Traffic scenarios on Sadr Overpass: A multi-criteria analysis considering air pollution

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
T. Alisoltani 1
M. shafiepour motlagh 2
K. ashrafi 3
M. Habibian 4
1 Graduate Student, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant professor, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate professor, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology
Abstract
Traffic management in cities necessitates the implementation of comprehensive strategies and correct scheduling of demand management in order to reach sustainable development goals. Transportation is the main contributor to urban air pollution imposing high cost to communities. Emission from mobile sources in Tehran is responsible for 85 percent of the total air pollutant emissions. Therefore, assessment of emission rates in different districts may be used as the base for air quality management decisions. Due to the complexity of effective policies that lead to environmental sustainability for reducing the emissions of air pollutants caused by transportation using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approaches could be an effective and the most appropriate approach.

Sadr overpass is one of the east to west main corridors in Greater Tehran Area and embeds a large amount of traffic volume. Therefore, assessing different and alternative traffic scenarios and its modeling incorporating air pollution concerns, promotes imposition of the most environmentally preferred traffic demand management policies. This study aims to investigate different alternatives to access Sadr Overpass of Tehran using different ramps and estimating the air pollution caused by the traffic volumes in each access mode. These scenario alternatives have been evaluated using MCDM. Therefore, the different access routes via ramps of Sadr Overpass to its main lanes are considered in terms of the two formerly implemented scenarios. The first implemented scenario is defined as the air pollution caused by the traffic volume due to limitation of access that was implemented before 21 June of 2017. In this period of time, in the east to west direction, the limitation of access to Sadr Overpass was imposed via lower level Sadr ramp in between 7 to 10 AM and during the closure of this ramp, vehicles could access the overpass and Niayesh Tunnel via Qeytarieh and Kaveh ramps. In other side of the overpass, the first ramp leading the lower level is closed at 15 to 21 and vehicles could not access Sadr Expressway via this ramp. The second scenario is defined at the period of time that the limitation of access in both directions, was imposed all over during the day time permanently that is from 21 June 2017 till now. Air pollution caused by each mode of transportation is modeled using IVE that is an International Vehicle Emission Model to simulated emissions from motor vehicles. The IVE model uses local vehicle technology levels and its distribution and includes emission factors for estimating the air pollutants. Furthermore, these scenarios have been compared using Multiple-Criteria Decision Making approach and the evaluated criteria are the emission rates of motor vehicles, velocity and level of service (LOS) of the expressway. The results show that the evaluated scenarios are ranked as per their level of priority as the first and the second implemented scenarios, respectively. Also, it is shown that in the east to west direction, closure of lower level Sadr ramp in the morning peak time of traffic volume reduces the emission rates of CO pollutants by 10 percent in that time. Similarly, in the west to east direction, limiting the access to the lower level Sadr ramp during 16-17 hours reduces the CO emissions by 3.5 percent.

Keywords

Subjects

[1] A. Parchamdar, A. Astaneh, M.A. , Classification of pollutants emission index and the effect of different standards of light vehicles in Tehran, in: 4th International conference of environmental planning and management, 2017.
[2] M. Habibian, A. Rezaei, Accounting for systematic heterogeneity across car commuters in response to multiple TDM policies: case study of Tehran, Transportation, 44(4) (2017) 681-700.
[3] A. Rasooli, M. Safarzade, Optimal management of traffic congestion by intelligent acquisition of complications from intra-city passages (case study Sadr bridge), in: The first conference of Intelligent Transportation Systems in Tehran, the Ministry of Transportation and Road Administration, 2013.
[4] M. Shafie-Pour, A. Tavakoli, On-Road Vehicle Emissions Forecast Using IVE Simulation Model, International Journal of Environmental Research, 7(2) (2013) 367-376.
[5] A.R. Mamdouhi, B. Shirgir, Z. Ebadi Shivyari, Optimization of Highway Traffic Performance by Ramp Metering Control Method Usuing Mathematical Model, in: 11th International Railway Transportation Conference, Railway Transportation Association, 2009.
[6] Q.L. J. Du, F. Qiao, Impact of Different Ramp Metering Strategies on Vehicle Emissions Along Freeway Segments, Journal of Transport & Health, 9 (2018) S51.
[7] S. Dibaj, M. Habibian, Effect of cordon pricing on air pollution (Case study: commuting trips to the central part of Tehran), in: The 3rd National Conference On Air & Noise Pollution Management, Sharif University of Technology, 14 January 2015 - 15 January 2015.
[8] M. Habibian, K. Khanali, M. Shanazari, Assessing the Effect of Cordon Pricing Policy on Emission Reduction Benefit in Central Isfahan, (2018) 18-04816.
[9] M. Habibian, M. Ostadi Jafari, Assessing the role of transportation demand management policies on urban air pollution: A case study of Mashhad, Iran, in: U.S.-Iran Symposium on Air Pollution in Megacities, National Academies of Sciences and Engineering, Beckman Center in Irvine, CA, 3-5th Sep, CA, USA., 2013.
[10] D.H.N. Wang Q, Wang H, A smart MCDM Framework to evaluate the impact of air pollution on city sustainability: A Case Study from China Sustainability, 9(6), 911, (2017).
[11] S. Afandizadeh Zargari, M. Hajian, Method of evaluation of different options of transportation system in Tehran to reduce air pollution, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management, 12(3) (2001) 101-116.
[12] M.S. Fallah M., Taheri P., Akbarian M, Evaluating the effective factors on air pollution of Tehran and prioritizing the proposed solutions using TOPSIS method in: Third National Conference of Industrial Engineering Studies, Tehran, Iran, 2017.
[13] Tehran Traffic Control Company - Tehran Municipality
[14] K. Ahn, H. Rakha, A field evaluation case study of the environmental and energy impacts of traffic calming, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(6) (2009) 411-424.
[15] IVE Model User Manual .version 2.0.1 May 2008.
[16] I. Schifter, Diaz,L, Rodriguez,R, Cold start and chemical charecteristics of emissions from mobile sources in Mexico, Environmental Technology, (2010) 1241-1253.
[17] M. Naderi, V. Hosseini, Monitoring the quality of gasoline and diesel fuel in Tehran,Report number QM94/02/01/(U)/01, Technical Report of the Air Quality Control Company, 2011-2014.
[18] M. Mir Mohammadi, Effects of public transport development on reducing air pollution in terms of indicators, Report of the Center for Study and Planning of Tehran City, 2016.
[19] M.j. Ashgharpour, MultiCriteria Decision Making, in: t. edition (Ed.), Tehran University, Tehran, 1998.
[20] S.Z. Haghani M Traffic Engineering & Transpotration Planning, AVA publications, Tehran, 2016.
[21] HCM 2010 : highway capacity manual, Fifth edition. Washington, D.C. : Transportation Research Board, c2010-, 2010.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 19, Issue 6
November and December 2019
Pages 103-113