Compressive performance of steel fiber-reinforced concrete-encased steel composite stub columns

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
A. Memarzadeh 1
M. Nematzadeh
M. Ahmadi 2
1 University of Mazandaran
2 Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran
Abstract
Concrete and steel are materials with extensive use in human construction activities. Concrete is a material with high stiffness which is less expensive than other available construction materials, and steel is a material with high strength and ductility. Steel-concrete composite structural systems have been utilized in the construction of high-rise buildings due to their superior structural behavior. Fibrous concrete-encased steel columns are one of the most important composite structural members in which the axial load is carried by the steel and concrete at the same time. These columns are attracting the interest of many researchers due to their excellent structural performance under both static and seismic loading conditions. The steel-concrete interaction enhances the performance when carrying monotonous and earthquake loading. Reinforcing steel fibers help control crack propagation and prevent brittle failure in concrete through improving aggregate interlocking and thus enhance the properties of concrete including the tensile strength and ductility. This paper aims to investigate the axial capacity of fibrous concrete-encased steel composite stub columns. A total of 36 specimens with different cross-sectional shapes of steel profiles, including H-shaped and C-shaped, were tested, and axial parameters and compressive behavior were investigated. The variables of the research included the shape of the steel profile (H-shaped and C-shaped), steel fiber volume ratio (0%, 0.75%, and 1.25%), and the stirrup spacing (40, 65, and 130 mm). The results showed that the loading capacity of fibrous concrete-encased steel columns was affected by the shape of the steel profile inside. In this regard, the use of the H-shaped steel profile in the columns led to a higher axial loading capacity than the use of the C-shaped steel profile, due to greater confinement provided by concrete in columns with this section type (H-shape). Moreover, the addition of fibers significantly increased the ductility of these columns in comparison with those without fibers, and also, the addition of fibers increased the axial capacity of the steel-concrete composite columns by 6%. On the other hand, given the results, it is found that the stirrup spacing had a considerable effect on the load-carrying capacity of these columns, in that by increasing the stirrup spacing, due to the lower confinement of the column, the axial load-carrying capacity declined. In this regard, as the stirrup spacing increased, the decline in this parameter reached up to 11% for the columns with the H-shaped profile and 9% for the columns with the C-shaped profiles. Furthermore, the results of this study showed that the specimen with the H-shaped steel sections, 1.25% fibers, and the stirrup spacing of 40 mm generally were the optimal specimens in terms of the axial load-carrying capacity and ductility in comparison with the other specimens under study. All the specimens had almost similar damage patterns up to their failure. The difference was that the specimens containing fibers experienced failure mainly in the form of the crushing of concrete cover and its breakage from the middle of the column height, due to greater integrity of the concrete structure in these specimens. However, in the specimens without fibers, a considerable portion of the concrete cover was completely detached from the column.

Keywords

Subjects

[1] Matsui, C., 1979. Study on elasto-plastic behaviour of concrete-encased columns subjected to eccentric axial thrust. Annual Assembly of Architectural Institute of Japan, pp.1627-8.
[2] Nematzadeh, M. and Fazli, S., 2020. Effect of axial loading conditions and confinement type on concrete-steel composite behavior. Computers and Concrete, 25(2), pp.95-109.
[3] Park, S., 1994. EN 1994-Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures.
[4] Nematzadeh, M., Memarzadeh, A. and Karimi, A., 2020. Post-fire elastic modulus of rubberized fiber-reinforced concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns: Experimental and theoretical study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 175, p.106310.
[5] ANSI, A., 2005. AISC 341-05 ‘‘Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.’’. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
[6] Sheikh, S.A. and Uzumeri, S.M., 1982. Analytical model for concrete confinement in tied columns. Journal of the Structural Division, 108(12), pp.2703-2722.
[7] Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J. and Park, R., 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of structural engineering, 114(8), pp.1804-1826.
[8] Griffis, L.G., 1992. Load and resistance factor design of W-shapes encased in concrete (Vol. 6). American Institute of Steel Construction.
[9] Huang, Z., Huang, X., Li, W., Zhou, Y., Sui, L. and Liew, J.Y., 2018, June. Experimental behaviour of very high-strength concrete-encased steel composite column subjected to axial compression and end moment. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures. ASCCS 2018 (pp. 323-329). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
[10] Li, K.W., Li, Z.Y., Wan, X. and Liu, F., 2015. Non-Linear Numerical Simulation on Hysteretic Behavior of SRC Columns. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 723, pp. 382-386). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
[11] Zhou, X. and Liu, J., 2010. Seismic behavior and strength of tubed steel reinforced concrete (SRC) short columns. Journal of constructional steel research, 66(7), pp.885-896
[12] Chen, C.C. and Lin, N.J., 2006. Analytical model for predicting axial capacity and behavior of concrete encased steel composite stub columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(5), pp.424-433.
[13] Mirza, S.A. and Skrabek, B.W., 1992. Statistical analysis of slender composite beam-column strength. Journal of Structural Engineering, 118(5), pp.1312-1332.
[14] Wang, H.T. and Wang, L.C., 2013. Experimental study on static and dynamic mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 38, pp.1146-1151.
[15] Lau, A. and Anson, M., 2006. Effect of high temperatures on high performance steel fibre reinforced concrete. Cement and concrete research, 36(9), pp.1698-1707.
[16] ASTM, C., 2003. 143: Standard test method for slump of hydraulic cement concrete. ASTM International.
[17] Xiao, J., Huang, Y., Yang, J. and Zhang, C., 2012. Mechanical properties of confined recycled aggregate concrete under axial compression. Construction and Building Materials, 26(1), pp.591-603.
[18] Yu, Q., Tao, Z. and Wu, Y.X., 2008. Experimental behaviour of high performance concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 46(4), pp.362-370.
[19] Lai, B., Liew, J.R., Venkateshwaran, A., Li, S. and Xiong, M., 2020. Assessment of high-strength concrete encased steel composite columns subject to axial compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 164, p.105765.
[20] Tao, Z., Han, L.H. and Wang, D.Y., 2007. Experimental behaviour of concrete-filled stiffened thin-walled steel tubular columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 45(5), pp.517-527.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 21, Issue 3
May and June 2021
Pages 189-203