Petrochemical wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor with behavior modify of membrane fouling through granule activated carbon: A case study

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
N. Karimi 1
H. Hazrati 2
E. fatehifar 3
1 MsC Student, Department of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Prof. Department of Chemical Engineering, sahand university of technology, Tabriz, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
In this study, petrochemical complex wastewater was investigated by submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR). Initial sludge was prepared from returned sludge of petrochemical complex wastewater treatment plant. Applied membrane is of micro-filtration type made of polyvinylidene fluoride with effective surface of 0.004 m2, porosity of 73% and nominal pore diameter of 0.1 μm. Particle size distribution (PSD), soluble microbial products (SMP), and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) for sludge were measured. In addition Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and EPS analysis were performed for determining the properties of the formed cake. Also was measured critical pressure for membrane in the MBR. The critical pressure value was 0.2 kPa. Therefore, the operating pressure was selected 0.12 kPa. This research was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the pilot worked for 35 days. The results showed that despite the membrane fouling in initial days, the permission of the membrane still had a good efficiency, and after each 7 days, the membrane was cleaned physically and chemically, which showed a recovery of permeate more than 90%. The COD removal efficiency was achieved more than 85% in MLSS=3000±300 mg / L and HRT=14-16 hours. In addition, the TSS and turbidity in the output were below 1 mg/L and 12 NTU, respectively. In the second phase, for reducing fouling, the granule activated carbon was added in the sludge. In the reactor containing activated carbon (R2), membrane fouling was carried out with lower rate and also flux drop was lower about 22% compared to reactor without activated carbon. This phenomenon was due to increasing sludge particle size, SMP reduction.

Keywords

Subjects

1- Pearce G. 2008 Introduction to membranes: An introduction to membrane bioreactors. Filtration & Separation, 45(1), 32-35.
2- Ravanchi M.T., Kaghazchi, T., and Kargari, A. 2009 Application of membrane separation processes in petrochemical industry: a review. Desalination, 235(1-3), 199-244.
3- Qin J.J., Oo, M.H., Tao, G., and Kekre A. 2007 Feasibility study on petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse using submerged MBR. Journal of Membrane Science, 293,161–166.

4- Fallah N., Bonakdarpour, B., Nasernejad, B., and Moghadam, M.A. 2010 Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT). Journal of hazardous materials, 178(1-3), 718-724.
5-Hazrati H., and Shayegan, J. 2016 Influence of suspended carrier on membrane fouling and biological removal of styrene and ethylbenzene in MBR. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 6459-68.
6- Hazrati H., Shayegan, J., and Mojtaba Seyedi, S. 2016 The effect of HRT and carriers on the sludge specifications in MBR to remove VOCs from petrochemical wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(46), 21730-21742.
7- Iorhemen O.T., Hamza, R.A., and Tay, J.H. 2017 Membrane fouling control in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) using granular materials. Bioresource Technology, 2409-24.
8- Satyawali Y., and Balakrishnan, M. 2009 Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater. Water Research, 43, 1577-1588.
9- Hazrati H., Jahanbakhshi, N., and Rostamizadeh, M. 2018 Fouling reduction in the membrane bioreactor using synthesized zeolite nano-adsorbents. J. Membr. Sci., 555, 455-462.
10- Jahanbakhshi N., Mousavi, S.A., and Farhadi, F. 2016 Fabrication and characterization of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene membranes with high antifouling properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Scienc, 133, 43857-43869.
11- Mirzavandi A., Hazrati, H., and Ebrahimi, S. 2019 Investigation of influence of temperature and solid retention time on membrane fouling in MBR. MEMBRANE WATER TREATMENT, 10(2), 179-189.
12- Meng F., Chae, S.-R., Drews, A., Kraume, M., Shin, H.-S., and Yang, F. 2009 Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water research, 43(6), 1489-1512.
13- Park H.-D., Chang, I.-S., and Lee, K.-J. (2015). Principles of membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment, CRC Press.
14- Alvarino T., Torregrosa, N., Omil, F., Lema, J., and Suarez, S. 2017 Assessing the feasibility of two hybrid MBR systems using PAC for removing macro and micropollutants. Journal of environmental management, 203, 831-837.
15- Lesage N., Sperandio, M., Cabassud, C. 2008 Study of a hybrid process: Adsorption on activated carbon/ membrane bioreactor for the treatment of an industrial wastewater, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 47, 303-307.
16- Jafarzadeh, Y., and Yegani, R. 2015 Analysis of fouling mechanisms in TiO2 embedded high density polyethylene membranes for collagen separation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 93, 684-595.
17- Behboudi A., Jafarzadeh, Y., and Yegani, R. 2017 Polyvinyl chloride/polycarbonate blend ultrafiltration membranes for water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 534, 18-24.
18- Yoon S.-H. (2015). Membrane bioreactor processes: principles and applications, CRC press
19- Federation W.E., and Association, A.P.H. 2005 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA.
20- Lowry O.H., Rosebrough, N.H., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J. 1951 Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological chemistry, 193, 265–275.
21- Dubois M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, K. Rebers, P.A. 1956 Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28, 350–357.
22- Zhao C., Xu, X., Chen, J., Wang, F. 2014 Highly effectively antifouling performance of PVDF/ graphen oxide composite membrane in membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. Desalination, 340, 59-66.
23- Deputy of planning and supervision of strategic of president, 2008 Classification guidelines of raw water quality, wastewater and reclaimed water for using of industrial and leisure (In Persian)
24- Meng F., Zhang, H., Yang, F., and Liu, L. 2007 Characterization of cake layer in submerged membrane bioreactor. Environmental science & technology, 41(11), 4065-4070.
25- Krzeminski P., Leverette, L., Malamis, S., and Katsou, E. 2017 Membrane bioreactors–a review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. Journal of Membrane Science, 527, 207-227.
26- Arabi S., and Nakhla, G. 2008 Impact of protein/carbohydrate ratio in the feed wastewater on the membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 324(1-2), 142-150.
27- Zhang J., Chua, H.C., Zhou, J., and Fane, A. 2006 Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of membrane science, 284(1-2), 54-66.
28- Judd S. (2010). The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment, Elsevier
29- Akram A., and Stuckey, D.C. 2008 Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). Process Biochemistry, 43(1), 93-102.
30- Bai R., and Leow, H. 2002 Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater—the effect of system operation parameters. Separation and Purification Technology, 29(2), 189-198.
31- Pollice A., Giordano, C., Laera, G., Saturno, D., and Mininni, G. 2006 Rheology of sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor. Environmental technology, 27(7), 723-732.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 20, Issue 1
March and April 2020
Pages 91-103