Evaluation of seismic performance and determine performance levels for dual steel moment- shear wall system

Authors
1 1
2 P.h.D Student, Shakhes pajouh, Esfahan, Iran
Abstract
Dual system of. moment frame and steel sheer wall is interesting to researchers for the good performance in absorbing lateral forces such as earthquakes and for this reason used in normal and high-rise buildings in earthquake-prone countries is used. This system, has many advantages in comparison with the conventional lateral load systems. Some advantages of steel plate shear walls rather than the other systems could be mentioned as: High ductility, strength and stiffness. Being new to this system in terms of seismic performance and functional levels and uncertainty in the seismic characteristics of the other side has created dispersion in the results of previous research.

Evaluation and comparison of seismic performance of dual steel plate shear wall system is subject to far-fault ground motions is the aim of this study. To gain the aim, a four story frame with 14m in height is selected in 4-storey building with a height of 3.5 meters per floor. This building loading according to 2800 standard ad seismic design by AISC360-10 cod and AISC Design Guide 20. To verify the finite element model was used to model the driver and co-workers.

The entire infill plate and boundary elements were using shell elements. The fundamental period of the structure T was estimated 0.39 s. Twenty real earthquake records have been used far-fault acceleration with a magnitude 6 to 7.5 on the soil type II for Incremental dynamic analysis with nonlinear behavior in geometry and material specimen. The real earthquake records which represented a scenario of the probable earthquakes have been gradually increased in their intensity and applied to the frame steel plate shear walls to specify the Seismic behavior. An engineering demand parameters which appropriately characterizes the seismic response of the dual steel shear wall system and its related damage is selected. The IDA curves have been drawn for two Intensity measure the 5%-damped first-mode spectral acceleration Sa (T1; 5%) and Peak ground acceleration PGA and max inter-story drift ratio as an engineering demand parameter. each records were applied to the models incrementally by equal steps of 0.1 for IM and max inter-story drift ratio was obtained from the numerical results.The dispersion of the results by the standard deviation obtained for both intensity measured. Two seismic performance level immediate occupancy (IO) and Collapse Prevention (CP) were evaluated by conceptual definitions, Research and von Mises stress. The following dependence results were evaluated on the characteristics of records based on the frequency content of Acceleration and duration of acceleration.The finite element analyses show that the Damage Index in the elastic stage until the Instability a considerable dispersion of the results for different records. Frame at IO performance level show elastic behavior and a quick return to the original state structures and stiff behavior see and there were no fixed displacement but at CP performance level after a few seconds the system into the fixed displacement behavior. In dual steel plate shear wall system the first floor wall plate the most energy absorption through surrender among the other floor.

Keywords

Subjects


[1] k n h Y ke oto k “E per ent l study on thin steel shear walls and particular bracing un er ltern t e hor zont l lo ” Prel n ry eport IABSE. Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on Well-defined Repeated Loads, Lisbon, Portugal, 1973, 185-191.##
[2] Tromposch, E.W, and Kulak L “ y l n t t beh or o th n p nel teel pl te he r w ll ” Un o Alberta, Dep. Civ. Eng., Struct. Eng. Rep. n 145 Apr. 1987, 158p.##
[3] ez “ e Beh or o teel Pl te he r W ll by h ke ble e t n ” Ph D D ert t on University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 1999.##
[4] Bhowmick, A. Grondin, G. & Driver, R.; “E t t n un ent l per o o teel pl te he r w ll ”; En neer n tru ture 33 6 3-1893 ##
[5] Sabelli, Rafael. Bruneau, Michel. Driver Robert, G.; “ teel Pl te he r W ll n the Up o n I e Pro on n 9 n n t n r 6”; Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), (2008)##
[6] Jian-Guo Nie, Li Zhu, Jian-Sheng Fan, Yi-Lung o ; “L ter l re t n e p city of stiffened steel plate 0 1 2 3 4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Story Displacement (m) MAX MIN MEDIAN STDEV.P MEDIAN -STDEV MEDIAN +STDEV 0 1 2 3 4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 Story Displacement (m) MAX MIN MEDIAN STDEV.P MEDIAN -STDEV MEDIAN +STDEV 28 he r w ll ”; Journ l o h n-Walled structures. (2013)##
[7] W n Y n W h Y Xu J ; “ e behaviors of steel plate shear wall structures with on tru t on et l n ter l ”; Journ l o Constructional Steel Research 107 (2015) 194–210.##
[8] Bertero n Bre ler B “De n n Engineering Decisions: Failure Criteria (Limit t te ” Proc., of 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India. 1977.##
[9] Luco, N. and cornell, C.A, Effects of random connections fractures on demands and reliability for a 3- story pre-Northrige SMRF structure, Proceedings of the 6th U.S. National conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No.244.EERL, EL Cerrito, Seattle, (1988).##
[10] Krawinkler, H.,Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No. 45, The John A.Blume Earthquake engineering Center, Standford University of America, VOL. 94, NO.5, Paper No.1943-1953, (2004).##
[11] Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings: Standard no.2800, 4rd edition, Building and Housing Research Center, (2014). ##
[12] American Institute of Steel Construction, ANSI/AISC 360-10 an American National Standard, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings dated 22 Jun 2010.##
[13] American Institute of Steel Construction, Design Guide 20: Steel Plate Shear Walls.##
[14] I ULI b qu n ly u er’ nu l er on 6.14. 2011, SIMULIA,The Dassault Systèmes, Realistic Simulation,USA.##
[15] Driver, R.G., Kulak, G.L., Kennedy, D.J.L., and Elw E “ e Behaviour do Steel Plate Shear W ll ” tru tur l En neer n eport No Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering, University of Alberta, dmonton, Canada 1997.##
[16] PEER Strong Ground Motion Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Web site: http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat.##
[17] Shome,N.and cornell,C.A., probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures, Report No.RMS-35,RMS Program ,Stanford university ,Stanford ,(1999).##
[18] Brendon A. Bradley, Misko Cubrinovski,Rajesh P Dh k l re ory e “Inten ty e ure or the e re pon e o p le oun t on ” journ l o l DynamicsandEarthquakeEngineering 1058- 1046(2009)29.##
[19] Bianchini, M., Diotallevi, P.P., and Baker, J.W. 9 “Pre t on o nel t tru tur l response using n er e o pe tr l eler t on ” th Int on on Structural Safety and Reliability, Osaka, Japan.##
[20] t ko D “ e per or n e capacity and reliability of structures as seen through n re ent l yn n ly ” Ph D ert t on Stanford University, Stanford,CA.##
[21] Tso, W.K., Zhua, T.J., Heidebrechta, A.C. (1992). “En neer n pl t on o roun ot on / r t o” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 11(3), 133- 144.##
[22] Rathje, E.M., Abrahamson, N.A., Bray, J.D. 99 “ pl e requen y ontent E t te o e rthqu ke roun ot on ” Journ l o Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(2), 150-159.##
[23] Trifunac, M.D., and Brady, A 97 “ tu y o the Duration of Strong Earthquake Ground ot on ”Bullet n o the e olo l o ety o America, Vol.65, PP 581-626.##
[24] Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete BuildingsSeismic Safety Commission, State of California, 1996.##
[25] American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency (1997). NEHRP GUIDELINES FOR THE SEISMIC REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS (FEMA Publication 273). Virginia: Author##
[26] American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Fema 356). Virginia: Author##
[27] American Society of Civil Engineers (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings Virginia.##
[28] Tirca, L., Tremblay, R., Incremental dynamic analysis of multi-storey concentrically braced steel frames, Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0- 415-56326-0, (2009)##
[29] Dr er “ e Beh our o teel Pl te he r W ll ” Ph D D ert t on Dep rt ent o l and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, 1997##
[30] Behbahanifard, M.R, Grondin, G.Y., and Elwi, E “E per ent l n Nu er l In e t t on o teel Pl te he r W ll ”” tru tur l En neer n eport No. 254, Department of civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, dmonton, Canada 2003##
[31] Sabouri- ho n holh k ; “ y l te t on two specimens of three-story ductile steel plate shear w ll”; eport o e t Bu l n n Hou n e e r h Center (BHRC), (2006) 167 page