Analysis of time series in hydrological processes using chaos theory (Case study: Monthly rainfall of Urmia Lake)

Authors
S. Mousavi
S. Mousavi
Professor
Abstract
Scientific method for correct recognition and understanding of the hydrologic phenomena is investigation of their simple models. Generally, a model is a simple representation of a complex system. In mathematical models, behavior of the system is described by a series of mathematical equations, along with logical relationships between variables and parameters. Despite the various proposed mathematical models for modeling of the hydrologic phenomena, there is not a unique approach in this respect. This might be due to spatial and temporal variability of hydrologic phenomena and also lack of mathematical tools for extraction of proper structure for these phenomena. These variations are the result of dependability of the phenomena on different components. This problem has caused the past researches on hydrologic modeling to view the situation as random and probabilistic. The performance of most natural phenomena, including hydrologic problems, in short time scales, to be viewed as completely random and without any trend. But, with a change in time scale, and using sophisticated models, a type of interval and order will be observed. Nowadays, researchers believe that hydrologic phenomena, which have dynamic and nonlinear nature, could be better analyzed by nonlinear and deterministic chaotic models. Hydrologic components in lakes have non-linear and dynamic nature. But, since the changes that these components create in the lakes don’t happen suddenly, it is possible to study and predict some of these elements in the hydrologic cycle. Nowadays, with the evolution of computer models, it is believed that analysis, modeling and control of complex natural phenomena, including hydrologic processes, could be better performed with chaotic models than probabilistic models. Studying the hydrologic components in analysis of the water resources systems, such as lakes, is very important in their quantitative and qualitative operation and management. Due to the importance of precipitation in variations of water level in Urmia Lake, located in north-western Iran, the chaos theory could be a powerful approach to analyze and model the complex behavior of such phenomena. Investigation of chaotic or random behavior of rainfall time series in the lake, for the choice of the best suited rainfall simulation approach, is an important and controversial issue that has been dealt with in this research. First, using the correlation dimension method (CDM), the monthly rainfall time series of Urmia Lake was analyzed over a period of 40 years (1967-2007). After calculating the delay time using average mutual information (AMI) and also calculation of the embedding dimension using false nearest neighbor (FNN) algorithm, the phase space was reconstructed and then the correlation dimension was determined. Then, by using Lyapunof exponent and Fourier power spectrum, the existence of chaos was investigated. Results revealed that presence of chaos in the rainfall time series of Urmia Lake is evident with the non-integer CDM of 2.56, positive value of Lyapunof exponent (maximum of about 2.5) and broad band Fourier power spectrum. Consequently, the system behavior is regular; in other words, the system is not considered random. In such a system, chaos theory has the ability to extract short-term time series from long-term records. In addition, the existence of low-dimensional chaos implies the possibility of accurate short-term predictions of precipitation.

Keywords

[1] Sivakumar B. 2000 Chaos theory in hydrology: Important issues and interpretations. Journal of Hydrology, 227, 1-20.
[2] Kocak K., Saylan L. & Sen O. 2000 Nonlinear time series prediction of O3 concentration in Istanbul. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1267-1271.
[3] Argyris J., Faust G. & Haase M. 1994 An Exploration of Chaos. Elsevier Science B.V.
[4] Solomatine D.P., Velickov S. & Wust J.C. 2001 Predicting water levels and currents in the North Sea using chaos theory and neural networks. Proc. 29th IAHR Congress, Beijing, China, pp. 1-11.
[5] Stehlik J. 2003 Deterministic chaos in runoff series. Czech Hydro Meteorological Institute, Department of Experimental Hydrology, Prague.
[6] Khan S., Ganguly A.R. & Saigal S. 2005 Detection and predictive modeling of chaos in finite hydrological time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 12, 41-53.
[7] Damle C. & Yalcin A. 2007 Flood prediction using time series data mining. Journal of Hydrology, 333, 305-316.
[8] Shang P., Na X. & Kamae S. 2009 Chaotic analysis of time series in the sediment transport phenomenon. Chaos, Solutions and Fractals, 41, 368-379.
[9] Wu J., Lu J. & Wang J. 2009 Application of chaos and fractal models to water quality time series prediction. Environmental Modelling and Software, 24, 632-636.
[10] Ghorbani M.A., Kisi O. & Alinezhad M. 2010 A probe into the chaotic nature of daily stream flow time series by correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov methods. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 4050-4057.
[11] Fattahi M.H., Talebbeydokhti N., Moradkhani H. & Nikooee E. 2013 Revealing the chaotic nature of river flow. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 37, 437-456.
[12] Tavakoli A.R. & Babazadeh H. 2015 Capability evaluation of time series and chaos theory in estimating reference crop evapotranspiration (Torbat-e-Heydarieh synoptic station, Khorasan Razavi). Iranian Journal of
Water Research, 9, 111-120. (In Persian)
[13] Hassanzadeh Y., Lotfollahi-Yaghin M.A., Shahverdi S., Farzin S. & Farzin N. 2013 De-noising and prediction of time series based on the wavelet algorithm and chaos theory (Case study: SPI drought monitoring index of Tabriz city). Iranian Water Resources Research, 8, 1-13.
(In Persian)
[14] Sang Y.F. 2013 A review on the applications of wavelet transform in hydrology time series analysis. Atmospheric Research, 122, 8-15.
[15] Anonymous, 2007 Report of water allocation in resources development projects. Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Iran.
 [16] Hense A. 1987 On the possible existence of a strange attractor for the southern oscillation. Beitrage zur Physik der Atmosphare, 60, 34-47.
[17] Rodriguez-Iturbe I., De Power F.B., Sharifi M.B. & Georgakakos K.P. 1989 Chaos in rainfall. Water Resources Research, 25, 1667-1675.
[18] Sivakumar B., Liong S.Y., Liaw C.Y. & Phoon K.K. 1999. Singapore rainfall behavior: Chaotic? International Journal of Hydrological Engineering, ASCE, 4, 38-48.
[19] Berndtsson  R., Jinno  K., Kawamura A., Olsson J. & Xu S. 1994 Dynamical systems theory applied to long-term temperature and precipitation time series. International Journal of Trends in Hydrology, 1, 291-297.
[20] Jayawardena A.W. & Lai F. 1994 Analysis and prediction of chaos in rainfall and stream flow time series. International Journal of Hydrology, 153, 23-52.
[21] Sivakumar B., Berndtsson R., Olsson J., Jinno K. & Kawamura A. 2000. Dynamics of monthly rainfall-runoff process at the Gota basin: A search for chaos. International Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4, 407-417.
[22] Sivakumar B. 2001 Rainfall dynamics at different temporal scales: A chaotic perspective. International Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5, 645-651.
[23] Gaume E., Sivakumar B., Kolasinski M. &
Hazoume L. 2006 Identification of chaos in rainfall temporal disaggregation. International Journal of Hydrology, 328, 56-64.
[24] Abarbanel H. 1996 Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[25] Holzfuss J. & Mayer-Kress G. 1986 An approach to error-estimation in the application of dimension algorithms. In: Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems, Mayer-Kress, G. (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, pp. 114-147.
[26] Islam M.N. & Sivakumar B. 2002 Characterization and prediction of runoff dynamics: A nonlinear dynamical view. International Journal of Advances in Water Resources, 25, 179-190.
[27] Frazier C. & Kockelman K. 2004 Chaos theory and transportation systems: An instructive example. Proc. of 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
[28] Grassberger P. & Procaccia I. 1983 Characterization of strange attractors. Physical Review Letters, 50, 346-349.
[29] Cao L. 2007 Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of scalar time series. Physica D, 110, 43-50.
[30] Strozzi L., Tenrreiro E., Noe C. & Rossi T. 2007 Application of non-linear time series analysis techniques to Nordic spot electricity market data. Liuc Papers, Series Tecnologia, 11, 1-5.
[31] Hilborn T. 2000 Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics. Oxford University Press.
[32] Akay M., Henry B., Lovell N. & Camacho F. 2012 Nonlinear Dynamics Time Series Analysis. Wiley Online Library.
[33] Banks F., Dragan V. & Jones A. 2003 Chaos, A Mathematical Introduction. Cambridge University Press
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 17, Issue 2
July and August 2017
Pages 213-223