Study of the SBAR performance in COD removal of Petroleum and MTBE

Authors
Tarbiat Modares Univ.
Abstract
The petroleum refineries, water are used for different purposes, such as extraction of contaminants. Some of these pollutants such as petroleum and Methyl Tertiary Butyl ether (MTBE) can be noted that have less biodegradability than other organic compounds. Discharge of these pollutants into water, and the presence of them in drinking water make huge environmental concerns.
A sequencing airlift reactor (SBR) along with an internal riser is called sequencing batch airlift reactor (SBAR); it has a similar structure to SBR and purifies wastewater with a certain temporal cycle in a single reactor. The SBAR system, which is used along with granules to treat wastewater, is known as granule sequencing batch airlift reactor (GSBAR). Using this system for biodegrading requires a high concentration of biomass (aerobic granules.
In recent years, several studies have been conducted on the use of aerobic biogranules. Mousavi et al., examined the removal of phenol with an initial concentration of 1000 mg/L from saline wastewater using GSBAR with aerobic granules 2 mm in size. The results indicated that 99% of phenol was removed. Bao et al., studied the effect of temperature on the formation of aerobic granules and on the removal of nutrients by SBAR system. The granules had an average diameter of 3–4 mm, density of 1.036 g/mL, sludge volume index of 37 mL/g, and sedimentation rate of 18.6–65.1 cm/min. The input load rate of COD, NH4–N, and PO4–P was 1.2–2.4, 0.122, and 0.012–0.024 kg/m3/day, respectively and the removal efficiency at low temperatures was 90.6–95.4, 72.8–82.1, and 95.8–97.9%, respectively. Taheri et al., examined the formation of aerobic granules in SBR for treating saline wastewater. In this study, the granules were 3–7 mm in size, had a fall speed of 0.9–1.35 cm/s, and density of 32-60 g/L. Using aerobic granules with a diameter of 1–2 mm to biologically restore 2, 4-di-chlorophenol with an initial concentration of 4.8 mg/L, Wang et al., achieved the removal efficiency of 95% and 94% for COD and di-chlorophenol, respectively. Siroos Rezaei et al. reported that COD removal efficiency of synthetic wastewater was 95% with the glucose carbon source in six 4-h cycles with a loading rate of 1500 mg/L in SBAR system using aerobic granules. The new granules had different diameters in the range of 0.5–5 mm, high sedimentation ability, and SVI of 100 mL/g. Ghaderi et al., investigated the performance of the biofilm reactor and SBR in removing formaldehyde from wastewater. The results revealed that removal efficiency of CODs less than 200 mg/L was 100% and removal efficiency of CODs between 200–450 mg/L was 90% after 48 h.
The aim of this study was evaluating the ability of SBAR system in quick produce of granules and achieving high removal of petroleum and MTBE in a short time. For this purpose, 2 similar SBAR systems with Circular cross-section were used. Outer Cylinder's diameter and length was respectively 8cm and 110 and the internal riser's diameter and length was respectively 4 cm and 90 cm. In the first system (R1) petroleum was treated in 6 hours and in the second system (R2) MTBE wastewater was treated in 4 hours. In COD equivalent to 600 mg/L, the removal efficiency of R1 and R2 were equal to 81.1 and 84.2%. These values were respectively 82.8 and 90% in COD equivalent 500 mg/L. Consider to granules changes, optimal COD was respectively equivalent to 600 and 500 mg/L in R1 and R2. By reducing retention time to 5 and 3 hours in R1 and R2, removal efficiency of pollutants in optimal COD of each system was respectively 77.8 and 90 %. The first granules were observed in the seventh day of operating system. During this period, the size of the granules increased to 1.3 and 0.6 mm in R1 and R2. Density and velocity of the granules were in the range of 0.0252-1.1998 gr/mL and 3.02-3.32 cm/s in R1 and 0.05-0.06502 gr/mL and 0.4-0.9 cm/s in R2. SVI was in the range of 42-65 mL/g, pH and DO was in the range of 6.8-7.2 and 2-6 mg/L and ORP was always above 100 mV.

Keywords


[1] Speight James G. 2014 The chemistry and technology of petroleum, Fifth Edition, Berkeley, California, CRC Press.
[2] Mizzouri N. Sh. Shaaban Md. Gh. 2013 Kinetic and hydrodynamic assessment of an aerobic purification system for petroleum refinery wastewater treatment in a continuous Regime, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 83 (2013),1-9.
[3] Taghipour Sh. 2015 Study of GSBAR capability in petroleum wastewater treatment, MSc thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (In Persian).
[3] Rezaie M. 2014 Study of GSBAR capability in MTBE treatment, MSc thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (In Persian).
[5] Analía R., Darío D., Jacobo S. 2015 Removal of MTBE in columns filled with modified natural zeolites, Procedia Materials Science, 8 (2015), 375 –382.
[6] El-Naas M.H., AlZuhair S., Abu Alhaija M. 2010 Reduction of COD in refinery wastewater through adsorption on date-pit activated carbon, Hazardous Materials, 173 (2010), pp.750–757.
[7] Diya’uddeen B.H., Wan Daud W.M.A., Abdul Aziz A.R. 2011 Treatment technologies for petroleum refinery effluents: A review, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 89 (2011), 95–105.
[8] Ebrahimi M., Shams Ashaghi K., Engel L., Willershausen D., Mund P., Bolduan P., Czermak P. 2009 Characterization and application of different ceramic membranes for the oil-field produced water treatment, Desalination, 245 (2009), 533–540.
[9] Hao M., Bai Z., Wang H., Liu W. 2013 Removal of oil from electric desalting wastewater using centrifugal contactors, Petroleum Science and Engineering, 111 (2013), 37-41.
[10] Gao D., Liua L., lianga H., Wuc W.M. 2011 Comparison of four enhancement strategies for aerobic granulation in sequencing batch reactors, Hazardous Materials, 186 (2011) 320–327.
[11] Santo C.E., Vilar V.J.P., Botelho C.M.S., Bhatnagar A., Kumar E., Boaventura R.A.R. 2012 Optimization of coagulation-flocculation and flotation parameters for the treatment of a petroleum refinery effluent from a Portuguese plant, Chemical Engineering, 183 (2012), 117-123.
 [12] Misiti T., Tezel U., Pavlostathis S.G. Fate and effect of naphthenic acids on oil refinery activated sludge wastewater treatment systems, Water Research, 47 (2013), 449-460.
[13] Rastegar S.O., Mousavi S.M., Shojaosadati S.A., Sheibani S. 2011 Optimization of petroleum refinery effluent treatment in a UASB reactor using response surface methodology, Hazardous Materials, 197 (2011), 26-32.
[14] Schneider E.E., Cerqueira A.C.F.P., Dezotti M. 2011 MBBR evaluation for oil refinery wastewater treatment with post-ozonation and BAC for wastewater reuse, Water Science and Technology, 63 (1), 143-148.
[15] Levchuk I., Bhatnagar A., Sillanpää M. 2014 Overview of technologies for removal of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) from water, Science of the Total Environment, 476–477 (2014), 415–433.
[16] The California MTBE Research Partnership 2006 Removal of MTBE from drinking water using air stripping: case studies, National Water Research Institute, California.
[17] Behpour M., Atouf V. 2012 Study of the photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline S, N-codoped TiO2 thin films and powders under visible and sunlight irradiation. Applied Surface Science, 258 (2012), 6595–601.
[18] Wu T. 2011 Electrochemical removal of MTBE from water using the iridium dioxide coated electrode. Separation and Purification Technology, 79, 216–20.
[19] Rosell M., Finsterbusch S., Jechalke S., Hübschmann T., Vogt C., Richnow HH. 2010 Evaluation of the effects of low oxygen concentration on stable isotope fractionation during aerobic MTBE bio-degradation. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 309–15.
[20] Moghaddam S.S., Moghaddam M.R.A. 2015. Cultivation of aerobic granules under different pre-anaerobic reaction times in sequencing batch reactors. Separation and Purification Technology, 142, 149–154.
[21] Miao, M.S., Zhang, Y.J., Shu, L., Zhang, J., Kong, Q., Li, N. 2014 Development and characterization of the 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP) aerobic degrading granules in sequencing batch airlift reactor, International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 95, 61-66.
[22] Rosman N.H., Anuar A.N., Chelliapan S., Din M.F.M., Ujang Z. 2014 Characteristics and performance of aerobic granular sludge treating rubber wastewater at different hydraulic retention time, Bioresource Technology, 161, 155-161.

[23] Ghaderi F., Ayati B., Comparison of MBBR and SBAR in treating toxic formaldehyde wastewater, Journal of Civil & Environment Engineering, 44 (1), 99-105 (In Persian).


[24] Siroos Rezaie L. 2009 Effect of chitosan on granulation accelerating in GSBAR, MSc thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (In Persian).
[25] Ayati B. 2005 Determination of mathematical model in treating cellulosic wastewater, Ph.D. thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (In Persian).
[26] APHA, AWWA, WPCF. 2012 Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Twentieth Edition. Washington DC, American Public Health Association Press.
[27] Rahimi M. Gh. 2013 Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) removal from wastewater by using UV/MBBR combined system, MSc thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran (In Persian).
[28] Diya’uddeen B.H., Pouran S.R., Aziz A.R.A., Nashwan S.M., Daud W.M.A.W., Shaaban M.G. 2014. Hybrid of Fenton and sequencing batch reactor for petroleum refinery wastewater treatment, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 25, 186-191.
[29] Long B., Yang C., Pu W., Yang J., Liu F., Zhang L., Zhang J., Cheng K. 2015 Tolerance to organic loading rate by aerobic granular sludge in a cyclic aerobic granular reactor, Bioresource Technology, 182 (2015), 314–322.
[30] Adav S., Lee D.-J., Lai J.Y. 2007 Effects of aeration intensity on formation of phenol-fed aerobic granules and extracellular polymeric substances, AppliedMicrobiology and Biotechnology, 77 (1), 175–182.
[31] Santos, B., Galinha, C.F., Crespo, J.G., ‌Santos, M.A., Velizarov, S., Prediction of polar oil and grease contamination levels in refinery wastewater through multivariate statistical modeling, Separation and Purification Technology, vol.119, 2013, pp.51–57.
[32] Baloch, M.I., Akunna, J.C., Kierans M., Collier, P.J., Structural analysis of anaerobic granules in a phase separated reactor by electron microscopy, Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, 2008, pp. 922–929.
[33] Taheri, E., Khiadani, M., Amin, M., M., Nikaeen, M., Hassanzadeh, A., Treatment of saline wastewater by a sequencing batch reactor with emphasis on aerobic granule formation, Bioresource Technology, vol. 111, 2014, pp. 21-26