Evaluation of deflections in a braced excavation via plastic and consolidation analyses

Author
Abstract
Behavior of braced excavation in a cohesive-frictional soil has been evaluated by present paper. Two groups distinct analyses based on plastic calculations and consolidation calculations were implemented by considering time intervals of staged excavation. In order to investigation of time effect and pore water pressure impact on the staged excavation phases, numerical modeling has been conducted by help of consolidation and plastic analyses. In major of former analysis and before present study numerical analyses of staged excavation procedure have selected without considering the effect of time and in form of plastic analyses, while pore water pressures were also ignored. In this, paper thereto the time effect other effects such as length of time interval, kind of analysis depending on drainage conditions, constitutive modeling for soil and location of ground water table were considered. Two dimensional finite element analyses in PLAXIS 2D software are the basis of the numerical calculations of present study. Excavation bracing selected as a kind of concrete facing wall and grouted soil nailing. The results of this research show that the values of excavation wall lateral displacement and soil heave in bottom of the excavation in consolidation analysis by considering time effect in comparison with plastic analysis often reduced approximately 20%. It seems that effect of time and staged excavation just with implementation of numerical deflection analysis depending on the time such as consolidation analysis with creep models can be evaluated and these conditions in plastic numerical analysis with staged excavation without creep (time-depended) models is meaningless. Soft soil creep model (i.e. SSC model) for considering time effect in plastic and consolidation analyses has been used by authors. The results of present paper show that neither consideration of analyses that consider time interval nor analysis such as consolidation analysis that considers time are not adequate, but soil constitutive model that defines the material behavior must be contains time and also in their mathematic equations structure parameters such as time, strain rate and stress rate that vary with time must be taken into account. Present paper analyses show that consolidation analysis by considering time effect obtain less wall deflections by comparison with plastic analyses. However, from present study outcomes can conclude that the plastic analyses also by considering constitutive model that contain time can take into account time effects in stress-strain calculations. On the other hand, responses of plastic analyses by comparison with consolidation analyses always are preservative and show more values. Therefore, in structural designing of bracing of an excavation, reliance on results obtained from plastic analysis is preservative and real values of time-dependent deflections of wall and bottom of excavation via consolidation analyses are obtainable. This paper has recommended that both plastic and consolidation analyses for designing of braced cut were considered by engineers and optimum system between those according to the economically advantages and disadvantages be selected. Because, occasionally reliance on plastic preservative analyses lead to imposition of high values of design and construction costs on a certain project that is revealed by implementation of consolidation analyses that those are not necessary. At the end of the paper, verifications and comparisons are related to the topic of present study have been carried out by authors and the obtained results have been compared with together and then are investigated with the obtained results by present study.

Keywords


-[1] Briaud JL, Lim Y (1997) Soil nailed wall under piled bridge abutment: simulation and guidelines. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(11):1043-1050.
[2] Cheuk CY, Ng CWW, Sun HW (2005) Numerical experiments of soil nails in loose fill slopes subjected to rainfall infiltration effects. J Comput Geotech 32(4):290-303.
[3] Fan CC, Luo JH (2008) Numerical study on the optimum layout of soil nailed slopes. J Comput Geotech 35(4):585- 599.
[4] FHWA (2003) Geotechnical engineering circular No 7- soil nail walls. Report FHWA0-IF-03-017. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC .
[5] Juran I, Baudrand G, Farrag K, Elias V (1990) Kinematical limit analysis for design of soil-nailed structures. J Geotech Eng 116(1):54-72.
[6] Liew SS, Khoo CM (2006) Soil nail stabilization for a 14.5 m Deep excavation at uncontrolled fill ground. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[7] Ng CWW, Lee GTK (2002) A three-dimensional parametric study of the use of soil nails for stabilizing tunnel faces. Comput Geotech 29(8):673-697.
[8] Schlosser F (1991) Discussion-the multi-criteria theory in soil nailing. Ground Eng, November, pp 30-33.
[9] Sivakumar Babu GL, Murthy BRS, Srinivas A (2002) Analysis of construction factors influencing the behavior of soil nailed earth retaining walls. Ground Improv 6(3):137-143.
[10] Smith IM, Su N (1997) Three dimensional finite element analysis of nailed soil wall curved in plan. Int J Numeric Analytic Meth Geomech 21(9):583-597.
[11] Zhang M, Song E, Chen Z (1999) Ground movement analysis of soil nailing construction by three-dimensional (3-D) finite element modeling (FEM). Comput Geotech 25(4): 191-204.
[12] Ou CY (2006) Deep excavation: Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
[13] Kempfert H, Gebreselassie B (2006) Excavations and Foundations in Soft Soils. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
[14] Peck RB (1969) Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. In:Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering. Mexico City, State of the Art Volume, pp.225-290.
[15] Xu ZH, Wang WD, Wang JH, Shen SL (2005). Performance of deep excavation retaining wall in Shanghai soft deposit. Lowland Technol Int; 7:31-43.
[16] Osman AS, Bolton MD (2006) Ground movement predictions for braced excavations in undrained clay.  J Geotech Geoenviron Eng; 132(4):465-77.
[17] Kung GTC, Ou CY, Juang CH (2009) Modeling small-strain behavior of Taipei clays for finite element analysis of braced excavations. J Comput Geotech; 36(1):304-19.
[18] Mana AI, Clough GW (1981) Prediction of movement for braced cuts in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng; 107(6):759-77.
[19] Wong KS, Broms BB (1989) Lateral wall deflections of braced excavation in clay. J Geotech Eng; 115(6):853-70.
[20] Hashash YMA, Whittle AJ (1996) Ground movement prediction for deep excavations in soft clay. J Geotech Eng; 122(6):474-86.
[21] Kung GTC, Juang CH, Hsiao ECL, Hashash YMA (2007) Simplified model for wall deflection and ground-surface settlement caused by braced excavation in clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng; 133(6):731-47.
[22] Jen LC (1998) The design and performance of deep excavation in clay. Ph.D thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US.
[23] Lam SSY (2010) Ground movements due to excavation in clay: physical and analytical models. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge, UK.
[24] Xuan F (2009) Behavior of diaphragm walls in clays and reliability analysis. M. Eng. Thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
[25] Hsieh PG, Ou CY (1998) Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 35(6), 1004-1017.
[26] Ou CY, Hsieh PG, Chiou DC (1993) Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 30, 758-767.
[27] Ou CY, Hsieh PG (2011) A simplified method for predicting ground settlement profiles induced by excavation in soft clay. Computers and Geotechnics 38(12), 987-997.
[28] Singh VP, Babu GLS (2010) 2D Numerical Simulations of Soil Nail Walls. J  Geotech Geol Eng, 28:299-309.
[29] Likitlersuanga S, Surarak C, Wanatowskic D, Oh E, Balasubramaniamd A (2013) Finite element analysis of a deep excavation: A case study from the Bangkok MRT. J Soils and Foundations 2013; 53(5):756-773.
[30] Brinkgreve RBJ, Bakker KJ, Bonnier PG (2006) The relevance of small-strain soil stiffness in numerical simulation of excavation and tunneling projects. In: Proceedings of 6th European Conference in Geotechnical Engineering, Graz, Ausria, pp 133-139.
[31] PLAXIS (2006) Plaxis user manual (version 8.6). Delft University of Technology & Plaxis BV, The Netherlands.
[32] Schanz T, Vermeer PA, Bonnier PG (1999) The hardening soil model- formulation and verification. In: Proceedings of Plaxis Symposium on Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Balkema, pp 281- 296.
[33] Benz T (2006) Small-Strain Stiffness of Soils and its Numerical Consequences. Doctoral Thesis, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
[34] Aksoy CO, Ogul K, Topal I, Ozer SC, Ozacar V,  Posluk E (2012) Numerical modeling of non-deformable support in swelling and squeezing rock, Int J of Rock Mech & Mining Sciences; Vol 52, pp 61-70