Determination of Compressive and Flexural Strengths of In-situ Pozzolanic Concrete Containing Polypropylene and Glass Fibers Using "Twist-off" Method

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Faculty member
2 PhD Student
Abstract
Determination of Compressive and Flexural Strengths of In-situ Pozzolanic Concrete Containing Polypropylene and Glass Fibers Using "Twist-off" Method



Abstract

Fibers incorporated in concrete, have different shapes and sizes. The main reasons for incorporating fibers in concrete, are to prevent cracking, disintegration of concrete and to increase its resistance to dynamic loading and explosion. As for ordinary concrete, pozzolanic materials can be used along with the fibers. In this paper, the effect of the incorporation of polypropylene and glass fibers in concrete is investigated using the newly developed “Twist-off” method. The “Twist-off” method developed by Naderi is a partially destructive method with high accuracy and very low cost and negligible surface damage. In this method, a metallic disc with 25mm height and 40mm diameter is attached to the surface of concrete under test, using epoxy adhesive. After the setting and hardening of the glue, an ordinary torque-meter is used to apply a torque until the metallic disc is separated from the surface of the concrete. Since the adhesional strength of the epoxy resin to concrete surface is much higher than the strength of the concrete, the failure is bound to happen at the concrete surface. Therefore, the failure measured torque is used to estimate the concrete strength. In order to estimate the compressive strength of the concrete by the method of “Twist-off”, a calibration graph is prepared by employing concrete cubes with different strength. The “Twist-off” strength of these cubes were measured and they are related to their compressive strengths, using ordinary compressive testing machine. Therefore, compressive strength of pozzolanic concrete containing glass and polypropylene fibers were also measured, using 150 mm concrete cubes. The surface strength of the fiber concrete cubes was measured using the “Twist-off” method. The results obtained in this research, show that, addition of glass and polypropylene fibers to pozzolanic concrete increases the surface strength, compressive strength, modulus of rapture of concrete and the load bearing capacity of concrete beams. The random distribution of fibers in concrete beams, increases its ductility and at the failure load, pull out of the fibers are predominant compared to their breakage. The results tend to show that the addition of two percent fibers tend to increase the strength, ductility and the modulus of the elasticity of the pozzolanic concrete. It was also observed that while the addition of glass fibers increases the surface strength of the low strength concrete (40 MPa or less), its addition to the concrete reduces its strength. Compared with the effect of the polypropylene fibers, it was seen that, the increase in the surface strength of concrete with glass fibers is more pronounced. Examination of the results presented in this paper tend to indicate that the “Twist-off “ method can be used for the determination of the surface strength of concrete as well as its compressive strength, with acceptable accuracy and very little surface damage to tested area. Compared with other in-situe methods for concrete strength assessment, the ”Twist-off” method is much cheaper and needs no expert operators. Statistical analysis of the comparative results of the “Twist-off” and the ordinary compressive testing method indicates that the torque obtained in the “Twist-off” method, can be directly related to the compressive strength of the concrete without the need to calculate stress intensities. The relation between the “Twist-off” and compressive strength tests is seen to be linear.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] ACI Committee 214, Report 214.4R-03. 2003 Guide for Obtaining Cores and Interpreting Compressive Strength Results, American Concrete Institute.
[2] Masi. A., Digrisolo. A., Santarsieo. G. 2013. arsiero, “Experimental evaluation of drilling damage on the strength of cores extracted from RC buildings. in Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(7). p. 749.
[3] ASTM C900-15. 2015 Standard Test Method for Pullout Strength of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[4] ASTM C597-16. 2016 Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[5] ASTM C808/C805M-18. 2018 Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[6] ASTM C1583/C1583M-13. 2013 Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength of Concrete Surfaces and the Bond Strength or Tensile Strength of Concrete Repair and Overlay Materials by Direct Tension (Pull-off Method), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
[7] Kakooei S., Mdakil H., Jamshidi M., & Rouhi J. 2012 The Effects of Polypropylene Fibers on The Properties of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Construction and Building Materials Journal, Vol 27, 73-7. Pereira. E., Medeiros. M.H.F. 2012 Pull off Test to Evaluate the Compressive Strength of Concrete: an Alternative to Brazilian Standard Techniques. Ibracon Structures and Materials Journal. 5(6). p. 757-780.
[8] Naderi M. 2007 New Twist-Off Method for the Evaluation of In-Situ Strength of Concrete, Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 35(6). ISSN: 0090-3973.
[9] Naderi. M., Shibani. R. 2013 New Method for Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Strength. Australian Journal of Basic Applied Sciences. 7(2). p. 438-447.
[10] Naderi. M., Musavi. M. 2013 Comparison of In situ Concrete Strength of Structural Elements with Strength ofTtheir Cubic Laboratory Samples Using “Twist-off” Method. International Conference on Civil Engineering Architecture & Urban Sustainable Development. (in Persian).
[11] Naderi. M., SheikhAleslami. A., Mohsenzadeh. R. 1391 Case studies to determine the concrete strength of damaged structures using in situ methods. National Conference on Transport Infrastructure. (in Persian).
[12] Alsadey. S., Salem. M. 2016 Influence of Polypropylene Fiber on Strength of Concrete. American Journal of Engineering Research. 5(7). p. 223-226.
[13] Alam. M., Ahmad. I., Rehman. F. 2015 Experimental Study on Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Conrete. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology. 24(6). p. 297-301.
[14] ACI Committee 544, Report 544.1R-96. 2009 State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Concr. Int., ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 5.
[15] Iranian National Standardization Organization (INSO). Number 4977. 2015. Aggregates-Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates- Test Method. (in Persian).
[16] Iranian National Standardization Organization (INSO). Number 4982. 2017. Aggregate-Determination of Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Water Absorption of Coarse Aggregate- Test Method. (in Persian).
[17] Iranian National Standardization Organization (INSO). Number 4982. 2017. Aggregate-Determination of Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Water Absorption of Coarse Aggregate- Test Method. (in Persian).
[18] Building and Housing Research Center (BHRC). 2008 The National Method for Concrete Mix Design. (in Persian).
[19] Iranian National Standardization Organization (INSO). Number 17731. 2014. Flexural Strength of Concrete Using Simple Beam With Center-Point Loading- Test Method. (in Persian).
[20] British Standard 1881-118. 1983 Methods of Testing concrete, Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes, British Standards Institution, Londen.
[21] ACI Committee 318, Report 318R-14. 2014 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute. (Part 19.2.3)