Performance evaluation of Tabriz petrochemical wastewater treatment plant

Author
Abstract
Introduction: Petrochemical industry is one of the major industries playing significant role in the economy of Iran. In general, petrochemical effluents contain various contaminants including suspended solids, organic matters, oil and grease, metal salts, sulfide, ammonia, hydrocarbons, cyanides, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other toxic substances. In most of petrochemical complexes, wastewaters are treated by activated sludge process along with the oil/water separation systems as a pretreatment. Since the performance evaluation of wastewater treatment plant is required to assess the effluent quality, to meet higher treatment requirement and to know the feasibility of handling higher hydraulic and/or organic loadings, this study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a full-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant.
Materials and methods: Wastewater treatment system consists of a screening unit, an API, an equalization basin, coagulation and flocculation, DAF system, aeration tanks, primary and secondary clarifier and filtration. The treatment plant was designed to treat the wastewater generated from different units of petrochemical complex with reuse purposes of treated effluent. To evaluate the performance of the treatment plant, 12-h composite flow weighted samples were carried out in 4 days within 6 month and were analyzed for COD, BOD5, TDS, TSS, phenol, cyanide, oil, ammonia and TKN in accordance to standard methods. Microbial structure of activated sludge was also evaluated. Overall performance of the plant and the performance efficiency of each unit were calculated.
Results: According to the results, the actual average influent flow was significantly lower than the average design flow based on the long-term data and our measurements. This increases the hydraulic retention time (HRT) in all units in the WWTP. Based on the results, the values of COD, BOD5 and TSS in the influent and effluent were 1319±230, 967±491 and 227±174 mg/l and 73.6±19.6, 33.6±25.9 and 6.4±5.9 mg/l respectively. The ratio of BOD5/COD was calculated about 0.58 indicates a good potential for biodegradability of the wastewater. The results also revealed that 68.5% removal of COD and 81.9% removal of BOD5 have been occurred in preliminary and primary units while; these units are usually designed for the elimination of oil and suspended solids as well as the equalization of quantitative and qualitative parameters of the influent. At an organic loading of 0.48±0.15 kg/m3.d the removal efficiencies for COD and BOD5 in biological unit were calculated about 37 and 46% respectively. The mean value of MLSS within the biological reactor was 1463 mg/l. In addition, the mean plus standard deviation values of MLSS measured in returned activated sludge (RAS) were 2323 ± 1080 mg/l. According to the daily average concentrations of COD in the effluent of the WWTP, in some cases within the study period, the COD values were exceeded from national discharge standards. Microbial analysis showed that among the isolated bacterial strains, the genus belonging to Alcaligenes, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Moraxella as heterotrophic nitrifying bacteria was identified as predominant strains in biological unit.
Conclusion: Based on the results, in 64% of our measurements (135 days from 209 days of study period), the daily average effluent COD values were above national guidelines for surface water discharge (60 mg/l). In 3% of the time during the study period, the daily average values of COD in the effluent were more than 200 mg/l. The results also indicated that the average effluent concentration of oil was significantly higher than the expected design value.

Keywords


- مراجعReferences                                                 
[1] Botalova O., Schwarzbauer J., Frauenrath T. & Dsikowitzky L. 2009 Identification and chemical characterization of specific organic constituents of petrochemical effluents. Water Research, 43(15), 3797-3812.
[2] Chen C., Yu J., Yoza B. A., Li Q. X. & Wang G. 2015 A novel “wastes-treat-wastes” technology: Role and potential of spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst assisted ozonation of petrochemical wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 152, 58-65.
[3] Tobiszewski M., Tsakovski S., Simeonov V. & Namieśnik J. 2012 Chlorinated solvents in a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant: An assessment of their removal using self-organising maps. Chemosphere, 87(8), 962-968.
[4] Zhang H., He Y., Jiang T. & Yang F. 2011 Research on characteristics of aerobic granules treating petrochemical wastewater by acclimation and co-metabolism methods. Desalination, 279(1–3), 69-74.
[5] Behnami A., Shakerkhatibi M., Dehghanzadeh R., Zoroufchi Benis K., Derafshi S. & Fatehifar E. 2016 The implementation of data reconciliation for evaluating a full-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 22586-22595.
[6] Malamis S., Katsou E., Di Fabio S., Frison N., Cecchi F. & Fatone F. 2014 Treatment of petrochemical wastewater by employing membrane bioreactors: a case study of effluents discharged to a sensitive water recipient. Desalination and Water Treatment, 53(12), 3397- 3406.
[7] Mao I. F., Chen M. L., Lan C. F., Chang Y. P. & Chang S. C. 1994 Mutagenicity determination of the wastewater emitted from petrochemical industry in Taiwan. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 76(3-4), 459-466.
[8] Takht Ravanchi M., Kaghazchi T. & Kargari A. 2009 Application of membrane separation processes in petrochemical industry: a review. Desalination, 235(1–3), 199-244.
[9] Yeruva D. K., Jukuri S., Velvizhi G., Naresh Kumar A., Swamy Y. V. & Venkata Mohan S. 2015 Integrating sequencing batch reactor with bio-electrochemical treatment for augmenting remediation efficiency of complex petrochemical wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 188, 33-42.
[10] Liu S., Ma Q., Wang B., Wang J. & Zhang Y. 2014 Advanced treatment of refractory organic pollutants in petrochemical industrial wastewater by bioactive enhanced ponds and wetland system. Ecotoxicology, 23(4), 689-98.
[11] Shokrollahzadeh S., Azizmohseni F., Golmohammad F., Shokouhi H. & Khademhaghighat F. 2008 Biodegradation potential and bacterial diversity of a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant in Iran. Bioresource Technology, 99(14), 6127-6133.
[12] Cho S. H., Lee H. J. & Moon S. H. 2008 Integrated electroenzymatic and electrochemical treatment of petrochemical wastewater using a pilot scale membraneless system. Process Biochemistry, 43(12), 1371-1376.
[13] Zhao L. J., Ma F. & Guo J. B. 2009 Applicability of anoxic-oxic process in treating petrochemical wastewater. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 10(1), 133-141.
[14] Qin J. J., Oo M. H., Tao G., & Kekre K. A. 2007 Feasibility study on petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse using submerged MBR. Journal of Membrane Science, 293(1–2), 161-166.
[15] Zhao L. J., Ma F., Guo J. B. & Zhao Q. L. 2007 Petrochemical wastewater treatment with a pilot-scale bioaugmented biological treatment system. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 8(11), 1831-1838.
[16] Kumar K. S., Kumar P. S. & Babu M. R. 2010 Performance evaluation of Waste water treatment plant. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(12), 7785-7796.
[17] Akbari Z., Shakerkhatibi M., Mosaferi M., Derafshi S., Fatehifar E., Chavoshbashi M. M., & Behnami A. 2016 Evaluation of operating performance of ABS wastewater treatment system. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 16(2), 31-40. (In Persian).
[18] Shakerkhatibi M., Mosaferi M., Zorufchi Benis K., & Akbari Z. 2016 Performance evaluation of a full-scale ABS resin manufacturing wastewater treatment plant: a case study in Tabriz Petrochemical Complex. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 3(3), 151–158.
[19] Sponza D. T. & Gök O. 2010 Effect of rhamnolipid on the aerobic removal of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and COD components from petrochemical wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 101(3), 914-924.
[20] Puig S., Van Loosdrecht M. C. M., Colprim J. & Meijer S. C. F. 2008 Data evaluation of full-scale wastewater treatment plants by mass balance. Water Research, 42(18), 4645-4655.
[21] Colmenarejo M. F., Rubio A., Sánchez E., Vicente J., García M. G. & Borja R. 2006 Evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants with different technologies at Las Rozas, Madrid (Spain). Journal of Environmental Management, 81(4), 399-404.
[22] Haydar S., Hussain G., Nadeem O., Haider H., Bari A. J. & Hayee A. 2014 Performance evaluation of anaerobic-aerobic treatment for the wastewater of potato processing industry: A case study of a local chips factory. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(1), 27-37.
[23] Dias D. F. C., Possmoser-Nascimento T. E., Rodrigues V. A. J. & Von Sperling M. 2014 Overall performance evaluation of shallow maturation ponds in series treating UASB reactor effluent: Ten years of intensive monitoring of a system in Brazil. Ecological Engineering, 71, 206-214.
[24] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005 21st Ed., American Public Health Association/American Water Works Assossiation/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA.
[25] Staley J. T., Boone D. R., Brenner D. J., Vos P. D., Garrity G. M., Goodfellow M., Krieg N. R., Rainey F. A. & Schleifer K. H. 2005 Bergey's manual of systematic  bacteriology, 2nd Ed., Springer Science and Business Media.
[26] Al-Mutairi N. Z., Al-Sharifi F. A. & Al-Shammari S. B. 2008 Evaluation study of a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant including contact-assisted activated sludge and DAF. Desalination, 225(1–3), 167-175.
[27] Tchobanoglous G., Burton F. L. & Stensel H. D. 2003 Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th ed., Metcalf & Eddy Inc., McGraw-Hill, New York.
[28] Chaillan F., Le Flèche A., Bury E., Phantavong Y. H., Grimont P., Saliot A. & Oudot J. 2004 Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms. Research in Microbiology, 155(7), 587-595.
[29] Danana G. H., Parekh L. J. & Ramakrishnan C. V. 1985 Bacterial profile of petrochemical industry effluents. Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological, 39(1), 27-37.
[30] Suzuki T., Yamaguchi T. & Ishida M. 1998 Immobilization of Prototheca zopfü in calcium-alginate beads for the degradation of hydrocarbons. Process Biochemistry, 33(5), 541-546.
[31] Akbari Z., Shakerkhatibi M., Mosaferi M., Asl Rahnema Akbari N., Shiri Z., & Farshchian M. R. 2016 Isolation and identification of dominant microorganisms in activated sludge of ABS effluent treatment plant and evaluation of their potential for acrylonitrile biodegradation. The Journal of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, 27(5), 375-383. (In Persian).