Effects of High Occupancy Toll Lane implementation Policy on The Modeling of Mode Choice (Case Study: Chamran Highway)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Imam Khomeini International University
2 Imam Khomeini International Unversity
Abstract
The high-occupancy lanes are one of the urban traffic management strategies which attract many developing countries in recent years. High-occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes have been implemented in the United States and Europe, but never in developing countries. Thus, such a study is necessary in Iran. In general, the most trips are single-occupancy vehicle (SOV), which increases the number of vehicles in the streets. In this regard, for reducing SOV, especially in high-occupancy lanes, and increasing the capacity, HOT was used in developing countries. The main purpose of the present study was modeling and evaluating the factors influencing the mode choice in the presence of HOT lanes. Many studies evaluated the use of high-occupancy lanes, while in the present study the factor of entrance and departure to / from the field of study and calculating the saved time in different routes and converting it to monetary value to pay tolls were used for the first time. Due to the lack of these facilities in Iran, the data were collected using the stated preference method. Therefore, 1000 observations were investigated and a binary logit model was used to analyze the data. The results indicate that by increasing price (due to increasing saved time), individual willingness decreased for using high occupancy lanes. In addition, nearly 26% of drivers were willing to use HOT lanes when was free of charge, while the percentage of selecting HOT is almost zero when the price is high. Furthermore, in 180000 Rials, the selection percentage reached below 5%. Additionally, the results of the model showed that based on the entrance and departure to / from Chamran Highway, individuals desire to use HOT lanes. In addition, when individuals live in the shortest distance from the field of study, there is a 31% desire to use HOT lanes, while increasing to 25 km, tendency reaches almost zero percent. It is also worth noting that women were more inclined to use HOT lanes.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of environmental psychology, 26(1), 15-26.
[2] Correia, G., & Viegas, J. M. (2011). Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(2), 81-90.‏
[3] Shaheen, S., Sperling, D., & Wagner, C. (1999). Carsharing and partnership management: an international perspective. Transportation Research Record, 1666(1), 118-124.
[4] International Energy Agency. (1997). Indicators of energy use and efficiency: understanding the link between energy and human activity. OECD.‏
[5] Perez, B. G., Sciara, G. C., & Parsons, B. (2002). A guide for HOT lane development (No. FHWA-OP-03-009). United States. Federal Highway Administration.‏
[6] Li, J. (2001). Explaining high-occupancy-toll lane use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 6(1), 61-74.‏
[7] Morichi, S. (2005). Long-term strategy for transport system in Asian megacities. Journal of the Eastern Asia society for transportation studies, 6, 1-22.‏
[8] Van, H. T., Choocharukul, K., & Fujii, S. (2014). The effect of attitudes toward cars and public transportation on behavioral intention in commuting mode choice—A comparison across six Asian countries. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 69, 36-44.‏
[9] Liu, X., Yan, X., Liu, F., Wang, R., & Leng, Y. (2019). A trip-specific model for fuel saving estimation and subsidy policy making of carpooling based on empirical data. Applied Energy, 240, 295-311.
[10] Delhomme, P., & Gheorghiu, A. (2016). Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 42, 1-15.‏
[11] van der Waerden, P., Lem, A., & Schaefer, W. (2015). Investigation of factors that stimulate car drivers to change from car to carpooling in city center oriented work trips. Transportation research procedia, 10, 335-344.‏
[12] Shaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D., & Gaynor, T. (2016). Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transport Policy, 51, 165-173.‏
[13] Gheorghiu, A., & Delhomme, P. (2018). For which types of trips do French drivers carpool? Motivations underlying carpooling for different types of trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 460-475.
[14] Monchambert, G. (2020). Why do (or don’t) people carpool for long distance trips? A discrete choice experiment in France. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 911-931.‏
[15] De Luca, S., & Di Pace, R. (2015). Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 71, 59-76.‏
[16] Chum, G. L., & Burris, M. W. (2008). Potential mode shift from transit to single-occupancy vehicles on a high-occupancy toll lane. Transportation Research Record, 2072(1), 10-19.‏
[17] Abulibdeh, A., & Zaidan, E. (2018). Analysis of factors affecting willingness to pay for high-occupancy-toll lanes: Results from stated-preference survey of travelers. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 91-105.
[18] Mirbaha, B., Saffarzadeh, M., Seyedabrishami, E., Sherafatipour, S. (2013). Users' Value of Time Estimation in Congestion Priced Urban Areas. Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, 4(3), 275-292.
[19] Statistical Centre of Iran، https://www.amar.org.ir/، 2017
[20] Ben-Akiva, M. E., Lerman, S. R., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (Vol. 9). MIT press.