ارزیابی و بهبود رفتار دیوارهای برشی صفحه فولادی با استفاده از سخت‌کننده‌های فولادی- بتنی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل (کامل)

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مراغه، مراغه، ایران
2 استادیار دانشکده مهندسی عمران، واحد مراغه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مراغه، ایران
3 استاد دانشکده مهندسی عمران دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
چکیده

دیوارهای برشی فولادی در ساختمان‌های مختلف به عنوان سیستم مقاوم در برابر بارهای جانبی مورد استفاده قرار گرفته‌اند. برتری ویژه این نوع دیوارها، قابلیت شکل‌پذیری مناسب، سختی اولیه بالا و قدرت استهلاک انرژی زیاد می‌باشد. و لیکن دیوار برشی فولادی به علت هندسه خاص خود، دچار کمانش در محدوده ارتجاعی می­شود. برای جلوگیری از کمانش ورق فولادی در دیوارهای برشی فولادی دو راه‌حل کلی وجود دارد استفاده از سخت‌کننده‌های فلزی و یا بهره گرفتن از پوشش بتنی که از طریق برشگیرها به ورق فولادی متصل می‌شود. بر این اساس، در تحقیق حاضر به ارائه راهکاری به منظور بهبود عملکرد لرزه‌ای دیوارهای برشی مرکب نوین فولادی- بتنی پرداخته شده است. با استفاده از روش المان محدود و به کمک نرم‌افزار ABAQUS، به بررسی تأثیر مشخصات هندسی سخت‌کننده‌های فولادی بر عملکرد لرزه‌ای دیوار برشی مرکب نوین فولادی-بتنی پرداخته شده است. پس از مدل‌سازی دیوار برشی کامپوزیتی فولادی- بتنی و صحت‌سنجی مدل عددی با نتایج آزمایشگاهی، اثر پارامترهایی مانند تعداد سخت‌کننده­ها، نوع چیدمان شامل عمودی، افقی، مورب و ترکیبی، بر روی حداکثر ظرفیت باربری دیوار برشی مرکب، شکل پذیری، استهلاک انرژی، توزیع تنش و حالت‌های خرابی بررسی شده است. نتایج این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد استفاده از سخت‌کننده‌های فولادی T شکل و نحوه چیدمان آنها تاثیر قابل ملاحظه‌ای در ظرفیت باربری دیوار‌های برشی کامپوزیت فولادی- بتنی دارد. استفاده از سخت‌کننده­های مورب ظرفیت دیوارهای برشی فولادی را تا 25 درصد افزایش می‌دهد. استفاده از سخت کننده­های قطری T شکل فولادی در دیوارهای برشی کامپوزیت نسبت به دیوار برشی کامپوزیت بدون سخت کننده فولادی، باعث کاهش چشمگیر در آسیب سخت کننده بتنی و همچنین باعث افزایش ضریب شکل‌پذیری، ضریب اضافه مقاومت و استهلاک انرژی به ترتیب حدود 39، 124و 18 درصد می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation and improvement of the behavior of steel plate shear walls using steel-concrete stiffeners

نویسندگان English

Hadi Zarrintala 1
ahmad maleki 2
Mohamadali Lotfollahi-Yaghin 3
1 Ph.D Student at Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch, Maragheh, Iran
2 Assistant Professor at Department of Civil Engineering, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
3 Professor at Civil Engineering Department of Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract

Steel shear walls have been used in various buildings as a system to resist lateral loads. The special advantage of this type of wall is its good malleability, high initial hardness, and high energy consumption power. But due to its special geometry, the steel shear wall undergoes buckling in the elastic range. To prevent steel sheet buckling in steel shear walls, there are two general solutions: using metal stiffeners or using concrete cover that is connected to steel sheet through shears. Based on this research, a solution has been proposed to improve the seismic performance of modern steel-concrete composite shear walls. The composite steel shear wall is a modern lateral bearing system consisting of a steel sheet with a reinforced concrete cover, which is connected to the sheet from one side or both sides by clips. In the composite steel shear wall, the reinforced concrete cover, by restraining the steel sheet and preventing its buckling, increases the shear capacity of the steel shear wall to the point of yielding in shearing inside the plate instead of tension in the direction of the tensile field. The composite steel shear wall, while increasing the shear capacity of the system, increases the resistance of the panel against destructive factors such as corrosion, fire, impact, explosion, and other cases and causes a reduction of more than 25 to 50 percent in the consumption of steel in medium and large buildings. In the new composite steel shear wall system, a distance is created between the concrete cover and the boundary beams and columns. Tests on conventional and modern composite steel shear walls show that the modern system has little damage compared to the conventional system. From nonlinear static analysis using the finite element method and with the help of ABAQUS software, the influence of the geometric characteristics of steel stiffeners on the seismic performance of the modern steel-concrete composite shear wall has been investigated. After modeling the steel-concrete composite shear wall and validating the numerical model with laboratory results, the effect of parameters such as the number of stiffeners, the type of arrangement, including vertical, horizontal, diagonal, and combined, on the maximum bearing capacity of the composite shear wall, ductility coefficient, additional strength, energy consumption, compressive damage of the concrete hardener, and failure modes have been investigated. The results of this research show that the use of T-shaped steel stiffeners and their arrangement have a significant effect on the bearing capacity of steel-concrete composite shear walls and cause the overall buckling of the steel sheet to become local buckling between the stiffeners. The use of diagonal stiffeners increases the capacity of steel shear walls by 25%. The ductility factor and added strength factor of the steel frame with diagonal stiffeners are about 39 and 124% higher than the ductility factor and added strength factor of the base sample without the use of stiffeners, respectively. The use of diagonal stiffeners in composite shear walls compared to composite shear walls without steel stiffeners increases energy consumption by about 18%. The use of T-shaped steel diagonal stiffeners in composite shear walls compared to composite shear walls without steel stiffeners causes a significant reduction in the damage and failure of the concrete stiffener.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Composite shear wall
T-shaped steel stiffener
concrete stiffener
finite element method
[1] A. Rahai and F. Hatami, (2009) "Evaluation of composite shear wall behavior under cyclic loadings", Journal of Constructional steel Research, 65 PP 1528-1539.
[2] Rahimi, T. Kheyroddin, A. and Gholhaki, M. 2020. An Analytical and Numerical Study on Effect of Thickness and Concrete Type of Panels on Behavior of Composite Steel Plate Shear Walls, Amirkabir J. Civil Eng, 53, pp 3623-3648.(In Persian).
http://dx.doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2020.17929.6713
[3] S. Momeni, N. Siahpolo and A. Jahanpour, (2024) "Numerical study on semi-supported steel composite shear wall at the edges under near and far-fault loading", Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, Accepted Manuscript Available Online from 20 June 2024. 10.24200/j30.2023.62420.3223
[4] Astaneh-Asl A. Seismic behavior and design of composite steel plate shear walls. Structural Steel Educational Council, USA: 2002.
[5] S. Sabouri Lateral Load Resisting Systems An Introduction To Steel Shear Walls. Anguizeh Poblishing Co, 1th Edn, (2001) 220-227.
[6] A. Astaneh-Asl, (2001) "Seismic behavior and design of steel shear walls", Steel Tips report, Structural steel educational council, Moraga CA.
[7] Q. Zhao, A. Astaneh-Asl, Seismic behavior of composite shear wall systems and application of smart structures technology, Steel Structures, 7 (2007) 69-75.
[8] AISC 341-10. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, (ANSI/AISC 341-10) 2010.
[9] Fathy E. Seismic assessment of thin steel plate shear walls with outrigger system. Struct Eng Mech 2020;74:267–82.
[10] F. Hatami, A. Rahaei, Behavior of composite shear walls under seismic loading, Journal of Sharif University of Technology, No. 46, pp 21-31. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117263
[11] S. Shafaei, A. Ayazi and F. Farahbod, (2015) "The effect of concrete panel thickness upon composite steel plate shear walls", Journal of constructional steel research, 117 PP 81-90.
[12] R. Rahnavard, A. Hassanipour and A. Mounesi, (2016) "Numerical study on important parameters of composite steel-concrete shear walls", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 121PP 441-456.
[13] Zhang Y, Song Y, Zhu G, Jiang Z. Hysteretic performance and shear deformation of external ring- stiffened joint between composite CFST column and steel beam. Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal Build Struct 2020;41:154–64. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.0131.
[14] Zhou, J., Fang, X., Jiang, Y., (2021). Cyclic behavior of concrete‐encased high‐strength concrete‐filled steel tube composite walls: An experiment. Structural Concrete. 22 (2), pp. 691-708.
[15] Seyed Kolbadi, S. M., Hassani, N., Seyed-Kolbadi, S. M., Mirtaheri, M., (2021). Analyzing parametric sensitivity on the cyclic behavior of steel shear walls. Shock and Vibration. 2021 pp. 1-10.
[16] Usefvand, M., Maleki, A., Alinejad, B., (2022). An innovative system of coupled steel plate shear wall with pin FUSE in link beam: Cyclic behavior and energy dissipation. Advances in Structural Engineering. 25 (3), pp. 473-490.
[17] Bypour, M., Yekrangnia, M., Kioumarsi, M., (2024). Predicting the shear capacity of composite steel plate shear wall with the application of RSM. Engineering Structures. Volume 301, 15 February 2024, 117263.
[18] J. Guang Yu, et al, (2018) "Cyclic performance of cross restrained steel plate shear walls with transverse braces", Journal Thin-Walled Structures, Volume 132, November 2018, Pages 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.08.020
[19] W. Wang, et al, (2018) " Experimental study on seismic behavior of steel plate reinforced concrete composite shear wall", Journal Engineering Structures, Volume 160, 1 April 2018, Pages 281-292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.08.020
[20]قلهکی و همکاران، (1396)، "اثر آرایش‌های مختلف سخت کننده در سختی و ظرفیت برشی دیوارهای برشی فولادی"، نشریه مهندسی عمران شریف، دوره2-33، شماره2/4، سال1397، صفحات 3 تا 12.
[21] H. Zhang, J. Dong, Y. Duan, X. Lu, J. Peng, Seismic and power generation performance of U-shaped steel connected PV-shear wall under lateral cyclic loading, Int. J. Photoenergy (2014) 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/362638, 2014.