Effect of Microsilica and CFRP Fibers on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag–Based Geopolymer Concrete

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
S. Najmi 1
A. Rahbari 1
E. Darvishan 1
M. Adabi 2
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
2 Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
Abstract
Concrete is the most widely used building material in construction industry worldwide and its constituents are easily accessible everywhere. However, cement industry, as the producer of the primary binder of concrete, is one of the effective sources of environment degradation. Cement production needs extraction of mineral resources and burning fuel and causes extensive greenhouse emission due to disintegration of raw materials. Cement production alone is responsible for 7% of global CO2 emission with estimated annual growth of 4%. Toward environmental sustainability, one way is partially or totally replacing cement by waste or byproducts of other industries such as fly ash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), waste water, metakaolin, and silica fume. Geopolymer is a cementitious material with comparable characteristics to those of ordinary cement produced by alumina- and silica-rich waste materials. Therefore, it does not require energy-intensive and pollutive calcination process. Geopolymerization is formed by reaction of silica-alumina under an alkaline solution which creates three dimensional Si-O-Al-O polymeric chains to attain compressive strength, compared to the ordinary cement which develops calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H) as the main adhesive. Extensive research has conducted on geopolymer concrete. However, more investigations are needed to better understand characteristics of geopolymer concrete containing additives. Fibers are proved to have a positive effect on mechanical strength of concrete. As well, fillers such as microsilica can improve mechanical and durability of concrete. Moreover, most studies in this area are focused on fly ash-based geopolymers and the investigations on GGBS-based geopolymer are rare in the literature. In this study, mechanical and durability of GGBS-based geopolymer concrete containing CFRP fibers and microsilica is investigated. Different concrete samples with 0-3% CFRP fibers and 0-10% microsilica are prepared and experimentally tested. Sodium Hydroxide (NH) and Sodium Silicate (NS) solutions are used as alkali activators. 8 M NH as well as NS with 14.7 Na2O and 29.4 SiO2are used with the NS/NH ratio of 2.5. Since no standard exists for mix design of geopolymer concrete, proposed mix design by Venkatesan and Pazhani (2015) is used. Alkaline to binder ratio of 0.4 is selected with 430 kg/m3binder.The specimens were tested after 28 days of curing. Next, mechanical and durability tests including compressive strength, tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, water absorption, RCPT, and acid resistance are conducted on the samples. Also, microstructure of the geopolymer concrete is investigated. Results of experimental tests show that, compressive and tensile strength of geopolymer samples decrease by adding microsilica. However, 5% microsilica is the best value to enhance mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. On the other hand, microsilica can enhance durability properties of geopolymer concrete so that adding 5% microsilica causes moderate improvement of water absorption and chloride penetration. The greatest impact of microsilica is on acid resistance by which adding 5% microsilica resulted in 67% improvement of compressive strength loss. However, unlike the microsilica, CFRP fibers have detrimental effect on mechanical properties and durability of the geopolymer concrete since adding fibers can yield disruption of concrete integrity .On the other point of view, microstructure study shows that all the specimens exhibit micro cracks that can inversely affect the performance of concrete. Also, SEM images show that there is not a strong bond between CFRP fibers and binder paste which yields lower performance of concrete specimens containing fiber.


Keywords

Subjects

[1] Saha, S. and Rajasekaran, C., 2017. Enhancement of the properties of fly ash based geopolymer paste by incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag. Construction and Building Materials, 146, pp.615-620.
[2]Mehta, K.P., 2001. Reducing the environmental impact of concrete.Concrete international, 23(10), pp.61-66.
[3]Phoo-ngernkham, T., Chindaprasirt, P., Sata, V., Hanjitsuwan, S. and Hatanaka, S., 2014. The effect of adding nano-SiO2 and nano-Al2O3 on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Materials & Design, 55, pp.58-65.
[4]Khale, D. and Chaudhary, R., 2007. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. Journal of materials science, 42(3), pp.729-746.
[5]Ma, C.K., Awang, A.Z. and Omar, W., 2018. Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 186, pp.90-102.
[6]Elchalakani, M., Dong, M., Karrech, A., Li, G., Mohamed Ali, M.S., Xie, T. and Yang, B., 2018.Development of Fly Ash-and Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete with Calcium Carbonate or Microsilica.Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(12), p.04018325.
[7]Lee, N.K., An, G.H., Koh, K.T. and Ryu, G.S., 2016. Improved reactivity of fly ash-slag geopolymer by the addition of silica fume.Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016.
[8]Okoye, F., Durgaprasad, J., Singh, N. 2016. Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete, Ceramics International 42(2),pp. 3000-3006.
[9]Sivasakthi, M., Jeyalakshmi, R., Rajamane, N., Jose, R. 2018 Thermal and structural micro analysis of micro silica blended fly ash based geopolymer composites, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 499, pp.117-130.
[10]Pan, Z., Sanjayan, J. G., Rangan, B. V. 2011 Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete, Magazine of concrete research, 63(10), pp.763-771.
[11]Neville A.M., Brooks J.J., Concrete technology, Longman Scientific & Technical England, 1987.
[12]Payakaniti, P., Pinitsoonthorn, S., Thongbai, P., Amornkitbamrung, V. and Chindaprasirt, P., 2018. Effects of carbon fiber on mechanical and electrical properties of fly ash geopolymer composite.Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(6), pp.14017-14025.
[13]Liu, L.P., Zhu, H., He, Y. and Cui, X.M., 2015. Preparation of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Composites. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 1081, pp. 275-278).Trans Tech Publications.
[14]ASTM C33, A. 2004. Standard specification for concrete aggregates.American Society for Testing and Material, West Conshohocken, PA.
[15] ASTM, C 136. (2006). Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates.American Society for Testing and Material.West Conshohocken, PA.
[16]Virgalitte, S.J., Luther, M.D., Rose, J.H., Mather, B., Bell, L.W., Ehmke, B.A., Klieger, P., Roy, D.M., Call, B.M., Hooton, R.D. and Lewis, D.W., 1995. Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag as a Cementitious Constituent in Concrete.American Concrete Institute ACI Report 233R-95.
[17]Aldred, J.M., Holland, T.C., Morgan, D.R., Roy, D.M., Bury, M.A., Hooton, R.D., Olek, J., Scali, M.J., Detwiler, R.J., Jaber, T.M. and Ozyildirim, H.C., 2006. Guide for the use of silica fume in concrete. ACI–American Concrete Institute–Committee: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 234.
[18]Dadsetan, S., Siad, H., Lachemi, M. and Sahmaran, M., 2019. Construction and demolition waste in geopolymer concrete technology: a review. Magazine of Concrete Research, pp.1-21.
[19]Nazari, A., Bagheri, A. and Riahi, S., 2011. Properties of geopolymer with seeded fly ash and rice husk bark ash. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 528(24), pp.7395-7401.
[20]Venkatesan, R.P. and Pazhani, K.C., 2016. Strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete made with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(6), pp.2384-2391.
[21] BS part 116, 1983, Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes, British Standards Institution, London
[22]ASTM, C496/C496M-11, 2011, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[23]ASTM C597-02, 2002. Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete.Annual Book of American Society of Testing and Materials, pp.04-02.
[24] BS 1881-122, 1983, Testing concrete. Method for determination of water absorption.”British Standards Institution, London.
[25]ASTM, C 2012. 2012, Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration.Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4, p.7.
[26]Payakaniti, P., Pinitsoonthorn, S., Thongbai, P., Amornkitbamrung, V. and Chindaprasirt, P., 2018. Effects of carbon fiber on mechanical and electrical properties of fly ash geopolymer composite.Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(6), pp.14017-14025.
[27]Zaetang, Y., Wongsa, A., Sata, V. and Chindaprasirt, P., 2015. Use of coal ash as geopolymer binder and coarse aggregate in pervious concrete.Construction and Building Materials, 96, pp.289-295.
[28] Khater, H. M. 2013. Effect of silica fume on the characterization of the geopolymer materials.International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 5(1), p. 12.
[29] Moon, J., Bae, S., Celik, K., Yoon, S., Kim, K. H., Kim, K. S., & Monteiro, P. J., 2014. Characterization of natural pozzolan-based geopolymeric binders. Cement and Concrete Composites,53, pp. 97–104.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 20, Issue 5
November and December 2020
Pages 207-218