Effect Of Slenderness Ratio On Nonlinear-Static/Cyclic Behavior Characteristics Of Shear Panels

Authors
1 Assistant professor/Golestan university
2 Islamic azad university of Bandar-abbas
Abstract
Thin-walled structures are widely used in different engineering applications. Bridge and building plate girders, box columns and girders, frame bracing systems, liquid and gas containment structures, shelters, offshore structures, ship structures, slabs, hot-rolled W-shape steel profiles, steel plate shear wall systems and many other naval and aeronautical structures are examples of engineering elements that according to their applications use plate of various thicknesses. The knowledge of the actual behavior of plates in such structures can be, of course, helpful in understanding the overall behavior of the structures. In general, plates in thin-walled structures may be under various types of loading, such as shear loading. Material yielding and geometrical buckling of plates are two independent phenomena which may well interact with each other in shear panels. Depending on the material properties, slenderness and aspect ratios, and boundary conditions of perfectly flat plates, yielding may occur before, after or at the same time as buckling. Buckling in slender plates is a local and sudden phenomenon followed by large out-of-plane displacements and loss of stiffness. Slender plates are capable of carrying considerable post-buckling additional loads due to stresses in the inclined tension fields. On the other hand, a plate with low slenderness ratio yields before buckles and thus, no post-buckling capacity is expected. In between, in plates with moderate slenderness ratios, material yielding and geometrical nonlinearity happen almost at the same time. In the present paper, the behavior characteristics of shear panels with simple or clamed boundary conditions and three different materials (carbon steel, stainless steel and aluminum) are studied for various plate slenderness ratios, using finite element method. Results of nonlinear static analyses of different shear panels show that slender plates, depending on the slenderness ratio, carry a relatively small shear load in the elastic stage until the occurrence of shear buckling, but their additional capacity in the post-buckling stage prior to yielding are significantly large. They reach their ultimate shear capacity slightly after yielding. That is, their post-yield capacity is not significant. Note that the ultimate shear strength of slender plates is considerably lower than their nominal shear yield strength. In plates with intermediate slenderness ratios, material yielding and buckling occur concurrently. They carry a relatively large shear load in the elastic stage before yielding/buckling. They have also some post-buckling/post-yield reserves before failure. The ultimate shear strength of moderate plates is somewhat lower than their nominal shear yield strength. In stocky plates, yielding precedes buckling. The shear capacity in the elastic stage before yielding is thus significant. The plates have some post-yield capacity and the ultimate load is coincident with the occurrence of plastic buckling (if happens). The ultimate shear strength of stocky plates is almost equal to their nominal shear yield strength. Moreover, results of quasi-static cyclic analyses of different shear panels show that the energy absorption capability, as expected, is very sensitive to the slenderness ratio of panels and with the decrease of the slenderness ratio (increase of thickness), the absorbed energy by the panels is substantially increased. For a specific slenderness ratio, steel shear panels exhibit higher energy absorption than panels with aluminum materials (although aluminum material has higher yield strength than that of carbon steel and stainless steel materials, here). This, of course, highlights the important role of the modulus of elasticity in the energy dissipation capability of shear panels. However, the material yield strength and panel boundary conditions do not seem to have important role in the amount of energy dissipated by the panels, compared to the material modulus of elasticity.

Keywords


[1]. Pellegrino C., Maiorana E., and Modena C. 2009 Linear and non-linear behaviour of steel plates with circular and rectangular holes under shear loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 47: 607-16.
[2]. Sabouri-Ghomi S., Ahouri E., Sajadi R., Alavi M., Roufegarinejad A., and Bradford M.A., 2012 Stiffness and strength degradation of steel shear walls having an arbitrarily-located opening, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 79: 91-100.
[3]. Hosseinzadeh S.A.A., and Tehranizadeh M., 2014 Behavioral characteristics of code designed steel plate shear wall systems, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 99: 72-84.
[4]. Hosseinzadeh S.A.A., and Tehranizadeh M., 2014 The wall–frame interaction effect in steel plate shear wall systems, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 98: 88-99.
[5]. Wagner H., 1931 Flat sheet metal girders with very thin webs, Part I General theories and assumptions, Technical Memo. No. 604, National Advistory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington.
[6]. Inoue T., 1996 Analysis of plastic buckling of steel plates in shear based on the Tresca yield criterion, Int J Solids Struct, 33(26): 3903-23.
[7]. Tugcu P., 1998 Effect of axial loading on plastic buckling of long strips under pure shear, Comput Struct, 66(2-3): 155-61.
[8]. Montgomery C.J., Medhekar M., Lubell A.S., Prion H.G.L., Ventura C.E., and Rezai M., 2000 Unstiffened steel plate shear wall performance under cyclic loading, Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(4):973.
[9]. Lubell A.S., Prion H.G.L., Ventura C.E., and Rezai M., 2000 Unstiffened steel plate shear wall performance under cyclic loading, Journal of structural Engineering, 453-60.
[10]. Alinia M.M., and Dastfan M., 2007 Cyclic behaviour, deformability and rigidity of stiffened steel shear panels, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63: 554-63.
[11]. Alinia M.M., Hosseinzadeh S.A.A., and Habashi H.R., 2007 Influence of central cracks on buckling and post- buckling behaviour of shear panels, Thin-Walled Structures, 45: 422-31.
[12]. Alinia M.M., Hosseinzadeh S.A.A., and Habashi H.R., 2008 Buckling and post-buckling strength of shear panels degraded by near border cracks, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64: 1483-94.
[13]. Alinia M.M., Hosseinzadeh S.A.A., and Habashi H.R., 2008 Numerical modelling for buckling analysis of cracked shear panels, Thin-Walled Structures, 45: 1058-67.
[14]. Alinia M.M., Erfani S., and Gheitasi A., 2009 Plastic shear buckling of unstiffened stocky plates, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65: 1631-43.
[15]. Alinia M.M., and Gheitasi A., 2010 Slenderness Classification of unstiffened metal plates under shear loading, Thin-Walled Structures, 48: 508-18.
[16]. AASHTO, 2005 3rd ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC.
[17]. Zirakian T., Zhang, J., 2015 Structural performance of unstiffened low yield point steel plate shear walls, Journal of Constructional steel research, 112: 40-53.
[18]. Chen Sh.J., Jhang Ch., 2011 Experimental study of low yield point steel plate shear wall under in-plane load, Journal of Constructional steel research, l 67: 977-85.
[19]. ATC-24. 1992 Guidelines Of Cyclic Seismic Testing On Components For Steel Structures,
 Redwood City, California, U.S.A.