model. Itasca UDM website 904Ar. Documentation Rep., UBCSAND Constitutive Model on Itasca UDM Website.
16-Beaty, M.H., Perlea, .G., 2011. Several observation on advanced analyses with liquefiable material. Thirty first annual USSD conference on 21st century dam design-advances and adaptation, 69-97.
17-PEER ground motion database. Available: http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
18- Giridharan, S., Gowda, S., Dieter, F.E., Moormann, C., 2020, Comparison of UBCSAND and Hypoplastic soil model predictions using the Material Point Method, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 60, 989-1000.
19- Sharma, M.S., Christopher, D.P., Hoffmann, W., Moran, K., Vaziri, H., 2011, Characterization of weakly cemented sands using nonlinear failure envelopes, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 48, 146-151.
20- Sharma, M.S., Christopher, D.P., Hoffmann, W., Moran, K., Vaziri, H., 2011, Strength of Weakly Cemented Sands from Drained Multistage Triaxial Tests, JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, Vol. 137, 1202-1210.
21- Sharma, M.S., Christopher, D.P., Hoffmann, W., Moran, K., Vaziri, H., 2011, Relationship between shear wave velocity and stresses at failure for weakly cemented sands during drained triaxial compression, soils and foundation, Vol. 51, 761-771.
22-William, B., Joyner and Albert T. F., Chen, 1975, CALCULATION OF NONLINEAR GROUND RESPONSE IN EARTHQUAKES, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Vol. 65, 1315-1336.
23-Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B., 2014, Physical Modeling of Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction for Buildings on Soft Soils. International Journal of Geomechanics ,. Vol. 15(2), 128-140.
24- مقررات ملّی ساختمان ایران مبحث هفتم پی و پیسازی، سال 92، ویرایش سوم.
25- آیین نامه طراحی ساختمان‌ها در برابر زلزله استاندارد 2800 (ویرایش چهارم).
26- Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., 1969, Influence of soil conditions on ground motions during
Earthquakes. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div, Vol. 95, 99-137.