Design of Lead-rubber Isolators with Energy Method and Evaluating its Accuracy for Very Important Steel Structures

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
S. Ebrahimi
S. Zahrai
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Tehran University
10.22034/23.1.15
Abstract
Base isolation is an effective technology for reducing seismic damage to structural and non-structural components as well as building contents, allowing buildings to maintain their function during and after a rare, high-intensity earthquake. This makes it an ideal seismic response correction system for importance buildings. The main advantage of isolated structures is that seismic responses can be easily and effectively reduced by prolonging the period and increasing damping. Therefore, the natural period of the structure isolated from the base is longer. In this paper, a new energy balance method is used to design a lead rubber bearing (LRB) isolator. Energy balance method is an analysis method to evaluate seismic resistance based on the balance of seismic energy input to buildings due to ground motion and energy absorbed by the building. In other words, the energy balance method is a response prediction method to approximate the seismic response of buildings isolated from the foundation. This method is effective for determining the relationship between ground motion, seismic isolation period and the effect of reducing the reaction of dampers. In this method, the specifications of the isolation system, including stiffness, yield shear force and viscous damping ratio, are adjusted in such a way that the maximum shear and maximum displacement in the isolation system do not exceed a certain value determined by the designer. This allows the designer to limit the maximum displacement at the isolation level to a certain amount when there is a constraint on the supply of separation distance around the building and the isolated level. Also, by limiting the maximum shear of the isolators, it is possible to use the base isolation system for retrofitting the existing structures that have a certain lateral capacity.

This design method was first proposed and used in Japan. This method has been recently proposed in the Iranian regulations (which is being drafted) and has not been used much in this country so far. Its advantages include no need for trial and error in the design process, the possibility of designing a rubber and frictional type of seismic isolator, the possibility of using a viscous or hysteretic damper, or a combination of both at the isolator installation site. To evaluate the accuracy of this method, three 5, 10 and 15-story steel structures with an ordinary concentric braced frames in both directions for clinic usage have been modeled and under eight near and far-field earthquakes in the by the nonlinear time-history analysis method have been analyzed. The results obtained from the time-history analysis are in good agreement with the estimated results of the energy balance method. The error percentage related to the displacement of isolator compared to the value assumed at the beginning of the design for 5, 10 and 15-story structures is 3.4%, 2.57% and 2.12%, respectively. Also, the percentages of error related to the maximum shear of isolator compared to the value obtained from the performance curve for 5, 10 and 15-story structures are 11.08%, 12.61% and 13.98%, respectively.

Keywords

Subjects

1. AIJ. Design Recommendations for Seismically Isolated Buildings. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). 2016.
2. HIGASHINO S, KITAMURA H. Energy-Balance Based Seismic Response Prediction Methods for Seismic Isolated Buildings With Rubber Bearings and Viscous Dampers. J Struct Constr Eng (Transactions AIJ). 2005;70(588):79–86.
3. Baratta A, Corbi I. Optimal design of base-isolators in multi-storey buildings. Comput Struct. 2004;82(23–26):2199–209.
4. CHIBA Y, SATSUKAWA K, KITAMURA H, KOYAMA Y. Energy Balance-Based Seismic Response Prediction Methods for Seismic Isolated Buildings With Rubber Bearings, Dampers and Low Friction Elastic Sliding Bearings. J Struct Constr Eng (Transactions AIJ). 2004;69(575):65–72.
5. Hu JW. Response of seismically isolated steel frame buildings with sustainable lead-rubber bearing (LRB) isolator devices subjected to near-fault (NF) ground motions. Sustain. 2015;7(1):111–37.
6. Matsagar VA, Jangid RS. Base Isolation for Seismic Retrofitting of Structures. Pract Period Struct Des Constr. 2008;13(4):175–85.
7. Architectural Institute of Japan. Structural Design. In: Design Recommendations for Seismically Isolated Buildings. 2016. p. 149–154.
8. Austin MA, Lin W-J. Energy Balance Assessment of Base-Isolated Structures. J Eng Mech. 2004;130(3):347–58.
9. Office of National Regulation and Building Control, Deputy Minister of Housing, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. Seismic design guide for buildings equipped with dampers and seismic isolators (in press),(in persian). 2021.
10. Bazrafshan A, Khaji N. Seismic response of base-isolated high-rise buildings under long period ground motions (in persian). Modares Civ Eng J. 2016;16(2):41–52.
11. Permanent Committee for Revising the Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings: Standard No.2800 (in persian). 4th ed. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center; 2014.
12. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. 2017. 1–889 p.
13. PEER Ground Motion Database - PEER Center [Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 30]. Available from: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
14. Supervision Office of Deputy for Strategic Department of Technical Affairs. Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (in persian). 2013.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 23, Issue 1
March and April 2023
Pages 221-234