Processing of Structural Responses via Wavelet Transform for Detecting Damages under Earthquake Excitation

Abstract
Structural damage identification can be considered as the main step in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). We can find many different methods which use structural dynamic responses for damage prognosis. Although some of them are concentrated on solving an inverse problem for damage identification, others suggest a direct procedure for defect detection. Despite the good performance of these methods in damage identification, researchers are attempting to find efficient and simple methods for damage identification with high level of accuracy. This paper presents a reference-free method for structural damage identification under earthquake excitation. Damages are defined as some changes in the special instants during an earthquake occurrence and structural time history responses are used as an input signal for discrete wavelet analysis. Finally the “detail coefficients” are inspected for determining the damage characteristics, such as the appearance, the time sequence, and the location of damage(s). Although the peak values in the detail coefficients can show the existence and time sequence of damage, for determining damage location we should inspect these peaks for finding the maximum value. As a result, the associated element with a signal which has maximum peak, can be considered as the damaged element. The applicability of the presented method is demonstrated by studying three numerical examples. First example is devoted for damage identification in a four-story shear frame. It is assumed that we have equipped all of the stories by sensors for recording structural responses. Three different damage scenarios with single and multiple damage cases under two samples of earthquake records, namely El-Centro (1940), and Northridge (1994) earthquakes, are studied. In addition, we study the effect of using different wavelet mother functions and different input signals, such as displacement and velocity responses. All of the obtained results emphasize the applicability of the presented method in damage identification. In second example, we consider a concrete simple beam with ten elements by simulating two different damage scenarios. In this case, we inspect the applicability of the method by considering only the transitional degrees of freedom (DOF) as the equipped DOFs by sensors. This can be interpreted as using limited number of sensors. In addition we use the displacement time histories for damage identification. For having a clear strategy in damage localization, we propose two rules for judging about elements’ health which are based on seeking maximum values of the wavelet coefficients in the damaged instants. Obtained results show the good performance of the presented method in finding time sequence of damage occurrence and damage location. In the third example, we investigate the applicability of the presented method in the presence of complex models of damages by defining bilinear stiffness reduction. In this case, although damage can cause some reduction in the effective stiffness of damaged structure, this reduction is different in positive and negative displacements. Two different damage scenarios are simulated on a single DOF structure under different excitations, namely earthquake excitations and generated White Noise excitation. Obtained results reveal the robustness of the presented method in damage prognosis in the presence of complex damage models.

Keywords


[1] Doebling S. W., Farrar C. L. & Prime M. B. 1998 Summery review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30, 91-105.
[2] Chou J. H. & Ghaboussi J. 2001 Genetic algorithm in stuctural damage detection. Computers and Structures, 79(14), 1335-1353.
[3] Perera R., Fang S. E. & Huerta C. 2009 Structural crack detection without updated baseline model by single and multiobjective optimization. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 23(3), 752-768.
[4] Yang Q. W. & Liu J. K. 2009 Damage identification by the eigenparameter decomposition of structural flexibility change. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 78(4), 444-459.
[5] Ghodrati Amiri G., Seyed Razzaghi S. A. & Bagheri A. 2011 Damage detection in plates based on pattern search and genetic algorithms. Smart Structures and Systems, 7(2), 117-132.
[6] Saada M. M., Arafa M. H. & Nassef A. O. 2013 Finite element model updating approach to damage identification in beams using particle swarm optimization. Engineering Optimization, 45(6), 677-696.
[7] Tabrizian Z., Ghodrati Amiri G. & Hosseinzali Beigy M. 2014 Charged system search algorithm utilized for structural damage detection. Shock and Vibration, 2014: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sv/2014/194753/.
[8] Garstecki A., Knitter-Piatkowska A., Pozorski Z. & Ziopaja K. 2004 Damage detection using parameter dependent dynamic experimentsand wavelet transformation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 10(3), 191-197.
[9] Hera A. & Hou Z. 2004 Application of wavelet approach for ASCE structural health monitoring Benchmark Studies. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 130(1), 96-104.
[10] Loutridis S., Douka E. & Trochidis A. 2004 Crack identification in double-cracked beams using wavelet analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 277(4-5), 1025-1039.
[11] Ziopaja K., Pozorski Z. & Garstecki A. 2011 Damage detection using thermal experiments and wavelet transformation. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 19(1), 127-153.
[12] Newland D. E. 1993 An introduction to random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis. Longman, New York.
[13] Melhem H. & Kim H. 2003 Damage detection in concrete by Fourier and Wavelet analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 129(5), 571-577.
[14] Ovanesova A. V. & Sua´rez L. E. 2004 Applications of wavelet transforms to damage detection in frame structures. Engineering Structures, 26(1), 39-49.
[15] Ghodrati Amiri G., Bagheri A., Seyed Razzaghi S. A. & Asadi A. 2010 Structural damage detection in plates using wavelet transform. In: Challenges, Opportunities and Solutions in Structural Engineering and Construction, N. Ghafoori (ed.), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, pp. 415-419.
 
[16] Bagheri A. & Kourehli S. S. 2013 Damage detection of structures under earthquake excitation using discrete wavelet analysis. Asian Journal of civil engineering (BHRC), 14(2), 289-304.
[17] Ghodrati Amiri G., Jalalinia M., Zare Hosseinzadeh A. & Nasrollahi A. 2015 Multiple crack identification in Euler beams by means of B-spline wavelet. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 85(4), 503-515.
[18] Benedetto J. J. & Frazier M. W. 1994 WAVELETS: mathematics and application. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
[19] Mertins A. 1999 Signal analysis: wavelets, filter banks, time-frequency transforms and applications. Wiley, New Jersey.
[20] Li H., Deng X. & Dai H. 2007 Structural damage detection using the combination method of EMD and wavelet analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1), 289-306.
[21] Park S. K., Park H. W., Shin S. & Lee H. S. 2008 Detection of abrupt structural damage induced by an earthquake using a moving time window technique. Computers and Structures, 86(11-12), 1253-1265.