Effects of return mixed liquor recycling ratio on A2/O process

Authors
M. raji
S. A. Mirbagheri
Professor /civil and environmental engineering K.N.Toosi University of technology
Abstract
Discharging wastewater effluent to surface water or groundwater is so dangerous for environment, while it includes nutrient. As the phosphorus and nitrogen combinations in the aquatic environments have harmful impacts (mainly the poisonousness of ammonia, overgrowth of aquatic plants, groundwater pollute to nitrate and diseases caused by drinking the polluted water, and also eutrophication, resulting in frequent outbreaks of algal blooms and threatening the reliable supply of drinking water resources), some limitations were imposed on the consistency of these combinations in the entry waste. So nowadays removal of these combinations must be considered in designing of the treatment plants and also systems designed for treating the municipal wastewater must be able to remove nitrogen and phosphorus combinations to reach the standard limit. Therefore, in order to good performance of the aerobic-anaerobic A2/O method, it is proposed in this research and a study in advanced treatment of municipal wastewater using the A2/O method to remove nitrogen and phosphorus in the pilot scale in Ekbatan WWTP has been done.
In this research, firstly the principals of biological removal of nitrogen and phosphorus, and secondly the basis of designing biological treatment plants have been investigated. Then for laboratorial studies, an A2/O pilot has been made. This pilot consists of anaerobic, anoxic and aeration tanks and also sedimentation tank. The volume of these 4 tanks are 40, 60, 170 and 120 L, respectively. In order to simulate the real condition, this pilot has been set up in Ekbatan plant and the experiments were done to observe the effect of hydraulic residence time on nitrate, ammonia and phosphorus removal and also the effect of oxic mixed liquor recycling ratio on nitrate removal has been conducted. In order to observe the nitrate, ammonia and phosphorus removal process efficiency, the experiments were done in a period of three months and in 5 aeration hydraulic residence times, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours. In these experiments, the returned sludge was 25% and the oxic mixed liquor recycling ratio was 75%. After determining the best hydraulic residence time, experiments continued in 5 different oxic mixed liquor recycling ratios, 75%,150%, 225%, 300% and 375%.
It was concluded that at aeration hydraulic residence time of 8 hours, 96% COD , 95% ammonia and 79% phosphorus (effluent: 9 mg/L COD, 0.87 mg/L ammonia, 2.1 mg/L phosphorus, 18.7 mg/L nitrate) removal were achieved and that was the best HRT. Furthermore, according to the mixed liquor recycling ratio experiments, when the oxic mixed liquor recycling ratio was about 180 - 200%, optimum removing nitrate has been occurred. Although the mixed liquor recycling ratio of 225 - 275% resulted better efficiency for nitrate removal, it is not proposed, because effluent limitations in Iran for the nitrate is up to 10 mg/l which it is resulted in the mixed liquor recycling ratio of 180 -200%, and the other reason is that, with increasing the oxic mixed liquor recycling ratio, energy costs will increase, too.

Keywords

[1]                Bestawy, E., Hussein, H., Baghdadi, H. &  El-saka, M.F. 2005 Comparison between biological and chemical treatment of wastewater containing nitrogen and phosphorus. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(5),195-203.
[2]                 Wang, C., Yu, X., Lv, H. & Yang, J. 2013 Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater by the green alga chlorella sp.  Journal of Environmental Biology, 34, 421-425.
[3]                Amanollah, Jr. & Stewart, B. A. 2013 Dry Matter Partitioning, Growth Analysis and Water Use Efficiency Response of Oats (Avena sativa L.) to Excessive Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application. J. Agr. Sci. Tech, 15, 479-489.
[4]                Fan, J., Tao, T., Zhang, J. & You, G.L. 2009 Performance evaluation of a modified A2/O process treating low strength wastewater. Desalination, 249 (2), 822–827.
[5]                Van Nieuwenhuijzen, A.F.V., Bentem, A.G.N.V., Buunnen, A., Reitsma, B.A. & Uijterlinde, C.A. 2008 The limits and ultimate possibilities of technology of the activated sludge process. Water Science and Technology, 58 (8), 1671–1677.
[6]                Mulkerrins D., Jordan C., McMahon S. & Colleran E. 2000 Evaluation of the parameters affecting nitrogen and phosphorus removal in anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A/A/O) biological nutrient removal systems. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 75, 261–268.
[7]                 Onnerth TB., Nielsen MK. & Stanmer C. 1996 Advanced computer control based on real and software sensors. Water Sci Technol, 33, 237–245
[8]                Rittmann BE. & McCarty PL. 2001 Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Application. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 539–549.
[9]                Shoji T., Satoh H. & Mino T. 2003 Quantitative estimation of the role of denitrifying phosphate accumulating organisms in nutrient removal. Water Sci Technol,  47, 23–29 .
[10]            Wang, X.L., Peng, Y.Z., Wang, S.Y., Fan, J. & Cao, X.M. 2006 Influent of wastewater composition on nitrogen and phosphorus removal and process control in A2O process. Bioprocess Bio system Engineering, 28, 397–404.
[11]            Peng, Y.Z., Wang, X.L., Wu, W., Li, J. & Fan, J. 2006 Optimisation of anaerobic/anoxic/oxic process to improve performance and reduce operating costs. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 81, 1391–1397.
[12]              Sin, G,. Niville, K,. Bachis, G,. Jiang, T,. Nopens, I,. Van, S, & Peter, A,  2008 Nitrite effect on the phosphorus uptake activity of phosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) in pilot-scale SBR and MBR reactors. WATER SA, 34(2), 249-260.
[13]              Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005 21th edn, American Public Health Association/ American Water Works Association/ Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA.
[14]             Module 18: The Activated Sludge Process 2013 Part IV, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection,.
[15]              Abualhail, S., Mohammed, R.N. & Xiwu, L., 2013 Integrated real-time control strategy in multi-tank A2O process for biological nutrient removal treating real domestic wastewater. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 301-400.
[16]             Barker, P.S. & Dold, P.L. 1996 Denitrification behavior in biological excess phosphorus removal activated sludge system. Water Research, 30 (4), 769–780.
[17]             Richard I.sedlak, 1991 Phosphorus And Nitrogen Removal From Municipal Wastewater: Principles and Practice 2nd edn, Lewis Book Company.
[18]             Misc, Kang, S.J.,Bio-P 2010 Bio-P Removal- Principles and examples in MI and elsewhere. on the URL http://www.mi-wea.org.

 
 
Modares Civil Engineering journal
Volume 17, Issue 3
September and October 2017
Pages 227-234