Seismic response of buried pipelines subjected to normal faulting

Authors
1 Dept. of Structural Eng., Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center
2 Earthquake Eng. department, Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center
3 Dept. of Civil Eng., Sharif University of Technology
4 Retrofit expert, Tehran Gas Company
Abstract
Buried pipelines, commonly used to transport water, gas and oil, are critical elements of the infrastructure of today’s modern cities and usually pass through large geographical distances. They are classified as lifelines as they carry materials that are essential to support human life. Due to the importance of maintaining the operability of these lifelines, it is of primary importance to study the effect of different hazards on their behavior in order to be able to mitigate any possible damages. Therefore, they could be subjected to different types of natural hazards such as earthquakes in the form of permanent ground displacement and/or wave propagation. Seismic waves could pose great threats to above ground facilities and perhaps to a lesser content to buried pipelines. Permanent ground displacement is often caused by surface faulting, landslides, or liquefaction. Over the past years, many researchers have attempted to study the behavior of buried pipelines crossing active faults. Many reconnaissance reports show that significant damages are observed in buried steel pipelines crossing active faults. The corresponding ground deformations are applied in a quasi-static manner, and are not necessarily associated with high seismic intensity. During the ground deformation, the pipeline may undergo severe deformation, well beyond the elastic range of pipe material and may cause pipeline failure, i.e. high tensile stresses may result in tensile fracture of the pipe wall, specifically at welds, whereas compressive stresses may cause local buckling or wrinkling of the pipe wall. In case of moderate buckling, deformation of the pipe cross-section can lead to flow restriction and high friction losses, and eventually require line replacement; while for severe buckling high localized strains can lead to pipe rupture, loss of contents, and possible pollution of surrounding soil. The present study investigates the mechanical behavior of buried steel pipelines, crossing normal faults of right angle in loose clay. The pipe is assumed to be normal to the fault plane. The interacting soil–pipeline system is modeled through three-dimensional finite element method, which accounts for large strains and displacements, nonlinear material behavior, friction and gap forming on the soil–pipe interface. The analysis is conducted through an incremental application of fault displacement. Considering steel pipelines of various diameter-to-thickness ratios, and typical steel material for pipeline applications , the present study concentrates on identifying the fault offset at which the pipeline fails considering different performance criteria and to use them for performance-based design purposes. The results are presented in the form of diagram showing the critical fault displacement, and the corresponding critical strain versus the pipe diameter-to-thickness ratio. Results show that for pipelines buried in loose clay, the governing failure mode is local buckling of the pipe wall, which occurs at two locations along the length of the pipeline. The distance between the two locations at which local buckling occurs increases with decreasing pipe diameter-to-thickness ratio. It is shown that with increasing pipe diameter-to-wall thickness ratio, longitudinal compressive strains in the pipe wall increases and consequently the capacity of the pipeline to accommodate the ground deformation decreases significantly.

Keywords


[1] Newmark, N.M., and Hall, W.J. Pipeline Design to Resist Large Fault Displacement. In Proceedings of U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S., June 18-20, 1975, pp. 416–425.
[2] Kennedy, R.P., Chow, A.W., and Williamson, R.A. Fault Movement Effects on Buried Oil Pipeline. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1977, 103(TE5): 617–633.
[3] Wang, L.R.L., and Yeh, Y.H. A Refined Seismic Analysis and Design of Buried Pipeline for Fault Movement. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1985, 13(1): 75-96.
[4] Takada, S., Liang, J.W., and Li, T. Shell-Mode Response of Buried Pipelines to Large Fault Movements, Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998,44A: 1637-1646.
[5] Karamitros, D.K., Bouckovalas, G.D., and Kouretzis, G.P. Stress analysis of buried pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(3): 200-211.
[6] Vazouras, P., Karamanos, S. A., and Dakoulas, P. Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1361-1376.
[7] Vazouras, P., Karamanos, S.A., and Dakoulas, P. Mechanical behavior of buried steel pipes crossing active strike-slip faults, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 41: 164-180.
[8] Joshi, Sh. Prashant, A., Deb, A., and Jain, S. K. Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(7): 930-940.
[9] Rofooei, F.R., Hojat Jalali, H., Attari, Nader K.A., and Alavi, M. Full-Scale Laboratory Testing of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Permanent Ground Displacement Caused by Reverse Faulting. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September 24-28, 2012,Paper No. 4381.
[10] Rofooei, F. R., Hojat Jalali, H., Attari, Nader K. A., Samadian, M. Assessment of the Behavior of Buried Gas Pipelines Subjected to Reverse Faulting, Iran-U.S. Joint Seismic Workshop: Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, Iran 18-20 December, 2012, pp. 105-117.
[11] ABAQUS. Users’ manual. Simulia, Providence, RI, USA; 2011.
[12] API Spec 5L, "Specification for Line Pipe, 41th edition," American Petroleum,1995.
[13] Anastasopoulos I., Callerio A., Bransby M. F., Davies M. C., Nahas A. El, Faccioli E.,Gazetas G., Masella A., Paolucci R., Pecker A., Rossigniol E., "Numerical analyses of fault foundation interaction," Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 6(4) , 2008, p. 645‐675.
[14] Gazetas G, Anastasopoulos I, Apostolou M, "Shallow and deep foundation under fault rapture or strong seismic shaking," In: Pitilakis K,editor. Earth-quake Geotechnical Engineering. Springer, 2007, p. 185–215.
[15] Gresnigt AM. “Plastic design of buried steel pipes in settlement areas,” HERON. 31(4):1986; 1–113.
[16] Kyriakides S, Ju GT. “Bifurcation and localization instabilities in cylindrical shells under bending I: experiments”. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 29:11; 1992; 17–42.
[17] American Society of Civil Engineers. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE 1984; Reston, Va.
[18] American Lifeline Alliance. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. American Society of Civil Engineering, ALA 2005.