Investigation and Comparison of the Effect of Melting and Freezing Cycles on the Strength and Durability of Recycled and Conventional Concrete with Different Ratios of Water to Cement

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Graduate of Noshirvani University of Babylon
2 Assistant Professor of Noshirvani University of Babol
3 Faculty member of Noshirvani University of BabolProfessor of Noshirvani University of Babol
Abstract
Recycling of concrete has been the focus of researchers owing to the large volume of concrete waste and the limited resources of valuable materials. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) contains aggregates of various types of concrete and building materials that have been destroyed due to their shelf life or as a result of war and natural disasters. In order to use different types of recycled aggregates (RA), it is necessary to conduct more detailed and sensitive research on the behavior of RAC in order to reach the highest possible level of quality and cost in the construction process. On the other hand, RA are made of concrete with different properties and its aggregates have been subjected to different form of loading, hence it is important to carefully examine their behavior and properties. Therefore, in this study, the strength and the durability of RAC after freeze and thaw cycles were compared with natural concrete while different water/cement ratios are used.

In this study, RA were extracted from demolished waste concrete specimens and used to produce three mixtures named RC, RN and NC while 100, 50 and 0 percent of RA were replaced respectively. Water to cement ratio were kept as 45 and 55 percent of cement. A total number of 57 samples for flexural, compressive, tensile strength and ultrasonic tests were made. 24 samples were placed in the refrigerator and freeze and thaw cycles were applied on. 18 and 15 specimens were prepared for testing at 28 and 120 days of age, respectively. According to ASTM C666, the relative dynamic modulus of the specimens was tested using ultrasonic test after each 40 cycle’s period. After the test was finished, compressive strength, single point bending, indirect tensile tests and elastic modulus were determined for each specimens. Finally, the behavior of recycled and natural concrete was compared.

The results showed that the freeze and thaw cycles reduced the resistance of both RAC and NAC. Recycled aggregates have 2.5 times more water absorption than Natural aggregates. RAC has lost 41%, 18%, 10% and 28% of its compressive, flexural, tensile strength and modulus of elasticity, after the freeze and thaw cycle, respectively. The 100% replacement of RA reduced even more the mechanical behavior of samples. The relative dynamic modulus at the end of the cycles for RAC was 2% higher than that of NAC, indicating its better durability properties against freeze and thaw cycles. Concrete with 50% replacement of recycled aggregate has almost the same durability and strength as NAC, hence is recommended to be use in similar condition

Keywords

Subjects


1- Freedonia (2012) World Construction Aggregates. Industry Study No. 2838. The Freedonia Group, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
2- ‘EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Advanced sustainable materials management: 2014 tables and figures’ (2016).
3- Eurostat, Waste statistics: Statistics explained. Available from: , http://ec:europa.eu/ eurostat/statistics explained . (accessed 21.09.17.). (2017).
4- Limbachiya, M. C., Leelawat, T. and R. K. Dhir (2000) ‘Use of recycled concrete aggregate in high-strength concrete’, 33(November), pp. 574–580.
5- Zaharieva, R. (2004) ‘Frost resistance of recycled aggregate concrete’, 34, pp. 1927–1932. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.025.
6- Gokce, A. et al. (2004) ‘Freezing and thawing resistance of air-entrained concrete incorporating recycled coarse aggregate : The role of air content in demolished concrete’, 34, pp. 799–806. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.014.
7- Salem, R. M. and Burdette, E. G. (1998) ‘Role of chemical and mineral admixtures on physical properties and frost-resistance of recycled aggregate concrete.’, ACI Mater. J. 95 (5), 8_63.
8- Huda, S. B. and Alam, M. S. (2015) ‘Mechanical and Freeze-Thaw Durability Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Made with Recycled Coarse Aggregate’, Materials in Civil Engineering.
9- Shi, C. et al. (2015) ‘Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate - A review’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.057.
10- Topc, B. and Selim sengel (2004) ‘Properties of concretes produced with waste concrete aggregate ˙’, 34, pp. 1307–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.019.
11- Hansen, T. C. (1985) ‘Recycled aggregates and recycled aggregate concrete second state-of-the-art report developments’, pp. 201–246.
12- Pedro, D., Brito, J. De and Evangelista, L. (2017) ‘Structural concrete with simultaneous incorporation of fine and coarse recycled concrete aggregates : Mechanical , durability and long-term properties’, Construction and Building Materials, 154, pp. 294–309. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.215.
13- Šeps, K., Fládr, J. and Broukalová, I. (2016) ‘Resistance of recycled aggregate concrete to freeze-thaw and deicing salts’, Procedia Engineering. Elsevier B.V., 151, pp. 329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.367.
14- Tabsh, S. W. and Abdelfatah, A. S. (2009) ‘Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete’, Construction and Building Materials. Elsevier Ltd, 23(2), pp. 1163–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.007.
15- Xiao, J.-Z. and Lan, Y. (2006) ‘Investigation on the tensile behavior of recycled aggregate concrete’, Jianzhu Cailiao Xuebao(Journal of Building Materials), 154–158.
16- Abid, S. R. et al. (2018) ‘Case Studies in Construction Materials Expansion and strength properties of concrete containing contaminated recycled concrete aggregate’, Case Studies in Construction Materials. Elsevier Ltd., p. e00201. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00201.
17- ASTMC666 (2015) ‘Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing’. doi: 10.1520/C0666.