افت انرژی دریچه‌های کشویی تحت شرایط جریان آزاد و مستغرق

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل (کامل)

نویسنده
گروه مهندسی آب، سازه های آبی، دانشگاه تبریز
چکیده
معمولاً برای اندازه­گیری دبی آب و تنظیم سطح آب در کانال­های باز از دریچه­های کشویی استفاده می­شود. برآورد افت انرژی نسبی (DE/E0) و ضریب دبی (Cd) یک دریچه کشویی برای طراحی کانال‌های باز ضروری است. با در نظر گرفتن سطح آب پایین دست، ممکن است شرایط جریان آزاد یا مستغرق رخ دهد. اگرچه برخی از تحقیقات برای تعیین Cd برای دریچه­های کشویی انجام شده است، ولی بررسی منابع نشان می­دهد که مطالعه­ای در مورد DE/E0 وجود ندارد. دانستن DE/E0 برای طراحی آبگیرها و تعیین رقوم کف کانال آبیاری ضروری است. هدف این تحقیق، تعیین DE/E0 و Cd با استفاده از نتایج آزمایشگاهی است. نتایج نشان داد که افت انرژی را نمی­توان در سازه­های آبگیر و طراحی کانال نادیده گرفت و تاثیر آنها بر رقوم کف کانال­های فرعی دریافت کننده آب از کانال­های اصلی باید در نظر گرفته شود. افت انرژی نسبی از حداقل مقدار 271/0 تا حداکثر مقدار 604/0 تغییر نشان داد. برای محاسبه استهلاک انرژی نسبی از روش رگرسیون چند متغیره بهره برده شد و میانگین باقیمانده ها 004/0- بود. حداکثر و حداقل باقیمانده برای DE/E0 به ترتیب 5 و 31/0- است. برای تفکیک مرز جریان آزاد از جریان مستغرق، یک معادله ریاضی با ضریب تعیین 925/0 ارائه شد. برای تخمین ضریب دبی در جریان مستغرق، یک معادله ریاضی بدست آمد. برای این معادله، میانگین باقیمانده­ها 004/0- بود. حداکثر و حداقل باقیمانده برای ضریب دبی به ترتیب 084/0- و 116/0 است. همچنین در این تحقیق، با استفاده از مدل­های رگرسیون غیرخطی چند متغیره، اقدام به برآورد DE و Cd می­شود که در طراحی خط پروژه کانال­های روباز مورد استفاده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Energy loss for sluice gates under free and submerged flow conditions

نویسنده English

Farzin Salmasi
Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz
چکیده English

Sluice gates are commonly used to measure water discharge and to adjust the water level in open canals. Sluice gates can also be used at the crest of dam spillways for controlling floods. Estimation of head loss (∆E/E0) and discharge coefficients (Cd) for a sluice gate is essential for the design of open canals. Depending on the downstream water level, free or submerged flow conditions may occur. Although there have been some investigations on Cd for sluice gates, a comprehensive literature review shows that there are no studies of ∆E/E0 (to the best knowledge of the authors). Knowledge of ∆E/E0 is necessary for the design of intakes and irrigation canal inverts. This study uses the physical model of sluice gate to introduce helpful charts for energy loss estimation. Experiments were conducted in the University of Tabriz, department of water engineering. A rectangular canal with length of 12 m, width of 0.5 m and height of 0.8 m was used. Vertical slide gate was installed at the 6 m from canal inlet to permit flow become uniform. Water circulation is carried out using a submerged pump. Water is pumped in a 4.5 m head tank and then inters to canal with pipes. Water level/depth was measured with a point gauge with 0.1 mm accuracy. Discharge was measured with a calibrated rectangular sharp crested weir. Experiments were carried out with different discharges and gate opening. Results show that ∆E for free flow is greater than that for submerged flow conditions. Meanwhile, discharge coefficients in a free flow are greater than those under submerged flow conditions. Relative energy losses (∆E/E0) have a minimum value of 0.271 and a maximum value of 0.604. These high energy losses cannot be ignored in intake structures and canal-designing processes and their impact on minor canal inverts receiving water from main canals should be considered. The relative energy loss changed from the minimum value of 0.271 to the maximum value of 0.604. Multivariate regression method was used to calculate the relative energy loss and the average of the residuals was -0.004. The maximum and minimum residuals for ∆E/E0 are 5 and -0.31, respectively. A mathematical equation with a coefficient of determination of 0.925 was presented to separate the boundary of free flow from submerged flow. To estimate the discharge coefficient in submerged flow, a mathematical equation was obtained. For this equation, the average of the residuals was -0.004. The maximum and minimum residuals for the discharge coefficient are -0.084 and 0.116, respectively. Application of multiple non-linear regression (MNR) models are presented for predicting ∆E/E0 and Cd. The high energy losses cannot be ignored in intake structures and canal designing processes. Their impact on minor canal inverts receiving water from main canals should be considered. Application of MNR was presented from a simple equation to more sophisticated equations by improving regression relations in each step. The MNR method provides accurate equations for predicting performance for both ∆E and Cd.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Head loss
Sluice gate
Multiple non-linear regression
Submerged flow
Discharge coefficient
[1] Yahyaee, A.R., Moridi, A., Sarang, A., 2021. A new optimized model to control eutrophication in multi-purpose reservoirs. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
[2] Salmasi F, (2018). Effect of downstream apron elevation and downstream submergence in discharge coefficient of Ogee weir, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 27:4, 375-384
[3] Mousavi SN, Farsadizadeh D, Salmasi F, Hosseinzadeh Dalir A, (2020). Evaluation of pressure fluctuations coefficient along the USBR Type II stilling basin using experimental results and AI models, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.
[4] Erdbrink CD, Krzhizhanovskaya VV, Sloot PMA, 2014. Free-surface flow simulations for discharge-based operation of hydraulic structure gates. Journal of Hydroinformatics. 16 (1):189–206. 5
[5] Quang LX, Nakamura K., Hung T., Tinh NV, Matsuda S, Kadota K, Horino H, Hai PT, Komatsu H, Hasegawa K, Fukuda S, Hirata J, Oura N, Kishimoto-Mo AW, Yonemura S, Onishi T, 2019. Effect of organizational paddy water management by a water user group on methane and nitrous oxide emissions and rice yield in the Red River Delta, Vietnam, Agricultural Water Management, 217, 179-192,
[6] Akbari, M., Salmasi, F., Arvanaghi, H., Karbasi, M., Farsadizadeh, D., 2019. Application of Gaussian process regression model to predict discharge coefficient of gated piano key weir. Water Resource Management 33, 3929–3947.
[7] Ghosh MK, Dutta S, Sen D, 2014. Sediment flush out from pond of river diversion barrages by gate operation. Water Resour Manage 28, 5335–5356.
[8] Henry, H.R., 1950. Discussion of ’Diffusion of submerged jets’ by Albertson ML., Dai YB, Jensen RA and Rouse H. Trans. ASCE, 115:687–694.
[9] Rajaratnam, N., Subramanya, K. 1967a. Flow immediately below a submerged sluice gate. J. Hydraul. Div., 93(HY4), 57–77.
[10] Ramamurthy, A.S., Submmanya, K., Pani, B.S. 1978. Sluice Gates with High Discharge Coefficients, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. ASCE, 104(IR4), 437-441.
[11] Swamee, P. K., 1992, Sluice-gate Discharge Equations, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 118(1): 56–60,
[12] Swamee, P. K., Pathak, S. K., Talib, M., and Ojaha, C. S. P., 2000, Discharge Characteristics of Skew Sluice Gates, J. of Irrigation and Drainage. ASCE, 126(5): 328-334, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:5(328).
[13] do Amaral LGH, Righes AA, Souza Filho PDS, Dalla Costa R, 2005. Automatic regulator for channel flow control on flooded rice. Agricultural Water Management, 75 (3), 184-193,
[14] Belaud, G., Cassan, L., Baume, J.P., 2009. Calculation of Contraction Coefficient under Sluice Gates and Application to Discharge Measurement, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000122
[15] Silva, C.O., Rijo, M. 2017. Flow Rate Measurements under Sluice Gates, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng, 143-06017001,
[16] Li, Y.K., He, X. L., Qiu, L.C., Chen, J., Han, Y. 2018. Experimental investigation of discharge characteristics of float type sluice gate, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 191-012094,
[17] Nasehi Oskuyi N., Salmasi F. 2012. Vertical Sluice Gate Discharge Coefficient. J. Civil Eng. Urban. 2(3): 108-114.
[18] Vatankhah AR, Hoseini P, 2021. Discharge equation for round gates in turnout pipes: Dimensional analysis and theoretical approaches, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 47 (1).
[19] Khalili Shayan H, Farhoudi J, Vatankhah AR, 2021, Experimental and field verifications of radial gates as flow measurement structures, Water Science & Technology Water Supply,
[20] Hoseini P, Vatankhah AR, 2021. Stage-discharge relationship for slide gates installed in partially full pipes, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 77, 101838,
[21] Rajaratnam, N. 1977. Free-Flow Immediately below Sluice Gates, J. of Hydraulic Engg. ASCE, 103(HY4), 345-351.
[22] Clemmens J, Strelkoff TS, Replogle JA, 2003. Calibration of Submerged Radial Gates. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129 (9), 680-687.
[24] Habibzadeh A, Vatankhah AR, Rajaratnam N, 2011. Role of energy loss on discharge characteristics of sluice gates. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137 (9), 1079-1084.
[25] Rajaratnam, N., Subramanya, K. 1967b. Flow Equation for the Sluice Gate, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 93(3):167–186.
[26] Salmasi F, Nouri M, Abraham J (2019). Laboratory Study of the Effect of Sills on Radial Gate Discharge Coefficient. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,
[27] Salmasi F, Abraham J (2020). Predicting seepage from unlined earthen channels using the finite element method and multi variable nonlinear regression. Agricultural Water Management. 234 (2020) 106148.
[28] Salmasi F, Abraham J, (2020). Expert System for Determining Discharge Coefficients for Inclined Slide Gates Using Genetic Programming. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 146 (12): 06020013-9,
[29] Salmasi F, Abraham J (2020). Prediction of discharge coefficients for sluice gates equipped with different geometric sills under the gate using multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), Journal of Hydrology, 597, 125728,