Investigating the Effect of Sample Preparation Method and Plastic Fines Content on the Behavior of Sands

Authors
Tarbiat Modares University
Abstract
Previous investigation has been shown that there are several sample preparation method to model the sand or silty sand behaviors. Methods like Dry Funnel Deposition (DFD), Water Sedimentation (WS), Slurry Deposition (SD), Water Pluviation (WP), Moist Tamping (MT) and Air Pluviation (AP) are some of the mentioned methods. Each method may be useful to model the behavior of some special deposited soils. For example, DFD is the best method to model the natural deposition of silty sands, while the WS method is suitable for modeling the sands natural deposition in the rivers. MT method is the best method to simulate the behavior of compacted embankments while SD method is suitable to prevent the segregation of particles in respect to other methods like Water Pluviation. Effect of sample preparation methods on the sands and silty sands behavior is investigated to some extent, while the clayey sands are rarely investigated. In order to investigate about the effect of sample preparation method and also clay content on the behavior of sands, some specimens were prepared using air pluviation and moist tamping method and tested under undrain consolidated condition using a monotonic triaxial device. To have uniform specimens with good repetition in sample preparation, a new sample preparation device using air pluviation method was invented by the authors. Specimens of clean and clayey sand mixtures were prepared using different drop height and flow rates. The dry unit weight of all specimens was increased with increase of drop height, while increase of flow rate leads to the decrease of dry unit weight. Also, some specimens were prepared using moist tamping method in order to compare the results. A modified Ladd technique was applied to have the uniform specimens in the moist tamping method. In modified Ladd technique (Under compaction method), the initial layers are compacted with lower density, while they reach the desired density during the taping of the upper layers. This method prevents the more compacted lower layers, which is usually occurred in the usual moist tamping method. Based on the results, it was concluded that the air pluviated specimens usually behave in strain hardening manner with dilative properties, while moist tamped specimens tends to behave in strain softening manner. In addition, some valuable results are presented about the variation of liquefaction potential. It was seen that the steady state line of sand mixed with 10 percent clay is lower than the steady state line of clean sand in the e-Lnp’ plan, which is the sign of more liquefaction potential in clayey sand mixture. Also, the internal friction angle was found to be lower in clayey sand mixture in respect to clean sand. The interpretation of the results shows that two interaction manner can be distinguished between sand and clay particles; one of them is easy slippage between sand particles due to locating clay particles between them and the other is increasing the friction and cohesion between sand particles due to plasticity of clay particles. The latter will decrease the slippage between sand particles. Effect of each interaction is investigated separately using the obtained results.

Keywords


[1]  Mitchell, James K., Soga, Kenichi., “Fundamentals of Soil Behavior,”. John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
[2]  Vaid, Y.P., Kuerbis, R.,“Sand Sample Preparation – The Slurry Deposition Method,” Journal of Soils and Foundations, 28(4) , PP. 107- 118, 1988.
[3]  Wood, Fletcher M., Yamamuro, Jerry A. and Lade, Poul V., “Effect of Depositional Method on the Undrained Response of Silty Sand” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(11), pp. 1525-1537, 2008.
[4]  Oda, M., Koishikawa, I., and Higuehi, T,“Experimental study of Anisotropic Shear Strength of Sand by Plane Strain Test,” Journal of Soils and Foundations, 18(1), PP 25-38, 1978.
[5]  Oda, Masanobu,”Deformation Mechanism of Sand in Triaxial Compression Test. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, VOL 12, NO 4, pp. 45 – 63, 1972.
[6]  Oda, M., “The Mechanism of Fabric Changes during Compressional deformation of sand,” Journal of Soils and Foundations, 12(2), PP. 1-18, 1972.
[1]  Vaid, Y.P., Sivathayalan, S., and Stedman, D., “Influence of Specimen-Reconstituting Method on the undrained Response of Sand,”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 22(3), pp. 187-196, 1999.
[2]  Yasrobi, S.S. "Investigating the Effects of Content and Shapes of Fines on Steady State Behavioural Properties of Saturated Sands to Assess Liquefaction Potential in Such Soils" Thesis for PhD. Civil Engineering School. Sharif University of Technology, 1376.
[3]  Ishihara,K.,"Liquefaction and flow failure duringearthquakes" Geotechnique, VOL43, No.3, 351-415, 1993.
[4]      Vaid, Y.P. and Negussey, D., “Preparation of Reconstituted Sand Specimens.” Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977, PP. 405-417, 1988.
[5]      Jang, Deh-Jeng., “Quantification Of Sand Structure and Its Evolution During Shearing Using Image Analysis”, Phd Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1997.
[6]      Lagioia, Rocco., Sanzeni, Alex., and Colleselli, Francesco. “Air, Water and Vacuum Pluviation of sand Specimens for the Triaxial Apparatus” Journal of Soils and Foundations, 46(1) , PP 61-67, 2006.
[7]      Chen, Yao-Chung., Chuang, Jiun-Chi., “Effects of Fabric on Steady State and Liquefaction Resistance,” Proceeding of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Stavanger, norway, pp 524-529, 2001.
[8]      Ladd,R.S., "Preparing specimens using under compaction"ASTM, Geotechnical Testing journal ,GTGODJ ,VOL1,No.1,pp16-23, 1978.
[9]      Rathje, E. M., Chang, W. J., and Stokoe II, K. H. Development of an In Situ Dynamic Liquefaction Test, Geotechnical Testing Journal,GTJODJ, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 50-60, 2005.
[10]  Hazırbaba,K. Pore Pressure Generation Characteristics of Sands and Silty Sands: A Strain Approach, PhD Thesis, University of Texas, 2005.
[11]  Vaid Y. Liquefaction of silty soils. In:Prakash S, Dakoulas P (eds) Ground failures under seismic conditions. ASCE Geotech Spec Publ 44:55–56, 1994.
[1]      Yamamuro, J.A., and Wood, F.M. Effect of depositional method on the undrained behavior and microstructure of sand with silt. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24: 751, 760. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn. 2004.06.004, 2004.
[2]      Fletcher M. Wood, Jerry A. Yamamuro, and Poul V. Lade “Effect of depositional method on the undrained response of silty sand” Can. Geotech. J. 45: pp:1525–1537, 2008.
[3]      Yimsiri, Siam., Soga, Kenichi., “Effects of Soil Fabric on Behaviors of Granular Soils: Microscopic Modeling” Computers and Geotechnics, 38, pp 861-874, 2011.
[4]      Georgiannou, V. N., Burland, J. B. & Hight, D. W.,"The undrained behaviour of clayey sands in triaxial compression and extension" Geotechnique 40, No. 3, 431-449, 1990.
[5]      Ovando-Shelley,E. , Perez G., B. E., "Undrained behaviour of clayey sands in load controlled triaxial tests" Geootechnique 47, No. 1, pp97-111, 1997.
[6]      Bouferra.R . Shahrour.I., "Influence of fines on the resistance to liquefaction of a clayey sand" Laboratoire de Me´canique de Lille,Universityof Sciences and Technologies of Lille, Polytech Lille, France, 2003.
[1]      Castro,G. "Liquefaction of sands "Harvard Soil Mechanics Series , No.81 ,Cambridge, 1969.
[2]      AlarconGuzman,A.,Lwonards,G.,Chameau,J.I. "Undrain monotonic and cyclic strength of sands"Journal Of Geotechnical Eng .ASCE ,VOL.114. No10, pp.1089-1109, 1988.
[3]      Kramer, SandSeed, H.B., "Initiation of soil liquefaction under static loading condition " Journal Of Geotechnical Eng .ASCE,VOL.114.No4,pp.412-430, 1988.
[4]      Abedi, M. and Yasrobi, S.S, “Evaluation the Effects of plastic fines on the instability of sand”, Journal of Soil dynamic and earthquake engineering, 30, PP 61-67, 2010.
[5]   درخشندی، مهدی “مطالعه آزمایشگاهی اثر مصالح ریزدانه پلاستیک بر پتانسیل روانگرایی ماسه ها" پایان نامه ی دوره دکتری، دانشگاه امیر کبیر، 1385.