Evaluation of Applicability of HSPF Model to Estimate Runoff and Sediment in Abaru Watershed in Hamedan Province

Authors
TarbiatModares University
Abstract
Using of hydrological models for realization hydrological processes in watersheds has been highly developed in recent years and a lot of research has been reported on this topic. The HSPF Model, Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran, is a U.S. EPA program for simulation of watershed hydrology and water quality for both conventional and toxic organic pollutants. The HSPF model uses information such as the time history of rainfall, temperature and solar radiation; land surface characteristics such as land use patterns; and land management practices to simulate the processes that occur in a watershed. The result of the simulation by this model is a time history of the quantity and quality of runoff from an urban or agricultural watershed. Flow rate, sediment load, and nutrient and pesticide concentrations are predicted. HSPF includes an internal database management system to process the large amounts of simulation input and output. The HSPF model is a lumped parameter, deterministic and physically based model. The purpose of this research is assessment of the HSPF model performance for simulating runoff and sediment yield in Abaru watershed in Hamedan province (in Iran). The watershed area is 4142 ha and its elevation ranges from 1957 to 3580 m above the mean sea level. The study area lies between 48○ 28’ and 48○ 42’ E longitude and 34○ 34’ and 34○ 45’ N latitude. The average annual precipitation of this study area is about 313 mm. The most part of the study area has been covered by the soils classified in the C and D hydrologic soil groups. The nearest measuring stations to this study area are Ekbatan Dam evaporation monitoring station and Hamedan airport synoptic station, respectively. The HSPF model was calibrated using field-measured runoff and sediment data at Abaru hydrometric station, located at the outlet of the study area, for the calibration (1996–1997) and the validation (1998-1999) periods. To test the goodness-of-fit of the model to the measured quantities data (runoff and sediment), the correlation coefficient, Mean Error (ME) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were used. The model simulated daily runoff well as corroborated by correlation coefficients of 0.89 and o.87, low mean errors of 0.06 and 0.01 m3/s, and low root mean square errors of 0.19 and 0.08 m3/s, respectively for calibration and validation periods. Unlike runoff simulation, the performance of the model for simulating daily sediment yield was not so good with correlation coefficients of 0.85 and o.67, mean errors of 53.89 and 10.46 ton/month, and root mean square errors of 235.54 and 67.46 ton/month, respectively for calibration and validation periods. The result of this research indicated that the HSPF model could be successfully used for runoff simulation in the study area with limited field measured data.

Keywords

Subjects


[1]  Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.C., Kittle, J.L., Jobes, T.H., and Donigian, A.S., “HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATION PROGRAM FORTRAN: Version 12.2” User’s Manual, 2005.
[2]  Moore, L.W., Matheny, H., Tyree, T., Sabatini, D., and Klaine, S.J., “Agricultural Runoff Modeling in a Small West Tennessee Watershed”, Research Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 60 (2), pp. 242–249, 1988.
[3]  Chew, C.R., Moore, L.W., and Smiths, R.H., “Hydrological Simulation of Tennessee's North Reelfoot Creek Watershed”, Research Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 63(10), pp. 10–16, 1991.
[4]  Jacomino, V.M.F., and Fields, D.E, “A Critical Approach to the Calibration of a Watershed Model”, Journal of American Water Resource Association, 33(1), pp. 143–154, 1997.
[5]  Fontaine, T.A., and Jacomino, V.M.F., “Sensitivity Analysis of Simulation Contaminated Sediment Transport”, Journal of American Water Resource Association, 33(2), pp. 313–326, 1997.
[6]  Carrubba, L., “Hydrological Modeling at the Watershed Scale Using NPSM”,Journal of American Water Resource Association, 36 (6), pp. 1237–1246, 2000.
[7]  Engelmann, C.J.K., Ward, A.D., Christy, A.D., and Bair, E.S., “Application of the BASINS Database and NPSM Model on a Small Ohio Watershed”, Journal of American Water Resource Association, 38 (1), pp. 289–300, 2002.
[1]  Johnsona, M.S., Coon, W.F., Mehta, V.K., Steenhuisa, T.S., Brooks, E.S., and Bol, J., “Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hill slope dominated watershed in the northeastern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR”, Journal of Hydrology, 285, pp. 57–76, 2003.
[2]  Albek, M., O¨g˘u¨tveren, U¨., and Albek, E., “Hydrological modeling of SeydiSuyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF”, Journal of Hydrology, 285, pp. 260–271, 2004.
[3]      Mitsov, B.D., and Wang, X., “Exploring the Variability in Suspended Sediment Yield Using BASINS-HSPF and Probabilistic Modeling: Implications for Land Use Planning”, Journal of Environmental Informatics, 9(1), pp. 29-40, 2007.
[4]      Mishra, A., Kar, S., and Singh, V.P., “Determination of runoff and sediment yield from a small watershed in sub-humid subtropics using the HSPF model”, Hydro Process, 21, pp. 3035–3045, 2007.
[5]      Woonsup, C., and Deal, B.M., “Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling fortheKishwaukee River basin (USA)” , Journal of Environmental Management, 88, pp. 1119–1130, 2008.
[6]      Al-Abed, N., and Al-Sharif, M., “Hydrological Modeling of Zarqa River Basin – Jordan Using the Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) Model”, Water Resource Manage, 22, pp. 1203–1220, 2008.
[7]      Mishra, A., Kar, S., and Raghuwanshi, N., “Modeling Nonpoint Source Pollutant Losses from a Small Watershed Using HSPF Model”, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(2), pp. 92–100, 2009.
[8]      Liu, Z. and Tong, S. T. Y., “Using HSPF to Model the Hydrologic and Water Quality Impacts of Riparian Land-Use Change in a Small Watershed”, Journal of Environmental Informatics, 17(1), pp. 1-14, 2011.
[9]   فرهادی، ع.ا.، «ارزیابی اثر مدیریت حوضه ی آبریز بر رسوب گذاری و عمر مفید سد اکباتان»، پایان­نامه ی کارشناسی­ارشد مهندسی کشاورزی، گرایش سازه­های آبی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 1377.
[1]   نصیری صالح ف، علوی نیام، «مقایسه ی دو روش تقلیل مقیاس زمانی بارش برای شبیه سازی رواناب با استفاده از یک مدل سطح خشکی»، هشتمین کنگره ی بین المللی مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه شیراز، 1388.
[2]      Hummel, P., Kittle, J., Jr., and Gray, M., “A Tool for Managing Watershed Modeling Time-Series Data WDMUtilVersion 2.0”, User's Manual, AQUA TERRA Consultants, 2001.
 [3]   گنجی نوروزی، ز.، «بررسی عدم قطعیت حجم مخازن سدها: مطالعه موردی سد اکباتان»، پایان­نامه ی کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی کشاورزی، گرایش سازه های آبی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 1385.