Optimal CFRP strengthening of RC frames based on reliability analysis

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran
2 M.sc. of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Abstract
One of the methods for the seismic strengthening in structural engineering is using FRP composites. These composite has some advantages such as increase in ductility, stiffness and lateral strength, the ability to adapt with the architecture, and also the minimum weight added to the structure. Uncertainty in the structure is due to reasons such as the lack of prediction of additional loads over the lifetime of the structure, the inadequate knowledge of the mechanical properties of the materials, the existence of human errors and the simplifications in analytical relations for modeling, and makes reliability analysis of structural inevitable. The First-Order Reliability Method (FORM) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) are the most common and accurate methods of reliability analysis. Structural reliability analysis leads to the construction of an acceptable safety grade structure. In this paper, an optimal pattern for reinforcing RC frame with FRP layers is presented using reliability analysis. Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are used to increase the shear strength of existing RC frame. The beams and columns are wrapped by the CFRP layers at the ends, and in the reinforcing patterns, the reinforced beams are assumed to be constant and the difference is in length of the reinforcement of the column. After verifying and ensuring the results of modeling, the seismic behavior of the 8-story RC frame was assessed by nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) with finite element program OpenSees under three far-field records earthquake from fault TABAS, Borah Peak and Imperial-Valley. Four random variables represented the variation in compressive strength of concrete, yield strength of steel, live load, and elasticity modulus of CFRP materials are defined and the limit state function defined to perform reliability analysis based on the maximum drift ratio inter-story. The reliability analysis of RC frame under three earthquake records and five reinforcement patterns was first determined using the Importance Sampling Method (ISM), and then the accuracy of the method was measured using MCS. Based on the results of the reliability analysis, the optimal length value corresponding to the maximum value of the reliability index ( ) for each earthquake record is determined. Survey results show that increasing the length of the reinforcement does not lead to an increase in the reliability index and even decreases with the inappropriate reinforcing length. The results of reliability analysis show that the number of layers of CFRP is not considered safe for Borah Peak record and requires more layers to reinforce. The optimum lengths of reinforcement in TABAS and Borah Peak earthquakes are 20% of the length of the column and in the Imperial-Valley record is 30% of the length of the column, while with a change of 5% of the length strengthening, the reliability index is significantly reduced. The most accurate method for analyzing reliability and calculating the probability of structural failure is MCS, but this method requires a large number of simulation samples to perform calculations. Which significantly reduces the number of simulation samples and the time to perform calculations by selecting the ISM method and the appropriate amount of random variables to begin the analysis.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] ACI, 440.2R-02, 2002 Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures American Concrete Institute.
[2] Bagheri, M., Miri, M., Shabakhty, N., 2014 Calculation of Fuzzy Structural Reliability Index Using α‐level Optimization Technique, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 43(4) (In Persian).
[3[ Bagheri, M., Miri, M., Shabakhty, N., 2017 Fuzzy time dependent structural reliability analysis using alpha level set optimization method based on genetic algorithm, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32:4173-4182.
[4[ Bagheri, M., Miri, M., Shabakhty, N., 2016 Fuzzy reliability analysis using a new alpha level set optimization approach based on particle swarm optimization, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 30:235-244.
[5] Gomes, H. M., Awruch A. M., 2004 Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis, Structural safety, 26:49-67.
[6] Deng, J., Gu, D., Li, X., Yue, Z. Q., 2005 Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network, Structural Safety, 27:25-48.
[7] Cheng, J., 2007 Hybrid genetic algorithms for structural reliability analysis, Computers & Structures, 85:1524-1533.
[8] Keshtegar, B., Bagheri, M., 2018 Fuzzy relaxed-finite step size method to enhance the instability of the fuzzy first-order reliability method using conjugate discrete map, Nonlinear Dynamics, 91:1443-1459.
[9] Choi, S.-K., Grandhi, R., Canfield, R. A., 2006 Reliability-based structural design, Springer Science & Business Media.
[10] Ibrahim, Y., 1991 Observations on applications of importance sampling in structural reliability analysis, Structural Safety, 9:269-281.
[11] Zio, E., Pedroni, N., 2010 An optimized Line Sampling method for the estimation of the failure probability of nuclear passive systems, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95:1300-1313.
[12] Miao, F., Ghosn, M., 2011 Modified subset simulation method for reliability analysis of structural systems, Structural Safety, 33:251-260.
[13] Hao, H., Li, Z., Shi, Y., 2015 Reliability analysis of RC columns and frames with FRP strengthening subjected to explosive loads, J.Perform. constr. Facil., 30(2):4015017.
[14] Osama, A., 2017 Structural reliability of biaxial loaded Short/Slender-Square FRP-confined RC columns, Construction and Building Materials, 151:370-382.
[15] Nasrollahzadeh, K., Aghamohammadi, R., 2018 Reliability analysis of shear strength provisions for FRP-reinforced concrete beams, 176:785-800.
[16] Zou, X., Wang, Q., Wu, J., 2018 Reliability-based performance design optimization for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings with fiber-reinforced polymer composites, Advances in Structural Engineering, 21:838-851.
[17] Zeng, Y., Botte, W., Caspeele, R., 2018 Reliability analysis of FRP strengthened RC beams considering compressive membrane action, Construction and Building Materials, 169:473-488.
[18] Osama, A., Bigaud, D., Riahi, H., 2018 Seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame structures strengthened with FRP laminates using a reliability-based advanced approach, Composites Part B: Engineering, 139:238-248.
[19] Taki, A., Firouzi, A., Mohammadzadeh, S., 2018 Life cycle reliability assessment of reinforced concrete beams shear‐strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer strips in accordance with fib bulletin 14, Structural Concrete.
[20] Ronagh, H. R., Eslami, A., 2013 Flexural retrofitting of RC buildings using GFRP/CFRP–A comparative study, Composites Part B: Engineering,46:188-196.
[21] Nowak, A., Collins, K., 2000 Reliability of Structures McGraw-Hill, Inc., Boston.
[22] Maes, M. A., Breitung, K., Dupuis, D. J., 1993 Asymptotic importance sampling, Structural Safety, 12:167-186.
[23] Hasofer, A. M., Lind, N. C., 1974 Exact and invariant second-moment code format, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics division, 100:111-121.
[24] Kiureghian, A. D., Stefano, M. D., 1991 Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis, Journal of engineering mechanics, 117:2904-2923.
[25] Papadrakakis, M., Papadopoulos, V., Lagaros, N. D., 1996 Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 136:145-163.
[26] Bucher, C. G., Bourgund, U., 1990 A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems, Structural safety,7:57-66.
[27] Rackwitz, R., Flessler, B., 1978 Structural reliability under combined random load sequences, Computers & Structures, 9:489-494.
[28] Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J., Park, R., 1988 Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete, Journal of structural engineering, 114:1804-1826.
[29] Barghian, M., Farzam, M., Ramazani,P., 2016 Interaction graphs of hollow concrete columns confined with FRP, Journal of Amirkabir Civil Engineering, 48(1):53-64. (In Persian)
[30] Hadi, M., 2006 Behaviour of FRP wrapped normal strength concrete columns under eccentric loading, Composite Structures, 72:503-511.
[31] Xiao, Y., Wu, H., 2003 Compressive behavior of concrete confined by various types of FRP composite jackets, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 22:1187-1201.
[32] Popovics, S., 1973 A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete, Cement and concrete research, 3:583-599.
[33] Hosseini Gelekolai, S. M. (2010). "Design of Soft Story in Reinforced Concrete Structure due to Removal of Masonry Infill Wall", Master of Science Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
[34] PEER Ground Motion Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Web Site: http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database.
[35] Permanent Committee for Revising the Standard 2800, “Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings”, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran, 2014. (In Persian)