Volume 18, Issue 6 (2018)                   MCEJ 2018, 18(6): 51-61 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

chakherlou J, Shervani Tabar B. Use of limestone powder instead of a part of silica sand in reactive powder concrete. MCEJ 2018; 18 (6) :51-61
URL: http://mcej.modares.ac.ir/article-16-16686-en.html
1- Master of Civil-Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
2- member of Academy Staff Civil Eng. Department, Faculty of Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (8286 Views)
In the production of reactive powdered concrete, fine-grained powder materials such as quartz sand, microsilica, and quartz powder are used as materials. This concrete has a high compressive strength compared to conventional concrete, which has attracted much attention in recent years. With this type of concrete, the weight of the structure can be significantly reduced, and its important features include high compressive strength, low permeability, durability and high abrasion resistance and high ductility that can absorb more energy during an earthquake. . In this research, we want to use limestone powder instead of a part of silica sand. For this purpose, after obtaining optimal mixing scheme based on the compressive strength and flow strength and diffusion diameter of the flow table, first replace the limestone powder with 0, 10, 20, 30 instead of silica sand, and then the powder Limestone has been used as a substitute-additive with different percentages and designs. The experiments performed on these samples included the psychological testing of the flow table and water absorption during treatment and compressive strength at the age of 7, 28 and 90 days. The results of the experiments show that by increasing the limestone powder up to 20% replacement with silica sand increases compressive strength, reduces very little in the psychological and also reduces water absorption during processing. In the production of reactive powdered concrete, fine-grained powder materials such as quartz sand, microsilica, and quartz powder are used as materials. This concrete has a high compressive strength compared to conventional concrete, which has attracted much attention in recent years. With this type of concrete, the weight of the structure can be significantly reduced, and its important features include high compressive strength, low permeability, durability and high abrasion resistance and high ductility that can absorb more energy during an earthquake. . In this research, we want to use limestone powder instead of a part of silica sand. For this purpose, after obtaining optimal mixing scheme based on the compressive strength and flow strength and diffusion diameter of the flow table, first replace the limestone powder with 0, 10, 20, 30 instead of silica sand, and then the powder Limestone has been used as a substitute-additive with different percentages and designs. The experiments performed on these samples included the psychological testing of the flow table and water absorption during treatment and compressive strength at the age of 7, 28 and 90 days. The results of the experiments show that by increasing the limestone powder up to 20% replacement with silica sand increases compressive strength, reduces very little in the psychological and also reduces water absorption during processing. In the production of reactive powdered concrete, fine-grained powder materials such as quartz sand, microsilica, and quartz powder are used as materials. This concrete has a high compressive strength compared to conventional concrete, which has attracted much attention in recent years. With this type of concrete, the weight of the structure can be significantly reduced, and its important features include high compressive strength, low permeability, durability and high abrasion resistance and high ductility that can absorb more energy during an earthquake. . In this research, we want to use limestone powder instead of a part of silica sand. For this purpose, after obtaining optimal mixing scheme based on the compressive strength and flow strength and diffusion diameter of the flow table, first replace the limestone powder with 0, 10, 20, 30 instead of silica sand, and then the powder Limestone has been used as a substitute-additive with different percentages and designs. The experiments performed on these samples included the psychological testing of the flow table and water absorption during treatment and compressive strength at the age of 7, 28 and 90 days. The results of the experiments show that by increasing the limestone powder up to 20% replacement with silica sand increases compressive strength, reduces very little in the psychological and also reduces water absorption during processing.
Full-Text [PDF 869 kb]   (3665 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Manuscript | Subject: Earthquake
Received: 2018/01/7 | Accepted: 2024/01/2 | Published: 2019/03/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.