بررسی رفتار ستون‌های فولادی با مقاطع عرضی مختلف تحت بار انفجار

نویسندگان
دانشگاه صنعتی شیراز
چکیده
حملات تروریستی در مجاورت ساختمان‌ها و اماکن حیاتی، منجر به فروپاشی جزئی یا کلی آنها و از بین رفتن سرمایه‌های یک کشور می‌شود. انفجار از جمله‌ پدیده‌های پیچیده و با نرخ کرنش بالا می‌باشد که در رفتار المان‌های سازه‌ای و مصالح به شدت تاثیر‌گذار است. در این مقاله، رفتار ستون‌های فولادی با مقاطع عرضی مختلف، تحت بار انفجار مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. جهت دستیابی به مقطع با عملکرد مطلوب‌تر، از آنالیز دینامیکی غیرخطی توسط نرم‌افزار اجزاء محدود LS-DYNA استفاده شده است. جهت صحت‌سنجی، نتایج حاصل از شبیه‌سازی عددی با نتایج یک مدل آزمایشگاهی مقایسه شده است. سپس ستون‌ با مقطع عرضی بال پهن، صلیبی و قوطی ، تحت شرایط مرزی دو انتها گیردار و دو انتها مفصل در معرض دو زاویه گسترش موج انفجار صفر و 45 درجه، شبیه‌سازی و پاسخ آن‌ها با یکدیگر مقایسه شده است. بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که ستون با مقطع عرضی بال پهن در زاویه انفجار صفر درجه نسبت به مقاطع عرضی دیگر حول محور قوی، جابجایی کمتر و عملکرد مطلوب‌تری دارد. همچنین در زاویه انفجار 45 درجه مقاطع عرضی دارای دو محور قوی، جابجایی کمتر و عملکرد مطلوب‌تری را نسبت به مقطع بال‌پهن با یک محور قوی نشان می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Investigation of Steel Column Behavior with Different Cross Section under Blast Loading

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Ali Hadianfard
Adel Nemati
Ali Johari
Shiraz university of technology
چکیده English

Terrorist attacks and explosions in the vicinity of buildings and vital areas are happening in different countries repetitively. Most of these incidents lead to global and local failure in the main elements of the buildings and in some cases due to intensity of explosions can occur entire structure collapses. Columns are the key bearing elements in the building, and between all columns, the exterior of them are more vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Usually blast resistant design of structure is carried out by simplifying the models and considering a single column with nonlinear behavior under blast loading. Explosion is a complex phenomenon with high strain rate, which affects strongly on behavior and material property of structural elements. Operation of experimental test on structures under blast load is very expensive, difficult and dangerous. Hence, simulation of experimental models using nonlinear finite element software is very useful. In this paper, to achieve better performance of columns under blast loading, the response of steel columns with different cross-sections has been investigated. In addition, effects of blast wave incidence angle, blast distance and different boundary conditions are considered. For this purpose, wide flange steel column of experimental test has been simulated under axial force and blast load using LS-DYNA software. Numerical model is simulated using shell elements and its result has been validated with the full scale blast experimental data. In the finite element analysis the effects of high strain rate and material nonlinearity are considered. The columns with different cross sections of wide flange, cross-IPE and box sections are simulated under two angles of blast waves extensive, zero and 45 degree. Also, two support conditions of fixed-fixed end and pinned-pinned end have been considered. The results show in the both boundary conditions for blast with zero angle, the dynamic response of column with wide flange section subject to blast load has been less than the other cross sections. Also, the box section has better performance than cross-IPE. In 45 degree blast angle and fixed end boundary conditions, the displacement time history of box column is less than two other sections and it shows better performance respect to other sections. But, under pined end boundary conditions, cross-IPE section has better and stronger behavior respect to wide flange and box sections. In addition, the displacement of wide flange section (section with non-identical strong axes) in 45 degree blast angle has more than zero degree. However, in the columns of box and cross-IPE section under the same explosion situation in 45 degree blast angle, the dynamic response is less than zero degree, because they have two identical strong axes. Then for corner columns of buildings that direction of blast wave propagation may be 45 degree the best section (based on minimum deflection criteria) is column section with two strong axes such as box and cross-IPE, however for peripheral middle column of building that bending moment of explosion may be accrued about strong axis, the wide flange section with only one strong axis is better. Various distances of explosion from column cause different nonlinear behavior, therefore investigation of optimum column cross section under blast loading depends to distance of explosion from the column. Then displacement criteria may be not enough and use of additional criteria such as residual load bearing capacity can be appropriate.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

LS-DYNA
nonlinear dynamic analysis
Blast load
Steel column
 
[1]           Biggs, J. M., & Testa, B., "Introduction to structural dynamics", McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.
[2]           Nassr, A. A., Razaqpur, A. G., Tait, M. J., Campidelli, M., & Foo, S., "Single and multi degree of freedom analysis of steel beams under blast loading", Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 242, pp. 63-77, 2012.
[3]           Krauthammer, T., Bazeos, N., & Holmquist, T.,"Modified SDOF analysis of RC box-type structures", Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 112, pp. 726-744, 1986.
[4]           Miyamoto, H. K., & Taylor, D., "Structural control of dynamic blast loading using passive energy dissipaters", In SEAOC 1999 Convention, pp. 299-317. 1999.
[5]           Magallanes, J. M., Martinez, R., & Koenig, J. W., "Experimental results of the AISC full-scale column blast test", Rep. TR-06, vol. 20, 2006.
[6]           Nassr, A. A., Razaqpur, A. G., Tait, M. J., Campidelli, M., & Foo, S., "Dynamic Response of Steel Columns Subjected to Blast Loading", Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 140, No.7, 2013.
[7] مرتضایی، ع. ، " مطالعه­ موردی یک ساختمان بتن آرمه مقاوم در برابر زلزله تحت اثر بارگذاری انفجار"، پژوهشنامه زلزله شناسی و مهندسی زلزله، سال شانزدهم، شماره اول، 1392.          
[8] محتشمی، ا. ، سینایی، س. ، شوشتری، ا. ، "ارزیابی قاب­های فولادی در برابر بارهای انفجار"، پنجمین گنگره ملی مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، 1389.
[9] شیروند، م. ، ر. ، شعبانی، م. ، ج. ، "ارزیابی رفتار سازه­های فولادی قاب خمشی ویژه و قاب مهاربندی تحت اثر بارگذاری انفجاری"، مجله علمی و پژوهشی علوم و فناوری­های پدافند غیرعامل، شماره 2، ص 114-109، 1392.
 [10] Lee, K., Kim, T. and Kim J., "Local response of W-shaped steel columns under blast loading", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 31, pp. 25-38, 2009.
[11] Hadianfard, M. A., Farahani, A., & Bahadori-Jahromi, A., "On the effect of steel columns cross sectional properties on the behaviours when subjected to blast loading", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 449-463, 2012.
[12] Yandzio, E., & Gough, M., "Protection of buildings against explosions", Steel Construction Institute UK, 1999.
[13] Bangash, T., "Explosion-resistant buildings: design, analysis, and case studies", Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2006.
[14] Goel, M. D., Matsagar, V. A., Gupta, A. K., & Marburg, S., "An abridged review of blast wave parameters", Defence Science Journal, vol. 62, pp. 300-306, 2012.
[15] UFC 3-340-02, "Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions", Department of Defense, Unified Facilities Criteria, Washington, DC, 2008.
[16] Applied Research Associates (ARA), Inc., "A.T.-Blast program", Protective Glazing Council, 2007.  http://www.protectiveglazing.org
[17] Hyde, D., "CONWEP: Conventional weapons effects program", US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, USA, 1991.
[18] Hallquist, J. O., "LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual", Livermore Software Technology Corporation, vol. 970, 2007.
[19] Jones, N., "Structural impact", Cambridge university press, 2011.
[20] Nassr, A. A., Razaqpur, A. G., Tait, M. J., Campidelli, M., & Foo, S., "Strength and stability of steel beam columns under blast load", International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 55, pp. 34-48, 2013.
[21] Jayasooriya, R., Thambiratnam, D. P., & Perera, N. J., "Blast response and safety evaluation of a composite column for use as key element in structural systems", Engineering Structures, vol. 61, pp. 31-43, 2014.