The role of Sulphur Polymer and Crumb Rubber additives in resistance against stripping of asphalt mixes

Authors
UNIVERCITY
Abstract
Premature failures are experienced in road pavements. Among the various failure modes, moisture damage is probably the most occurring distress in asphalt pavements. In fact, the continuous presence of water in asphalt layers weakens the bond between aggregate particles and bitumen, ending to stripping of mixes. With this regard, several parameters affect water damages to asphalt layers. Among these, aggregates type and source, bitumen type and grade, mixture design, construction practice, traffic volume, environment and the additive properties could be named as the most affecting parameters. In order to prevent stripping, one of the most effective methods is to use anti-stripping additives. Among the various additives, sulphur which is a byproduct of petroleum gas production industries, has been known to increase stiffness of bituminous mixes appreciably, provided that it is added properly and at right amounts. However, due to environmental drawbacks of this additive (i.e. emission of disturbing gases) and the too much stiffening effects that imparts to mixes, sulphur alone was banned to be used in road pavements for several decades. In the recent years, combined additives, consisting of sulphur and polymers have been produced and applied into asphalt mixes. These additives have shown to have less adverse environmental effects (i.e. reduced emission of gases such as ). The effects of these additive types is so that their sulphur component provides stiffness to mixes and their polymer portion imparts some flexibility to mixes and increase the adhesion properties of the mix binders. “ASTM D8” Standard Testing Method. In this research a locally produced sulphur polymer additive, named ‘Googas’, was used and applied in a continuously graded asphalt mix. This new product had lower emissions of gas, compared with the conventional sulphur mixes. In addition, it provided enhanced properties to mixes, compared with previously made sulphur alone containing mixes. In order to reduce the stiffness of mixes and provide these with more flexibility, CRM (Crumb Rubber Modifier) modified binders were used as the replacement of conventional penetration grade binder of mixes. CRM binders were prepared containing different amounts of crumb rubber. The preparation was carried out in the laboratory using a high shear rate mixer upon following The results showed that increased amounts of Googas sulphur polymer although resulted in increased compression strength, reduced the moisture resistance of mixes substantially. In fact, it was seen that when asphalt mixes were cooled to ambient temperatures, the sulphur tended to change from liquid into solid state, contributing little to bitumen adhesiveness. In contrast, mixes containing CRM binders alone, showed increased tensile properties, as indicated by increased ITS testing results. With analyzing the laboratory results, optimum amounts of the above two additives were determined. In fact, increased amounts of CRM resulted in increased tensile resistance of mixes (i.e. showing a gradual increasing trend). This was up to CRM’s of 18% to 20%. Further increases resulted in lower tensile strengths. Hence, optimized mixes were designed containing both CRM and sulphur polymer additives.

Keywords


[1] Yildirim. Y., “Polymer modified asphalt binders”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 21, 2007, pp 66-72.
[2] Xiao. F, Amirkhanian S., “Laboratory investigation of moisture damage in Rubberized Asphalt Mixtures Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement”, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol 21, 2007, pp. 958-964.
[3] Cagri. G. and Burak S., “Polymer modified bitumen and hydrated lime”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 23, 2009, pp. 2227-2236.
[4] Mehrara. A. and Khodaii A., “A review of state of the art on stripping phenomenon in asphalt concrete”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 38, 2013, pp. 423-442.
[5] Hicks. R.G., “Asphalt rubber design and construction guidelines”, Desing Guideline, Department of Civil Engineering Oregon State University, Vol 1, 2002.
[6] Lo Presti. D., “Recycled Tyre Rubber Modified Bitumen for road asphalt mixtures: A literature review”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 49, 2013, PP. 863–881.
[7] Hussain. U. Bahia and Davies. R., “Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) on
Performance-Related Properties of Asphalt Binders”, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol 63, 1994, PP. 414-438.
[8] Amirkhanian. S, and Shen j., “The influence of crumb rubber modifier (CRM) microstructures on the high temperature properties of CRM binders”, The International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol 6, 2005, PP. 265-271.
[9] Lee. S, Akisetty K, and Amirkhanian N., “The effect of crumb rubber modifier (CRM) on the performance properties of rubberized binders in HMA pavements”., Construction and Building Materials, Vol 22, 2008, PP. 1368-1376.
[10] Timm, D.H., M.M. Robbins, J.R. Willis, N. Tran and A.J. Taylor. “Evaluation of Mixture Performance and Structural Capacity of Pavements Using Shell Thiopave: Phase II –Construction, Laboratory Evaluation, and Full-Scale Testing of Thiopave Test Sections –One Year Report”. Report 11-03, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. USA, 2011.
[11] Filippis. P.D., "Sulphur – Extended Asphalt, Reaction Kinetics of H2S Evolution", Fuel,. Vol 77, 1998, PP. 459–463.
[12] Strickland. D., J.Colange,.Martin, M and Deme, I., “performance properties of sulfur extended asphalt mixtures with modified Sulfur Pellets”, International Symposium on Asphalt Pavements and Environment, ISAP, Zurich, 2008.
[13] Stuart K., “Performance evaluation of sulfur-extended Asphalt Pavements – Laboratory Evaluation”,. FHWA-RD-90-110, U.S. Department of Transportation (FHWA), Washington, DC, USA, 1990.
[14] Thodesen. C, Shatanawi. K, Amirkhanian. S., “Effect of crumb rubber characteristics on crumb rubber modified (CRM) binder viscosity”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 23, 2009, PP. 295-303.
[15] Presti, D., “Recycled Tyre Rubber Modified Bitumens for road asphalt mixtures”. Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol 49, 2013, PP. 863-881.
[16] Xiao, F, Amirkhanian. S, Shen. J and Putman. B., “Influences of Crumb Rubber Size and Type on Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Mixtures”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 23, 2009, PP. 1028-1034.
[17] Shen. J., Amirkhanian. S, Xiao. F and Tang. B., “Influence of surface area and size of crumb rubber on high temperature properties of crumb rubber modified binders”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 23, 2009, PP. 304-310.
[18] Kandhal P. “Evaluation of sulfur extended asphalt binders in bituminous paving mixtures”. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technology, Vol 51, 2012, PP. 189-222.
[19] Khodaii. A, Kazemi Tehrani. H, and Haghshenas. H.F,. “Hydrated lime effect on moisture susceptibility of warm mix asphalt”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 36, 2012, PP.165–170.