1. Council, A.T., Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report No. SSC 96-01: ATC-40, 1996. 1.
2. Agency, F.E.M., NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. 2003: Fema.
3. FEMA, A., 440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA-440, Redwood City, 2005.
4. Engineers, A.S.o.C., Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06).: Rehabilitation Requirements; . 2007: American Society of Civil Engineers.
5. Paret, T.F., et al. Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects. in Proceedings of the eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering. 1996.
6. Chopra, A.K. and R.K. Goel, A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2002. 31(3): p. 561-582.
7. Poursha, M., F. Khoshnoudian, and A. Moghadam, A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings. Engineering Structures, 2009. 31(2): p. 591-599.
8. Poursha, M., F. Khoshnoudian, and A. Moghadam, The extended consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of two-way unsymmetric-plan tall buildings under influence of two horizontal components of ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014. 63: p. 162-173.
9. Kreslin, M. and P. Fajfar, The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2011. 40(14): p. 1571-1589.
10. Poursha, M. and M.A. Amini, A single-run multi-mode pushover analysis to account for the effect of higher modes in estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015. 13(8): p. 2347-2365.
11. Amini, M.A. and M. Poursha, A non-adaptive displacement-based pushover procedure for the nonlinear static analysis of tall building frames. Engineering Structures, 2016. 126: p. 586-597.
12. Shayanfar, M.A., et al., Optimization of modal load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures. Struct. Eng. Mech, 2013. 47(1): p. 119-129.
13. Nakazawa, S., et al. Study on Seismic Response Estimation Based on Pushover Analysis for Membrane Structures Supported by Substructure. in Proceedings of the. 2005.
14. Kato, S., S. Nakazawa, and K. Saito. Two-modes pushover analysis for reticular domes for use of performance based design for estimating responses to severe earthquakes. in Proc. IASS Symposium. 2005.
15. Ohsaki, M. and J. Zhang, Prediction of inelastic seismic responses of arch-type long-span structures using a series of multimodal pushover analyses. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2013. 54(1): p. 27-37.
16. Vamvatsikos, D. and C.A. Cornell, Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2002. 31(3): p. 491-514.
17. P695, F., Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009.
18. Kalkan, E. and S.K. Kunnath. Method of modal combinations for pushover analysis of buildings. in Proc. of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2004.
19. McKenna, F., et al., Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees)[Computer Software], Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, CA. Available from: http://opensees. berkeley. edu/Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: NGA Database.(Accessed December, 2013). http://peer. berkeley. edu/peer_ground_motion_database, 2000.