Stress Recovery and Error Estimation in Functionally Graded Problems with Isogeometrical Analysis

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student of structural engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran.
3 PhD in Structures, Shahid Montazeri Technical and Vocational College, Technical and Vocational University, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract
Today, the use of functionally graded materials is increasing. In these materials, the mechanical properties change as a continuous function throughout the problem domain. Due to these continuous changes, the problems of non-adhesion of materials, delamination and stress concentration at the joint, which can be problematic in composite structures, do not arise. Numerical methods such as the finite element method can be used to analyze functionally graded materials, but due to the limitations of this method, we will face many problems. The most important of these problems are the lack of a suitable element for the analysis of problems that can accommodate changes in the properties of materials, or the inability to accurately model the edges of shapes that have complex geometry, so in this research, the isogeometric method is used in which these weaknesses are eliminated. Also, since the error is an inseparable part of any numerical analysis and the reliability of the results has always been the main concern of the researchers, and in general, there is no exact answer to many problems, finding a solution to estimate the error in the calculations is of special importance. Therefore, in this article, for the first time, the isogeometric method has been developed in the analysis of problems with functionally graded materials with the approach of improving the stress field and estimating the error in it. This error estimator is in the category of error estimation methods based on stress recovery, and the goal is to increase the impact index of the error estimator and more adapt the error distribution method obtained from the proposed error estimator with the exact error estimator in solving problems. In this method, by using superconvergent points, where the order of convergence of the gradient of a function is one order higher than the value expected from the approximation of the shape function related to the approximate solution, a hypothetical surface is made for each stress value. To define this surface, we use the same shape functions used in the isogeometric method to approximate unknown functions. This hypothetical level is created when the coordinates x, y and z of its control points are specified. The x and y coordinates of each control point are used to model the geometric shape. The z component of the control points is calculated by minimizing the distance between this hypothetical level and the stress level obtained from isogeometric solution at the gauss-elements points of each region using the minimum square sum method. From the comparison of the exact error norm and the approximate error norm for sample problems, it can be seen that the proposed error estimation has a suitable efficiency for estimating the error in the analysis of problems with functionally graded materials by isogeometric method, and it can be used as a solution to error estimation and calculate the improved stress field level in solving functionally graded problems by isogeometric method. It is also possible to identify areas of the isogeometric solution domain that have a large error with the help of the proposed error estimator method and achieve local improvement of the network in those areas and increase the accuracy of the isogeometric solution.


Keywords

Subjects


1- Hughes, T. J., Cottrell, J. A., & Bazilevs, Y. 2005. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 194(39-41), 4135-4195.
2- Cottrell, J. A., Hughes, T. J. R., & Reali, A. 2007. Studies of refinement and continuity in isogeometric structural analysis. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 196(41-44), 4160-4183.
3-Wang, D., & Xuan, J. 2010. An improved NURBS-based isogeometric analysis with enhanced treatment of essential boundary conditions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199(37-40), 2425-2436.
4-Herrema, A. J., Wiese, N. M., Darling, C. N., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Krishnamurthy, A., & Hsu, M. C. 2017. A framework for parametric design optimization using isogeometric analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 316, 944-965.
5-Cottrell, J. A., Hughes, T. J., & Bazilevs, Y. 2009. Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. John Wiley & Sons.
6-Zienkiewicz, O. C. 2006. The background of error estimation and adaptivity in finite element computations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(4-6), 207-213.
7-Babuška, I., Strouboulis, T., Upadhyay, C. S., & Gangaraj, S. K. 1995. A model study of element residual estimators for linear elliptic problems: The quality of the estimators in the interior of meshes of triangles and quadrilaterals. Computers & structures, 57(6), 1009-1028.
8-Shigeru Saito, N. S., Nishida, K., & Kawamura, H. 1997. Preliminary characterization of interlayer for Be/Cu functionally gradient materials. Functionally Graded Materials 1996, 215.
9-Naebe, M., & Shirvanimoghaddam, K. 2016. Functionally graded materials: A review of fabrication and properties. Applied materials today, 5, 223-245.
10- Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Xia, Z., & Poh, L. H. 2018. Structural design optimization using isogeometric analysis: a comprehensive review. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 117(3), 455-507.
11-Lipton, R. 2002. Design of functionally graded composite structures in the presence of stress constraints. International journal of solids and structures, 39(9), 2575-2586.
12-Hassani, B., Moghaddam, N. Z., & Tavakkoli, S. M. 2009. Isogeometrical solution of Laplace equation.
13-Rogers, D. F. 2001. An introduction to NURBS: with historical perspective. Morgan Kaufmann.
14-Piegl, L., & Tiller, W. 1996. The NURBS book. Springer Science & Business Media.
15-Reddy, J. N. 1993. An Introduction to the Finite Element Method McGraw-Hill. Inc., New York.
16-Zienkiewicz, O. C., Taylor, R. L., & Zhu, J. Z. 2005. The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Elsevier.
17-Zienkiewicz, O. C., & Zhu, J. Z. 1992. The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 33(7), 1331-1364.
18- Hassani, B., Ganjali, A., & Tavakkoli, M. 2012. An isogeometrical approach to error estimation and stress recovery. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 31(1), 101-109.
19-Zienkiewicz, O. C., & Taylor, R. L. 2005. The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. Elsevier.
20-Kim, J. H., & Paulino, G. H. 2002. Isoparametric graded finite elements for nonhomogeneous isotropic and orthotropic materials. J. Appl. Mech., 69(4), 502-514.
21-Burlayenko, V. N., Altenbach, H., Sadowski, T., Dimitrova, S. D., & Bhaskar, A. 2017. Modelling functionally graded materials in heat transfer and thermal stress analysis by means of graded finite elements. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 45, 422-438.
22-Dörfel, M. R., Jüttler, B., & Simeon, B. 2010. Adaptive isogeometric analysis by local h-refinement with T-splines. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 199(5-8), 264-275.