Seismic performance assessment of concrete beam–column connection strengthened Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polimer

Author
university of birjand
Abstract
In the design process of a moment resisting frame (MRF), the principle of weak–beam and strong–column should been considered because the plastic hinge occurs in the beams. This mechanism is caused that the frame has capable of dissipating significant energy and remain stable in the inelastic region. Hence, the stability is defined as the ability of the frame to maintain its elastic level of resistance throughout the entire inelastic range of response. Using this principle, plastic hinges can be develop in the beams adjacent to the connections and usually very close to the column face. This mechanism allow cracks caused by the plastic hinging. The cracks can also propagate into the connection core region, and initiate a brittle failure mechanism. Furthermore, the mechanism has been not established in many existing MRFs designed based on the previous codes. Hence, the methods have been proposed and developed in order to relocate the plastic hinge away from the column face. Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) has been used as a strengthening solution of beam–column connections and successfully reported for retrofitting existing structures. In fact, the use of a web–bonded FRP retrofitting system can control the mechanism of plastic hing and provide the strong–column weak–beam concept. Due to the many advantages, such as high strength, low weight, endurance and convenience, Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Polimers (CFRPs) have been widely used in strengthening concrete structures.
However, the strength and stiffness of CFRP are severely reduced at elevated temperatures, which will affect the strengthening effect seriously.
In this study, six schemes of strengthened concrete beam–column connection using CFRP are proposed and the seismic performance of the strengthened connection is investigated. In order to achieve this purpose, seven scaled–down RC exterior joint of a typical ordinary MRF are chosen and modeling this strengthened connection is implemented in the general finite element program, ABAQUS software. In the finite element model of strengthened concrete beam–column connection, the concrete is modeled using the damaged plastic model. The sheets of CFRP are also considered as the elastic and orthotropic model. These schemes of strengthened concrete beam–column connection are tested under moderately monotonic/cyclic loads. In order to verify the finite element model of the connection, the analysis results of this model is compared with the experimental investigation on the external beam–column connection repaired strengthened using CFRP. The results demonstrates the verification of the finite element model. The selection of the best scheme of strengthened concrete beam–column connection using CFRP is based on the improvement of the seismic performance of connection such as the load–carrying capacity, the energy absorption, the initial stiffness and changing failure mechanism of connection. The nonlinear results show that the proper layout of CFRP sheets can increase the load–carrying capacity, the energy absorption and the initial stiffness of connections. Furthermore, the proposed schemes of strengthened concrete beam–column connection are caused that the failure is relocated from the column face and located in beam. Therefore, the proposed best scheme of strengthened concrete beam–column connection using CFRP can be recommended and utilized in the practical projects of concrete structures.

Keywords


- مراجع                                   References
 [1] ] Hadiqa SA, Moheini; “Assessment of behavior factor and performance level of RC frames retrofitted by polymer CFRP”; International Conference of lightweight and earthquake, ACECR University of Kerman, (1389). (In Persian)
[2] Purba B, Mufti A; “Investigation of the behavior of circular concrete columns reinforced with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) jackets”; Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 26 (1999) 590-596.
[3] Pulido C, Saiidi S, Sanders D, Itani A; “Experimental validation and analysis of a CFRP retrofit of two-column bent”; In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure, San Francesco, CA, USA, 10–12 June 2002.
[4] Taghvai Abrishami M; “Seismic of reinforced concrete structures using composite”; Master thesis, University of Yazd, (1385). (In Persian)
 [5] Kin T, Li M; “Mechanical performance of composite-strengthened concrete structures”; Composites: Part B 32 (2001) 21–31.               
[6] Se W, Yousok K, Hyo S; “Multi-objective seismic retrofit method for using FRP jackets in shear-critical reinforced concrete frames”; Composites: Part B 56 (2014) 207–216.
[7] Mosallam A; “Strength and ductility of reinforced concrete moment frame connections strengthened with quasi-isotropic laminates”; Composites: Part B 31)2000) 481–497.  
[8] Parvin A, Wu S; “Ply angle effect on fiber composite wrapped reinforced concrete beam-column connections under combined axial and cyclic loads”; Composite Structures 82 (2008) 532–538.
[9] Parvin A, Granata P; “Investigation on the effects of fiber composites at concrete joints”; Engineering Structures 27 (2000) 499-509.
[10] Li j, Samali B, Ye L, Bakoss S; “Behavior of concrete beam–column connections reinforced with hybrid FRP sheet”; Composite Structures 57 (2002) 357–365.
[11] Balsamo A, Colombo A, Man fredi G, Negro P, Prota A; “Seismic behavior of a full-scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates”, Engineering Structures 27 (2005) 769–780.
[12] Mahini S, and Ronagh H.R. “Estimation of the Ductility of Web-Bonded FRP Beams for Assessment of Strengthened RC Exterior Joints”. Composites Engineering  (2006) 581-595.
[13] Mahini, S.S. and Ronagh H.R; “Web-bonded FRPs for relocation of plastic hinges away from the column face in exterior RC joints”; Composite Structures 93 (2011) 2460-2472.
[14] Hatem Hassan A; “Stud reinforcement in beam-column joints under seismic loads”; Department Of Civil Engineering Calgary, Alberta, 2011.
[15] ABAQUS 6.12 Analysis User’s Manual Volume II.