Assessment of concrete core strength with and without steel bars

Authors
1 Ph.D. student Faculty of Engineering University of Guilan, Rasht- Iran
2 Associate professor Faculty of Engineering University of Guilan, Rasht- Iran
Abstract
The concrete compressive strength is a suitable index to ensure the quality of concrete while the construction is underway. The core samples, which represent the potential strength of concrete, are prepared, cured, and tested according to the relevant standard codes and specifications. On the other hand, determination of the actual strength of concrete in a structure is not easy because it depends on the history of the curing procedure, the adequacy of concrete compaction, and the casting method. Therefore, the question that has always attracted the attention of designers is if the standard test specimens can represent the in-situ strength of concrete. Arriving at the answer to this question becomes even more important when the strengths of standard test specimens are lower than the specified strength. In this case, either the strength of concrete in the structure is lower than the design value or the specimens do not actually represent the concrete strength in the structure. In such cases, the problem would be addressed by drilling and testing some core specimens from the suspected structural member. In addition, there may be no standard specimens at a late age, and it may be necessary to determine the current strength of the structure.Concrete core test is always regarded as an important issue in the area of concrete industry to evaluate the in-situ concrete strength, and sometimes it becomes the unique tool for safety assessment of existing concrete structures. Core test is, therefore, introduced in most building codes. The presence of rebar in the cores affects the results of testing; accordingly, some codes specify that no bars are allowed to be present in the cores, while others account for the bars by introducing a correction factor. In the present experimental research, the parameters that exert significant effects on the strength of the cores containing rebar are examined. To that end, 112 plain and reinforced concrete beams with the bars of 10- and 16-mm diameter (with different arrangements) and water-to-cement ratios of 0.4 and 0.55 have been created. The beams have been kept and cured under air-dried conditions. In order to perform the compression tests, 988 concrete cores of 7.5- and 10-cm diameters with aspect ratios of 1 and 2 have been drilled at 14, 28, and 56 days of age. In the majority of cases, as the water-to-cement content increases from 0.4 to 0.55, there is a larger amount of strength loss in the cores containing the rebar as compared to those without any rebar. The strength of the cores declines by increasing the concrete cover for the bars. For the cores containing a single bar, the reduction which is resulted in the strength in comparison to that of the plain concrete cores is more dramatic in the cores having a bar of larger diameter. On the other hand, the amount of strength drop increases by increasing the number of bars. The largest drop in the strength values, amounting to 23 percent of the plain-concrete core strength, is observed in the concrete cores having two 16-mm bars. Furthermore, the cores containing eccentric rebar show a greater reduction in comparison to the cores with no eccentric rebar.

Keywords


[1] Arioz, O.; Tuncan, M. ; Ramyar, K. ; Tuncan, A. “Assessing Concrete Strength by Means of Small Diameter Cores”; Construction and Building Material 2008, 22, 981-988.
[2] Nikbin, I.; Eslami, M.; Rezvani, D. S. M. “An Experimental Comparative Survey on the Interpretation of Concrete Core Strength Results”; Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2009, 37, 445–456.
[3] Neville, A. M. “Properties of Concrete”; Addison-Wesley, UK, 1995.
[4] Bungey, J. H. “Determining Concrete Strength by Using Small Diameter Cores’’; Mag. Concrete Res. 1979, 107, 91–98.
[5] Bartlett, F. M.; MacGregor, J. G. “Effect of Core Diameter on Concrete Core Strengths’’; ACI Mater. J. 1994, 91, 460–470.
[6] Bartlett, F. M.; MacGregor, J. G. “Effect of Core Length-to Diameter Ratio on Concrete Core Strengths’’; ACI Mater. J. 1994, 91, 339-348.
[7] Bartlett, F. M.; MacGregor, J. G. “Effect of Moisture Condition on Concrete Core Strengths’’; ACI Mater. J. 1993, 90, 227–236.
[8] Bartlett, F. M. “Precision of In-Place Concrete Strengths Predicted Using Core Strength Correction Factors Obtained by Weighed Regression Analysis’’; Struct. Safety 1997, 19, 397–410.
[9] Bartlett, F. M.; Mac Gregor, J. G. “Cores from High-Performance Concrete Beams’’; ACI Mater. J. 1993, 91, 567–576.
[10] ASTM C 42-90 “Test for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete”; Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2008.
[11] Khoury, Sh.; Aliabdo, A.; Ghazy, A. “Reliability of Core Test–Critical Assessment and Proposed New Approach’’; Alexandria Eng. J. 2014, 53, 169–184.
[12] BS EN 12504-1 “Testing Concrete in Structures, Cored Specimens, Taking, Examining and Testing in Compression”; 2009.
[13] ACI Committee 228 “Nondestructive Test Methods for the Evaluation of Concrete in Structures 2008’’, American Concrete Institute, 2008.
 [14] ACI Committee 214.4-03 “Guide for Obtaining Cores and Interpreting Compressive Strength Results’’; American Concrete Institute, 2003, 16pp [2013].
[15] Dolce, M.; Masi, A.; Ferrini, M. “Estimation of the Actual In-Place Concrete Strength in Assessing Existing RC Structures’’; The Second International FIB Congress, June 5–8, 2006, Naples, Italy.
[16] Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), Eurocode 8 Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance Part 3. “Assessment and Retrofitting of Building”; EN 1998-3, 2005, Brussels.
[17] Concrete Society “Assessment of In-Situ Concrete Strength Using Data Obtained from Core Testing’’; Concrete advice 2013, 47.
[18] Samarin, A.; Malhotra, V. M. ; Carino, N. J. “Combined Methods Handbook on Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete’’; 2004.
[19] Malhotra, V. M.; Amer, J. “Contract Strength Requirements-Cores Versus in Situ Evaluation”; Concrete Research Institute1977, 74, 163-72.
[20] Gaynor, R. D. “Ready Mixed Concrete. Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete Making Materials”; ASTM Special Publication 169B, American Society for Testing and Materials 1978, 471–502.


[21] Petersons, N. “Strength of Concrete in Finished Structures”; Transactions No. 232, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1994, 189 pp. Also, Reprint No.26, Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, Stockholm.
[22] Concrete Society “Concrete Core Testing for Strength”; Technical Report 1976, 11, 44.
[23] Loo, Y. H. “Effects of Embedded Reinforcement on Measured Strength of Concrete Cylinders”; Concrete Research Institute 1989, 146, 11-18.
[24] Wright, P. J. F. “Variations in the Strength of Portland Cement”; Concrete Research Institute 1958, 10, 123-.
[25] Tadayon, M.; Moghadam, H. T. P.; Tadayon M. H. “Effect of Rebar on Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores”; 3rd International Conference on Concrete & Development
[26] Madandoust , R; Bungey, J; Ghavidel, R . “Prediction of the concrete compressive strength by means of core testing using GMDH-type neural network and ANFIS models”; Computational Materials Science 51 (2012) 261–272.
[27] ASTM C 192/C 192M – 02 “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory”; Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.02.
[28] ASTM C 143/C 143M – 03“Standard Test Method for
Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete”; Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.02.
 [29] Montgomery, D.C, “ Design and Analysis of Experiments”; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., eighth ed., Arizona State University,2013.