Microstructural Assessment of the Effect of Sulfate Environments on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
M. amiri 1
P. tanideh 2
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
2 Master Student, Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas, Faculty of Engineering
Abstract
Background and Objective: Chemical attacks through concrete pores destroy concrete structures and reduce their structural integrity in sulfate environments. The durability of concrete in harsh environments is a crucial issue worldwide [1–3]. Specifically, environments like coastalareas, saline-alkali lands and salt lakes contain many sulfate ions,which could penetrate into the concrete foundation facilities like pier, bridge and tunnel [4]. It is generally accepted that the ingression of sulfate ions in concrete causes serious deterioration, such as cracking, expansion and strength loss [5]. This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the formation of gypsum and ettringit [6,7]. Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) concrete has long been used in construction of civil infrastructure and its deterioration over time due to sulphate attack has been widely observed and documented [1–4]. Investigations have revealed that the degradation of OPC concrete takes place due to reactions between cement hydration products and sulphate-bearing solutions. Degradation of concrete strength due to sulphate attack takes place when the calcium and hydroxide ions dissolve out of the matrix, causing an increase in porosity and permeability of the concrete surface [5]. Maintaining the durability of concrete structures against corrosion in acidic environments is an important challenge. Investigating concrete microstructure makes it possible to understand concrete porosity and structural composition in micro- and nano-scales, and makes concrete more concentrated, durable and strong. Accordingly, the present study is a microstructural analysis of the long- and short-term impacts of the conditions of different sulfate environments on concrete strength parameters.

Material and method: This study evaluated about 200 concrete samples. The samples were preserved for 3 months in simulated environments with 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, 5% and 7.5% sulfuric acid concentrations. Compressive strength, weight percentage, ultrasonic wave, permeability and pH change tests were then performed after 1, 3, 7, 14, 28 and 90 days on all the samples in the preserving environment. Images from the scanning electronic microscope (SEM) test were used for microstructural analysis.

Result and discussion: The results indicate that the strength of samples preserved in the sulfate environment compared to the control sample depended on the amount of sulfate. In the majority of sulfate attacks, the most vulnerable compounds to react with waterborne sulfate ions are calcium hydroxide (CH) and phases containing aluminium, such as AFm (e.g. monosulfate) and unreacted C3A. After 28 days, the compressive strength of samples preserved in the 5% concentration sulfuric acid sulfate environment was reduced by about 63% compared to control samples. This reduction in compressive strength is inversely related to the results from the ultrasonic test of samples preserved in the 5% percent concentration sulfate environment. The environment’s wave velocity increased by 27% after 90 days. Consequently, expansion and cracking result in severely compromised structural integrity of the attacked concrete. Cracking also leads to further propagation of the attack. The increase in ultrasonic wave velocity of samples was accompanied by a loss of strength and mass due to destruction of concrete strength structures, including the C-S-H nanostructure, and formation of ettringite due to exposing samples to sulfate.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Liu, H., Q. Zhang, V. Li, H. Su, and C. Gu, 2017, Durability study on engineered cementitious composites (ECC) under sulfate and chloride environment. Construction and Building Materials, 133,171-181.
2. Shaheen, F. and B. Pradhan, 2017, Influence of sulfate ion and associated cation type on steel reinforcement corrosion in concrete powder aqueous solution in the presence of chloride ions. Cement and Concrete Research, 91,73-86.
3. Yang, Y., Y. Zhang, W. She, N. Liu, and Z. Liu, 2018, In situ observing the erosion process of cement pastes exposed to different sulfate solutions with X-ray computed tomography. Construction and Building Materials, 176, 556-565.
4. Yan, X., L. Jiang, M. Guo, Y. Chen, Z. Song, and R. Bian, 2019, Evaluation of sulfate resistance of slag contained concrete under steam curing. Construction and Building Materials, 195, 231-237.
5. Yuan, J., Y. Liu, Z. Tan, and B. Zhang, 2016, Investigating the failure process of concrete under the coupled actions between sulfate attack and drying–wetting cycles by using X-ray CT. Construction and Building Materials, 108, 129-138.
6. Xiong, C., L. Jiang, Z. Song, R. Liu, L. You, and H. Chu, 2014, Influence of cation type on deterioration process of cement paste in sulfate environment. Construction and Building Materials, 71,158-166.
7. Aye, T. and C.T. Oguchi, 2011, Resistance of plain and blended cement mortars exposed to severe sulfate attacks. Construction and Building Materials, 25(6), 2988-2996.
8. Gruyaert, E., P. Van den Heede, M. Maes, and N. De Belie, 2012, Investigation of the influence of blast-furnace slag on the resistance of concrete against organic acid or sulphate attack by means of accelerated degradation tests. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(1), 173-185.
9. Albitar, M., M.M. Ali, P. Visintin, and M. Drechsler, 2017, Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 136, 374-385.
10. Sun, J. and Z. Chen, 2018, Influences of limestone powder on the resistance of concretes to the chloride ion penetration and sulfate attack. Powder Technology, 338,725-733.
11. Mehta, P.K. and Monteiro, P.J.M. 2006,Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, ed. McGraw-Hill. New York, USA. 659.
12. Basheer, P., S. Chidiact, and A. Long, 1996, Predictive models for deterioration of concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials, 10(1), 27-37.
13. Bertron, A., 2013, Methods for testing cementitious materials exposed to organic acids, in Performance of Cement-Based Materials in Aggressive Aqueous Environments., Springer,355-387.
14. Marchand, J., I. Odler, and J.P. Skalny, 2003, Sulfate attack on concrete. CRC Press.
15. Santhanam, M., M.D. Cohen, and J. Olek, 2001, Sulfate attack research—whither now? Cement and concrete research,. 31(6), 845-851.
16. Živica, V.r., 1998, Experimental principles in the research of chemical resistance of cement based materials. Construction and Building Materials,. 12(6-7), 365-371.
17. Tixier, R. and B. Mobasher, 2003 Modeling of damage in cement-based materials subjected to external sulfate attack. I: formulation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,. 15(4), 305-313.
18. Tarighat, M, M, Mohamadi, 2018, Thermodynamic simulation of sulfate attack in cement mortars. Modares Civil Engineering, 18(2), 159-168. (In Persian)
19. Monteiro, P.J. and K.E. Kurtis, 2003, Time to failure for concrete exposed to severe sulfate attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(7),987-993.
20. Farokhzad, R., S. Yaseri, M.H. Entezarian, and A. Yavari, 2016, Investigating Effects of Sulfates on Compressive Strength of Different Types of Pozzolan Concrete and Measuring Penetration Rate by Ultrasound Tests at Different Ages. (In Persian)
21. Mahdikhani, M., A. Ramzanpour, A. Ghyasvand, and M. Kamali, 2010, Durability of Concrete and Mortars Containing Lim Stone Powder in High Density Sulfate Enviroment. Concrete research, 3(2),27-37. (In Persian)
22. ASTM, . 1984, American Society for Testing and Materials.
23. Davidovits, J., 2008, Geopolymer chemistry and applications.: Geopolymer Institute.
24. ASTM, C. , 2009, 597, Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
25. Ouhadi, V., Amiri, M and Zangane, M, 2016, Microstructural assessment of lime consumption rate and pozzolanic reaction progress of a lime-stabilized dispersive soil. Modares Civil Engineering journal, 16(1), 11-22. (In Persian)
26. Hong, S.-Y. and F.P. Glasser, 2002, Alkali sorption by CSH and CASH gels: Part II. Role of alumina. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(7),1101-1111.
27. Yousuf, M., A. Mollah, R.K. Vempati, T.-C. Lin, and D.L. Cocke, 1995, The interfacial chemistry of solidification/stabilization of metals in cement and pozzolanic material systems. Waste management, 15(2), 137-148.
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 19, Issue 6
November and December 2019
Pages 1-14