کنترل نیمه فعال فازی سازه های مجاور متصل شده با میراگر سیال مغناطیسی تحت زلزله های حوزه دور و نزدیک

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل (کامل)

نویسندگان
محسن بهمئی
سیدمهدی زهرایی
دانشگاه تهران
10.22034/22.6.95
چکیده
خرابی­های ناشی از برخورد سازه های مجاور در زلزله های بزرگ گذشته ، اهمیت سیستم های کنترل سازه را برای کاهش خطر لرزه ای ناشی از برخورد سازه ها نشان داده­ است. اتصال ساختمان ­های مجاور با دستگاه­های اتلاف انرژی، یک رویکرد عملی و موثر برای جلوگیری از برخورد و همچنین کاهش پاسخ­های لرزه ای سازه­ها است و این موضوع در سال­های اخیر، یک زمینه تحقیقاتی مدنظر بوده است. در این مطالعه، جهت شناخت عملکرد میراگر سیال­ مغناطیسی با استفاده از سیستم­ کنترل فازی، سازه های معیار سه و نه طبقه تحت تحریک لرزه ای دو زلزله حوزه نزدیک و دو زلزله حوزه دور با بیشینه شتاب های 0.1g تا 1g مورد بررسی قرار می­گیرند. میراگر سیال مغناطیسی در تراز طبقه سوم دو سازه متصل شده است و ظرفیت تولید نیروی کنترلی معادل 1000 کیلونیوتن را دارد. سیستم فازی بر اساس جابجایی طبقه سوم دو سازه با هدف کاهش خطر برخورد سازه­ها و همچنین کاهش پاسخ­های لرزه­ای طراحی شده است. بصورت کلی سیستم کنترلی طراحی­شده تحت زلزله­های حوزه دور در مقایسه با زلزله­های حوزه نزدیک، عملکرد مناسب­تری در کاهش پاسخ­های دو سازه از خود نشان داده است و از دیدگاه کاهش احتمال برخورد سازه­ها، سیستم فازی مورد استفاده تحت زلزله­های حوزه دور نسبت به حوزه نزدیک، 71/9درصد عملکرد بهتری از خود نشان داده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Fuzzy Semi-active Control of Adjacent Buildings Connected with MR Dampers Under Far and Near-field Earthquakes

نویسندگان English

m. bahmaei
S.M. Zahrai
university of tehran
چکیده English

Damages caused by the impact of adjacent structures in past major earthquakes have shown the importance of structural control systems to reduce the seismic risk of the impact of structures. Connecting energy dissipation devices to adjacent buildings is a practical and effective approach to prevent collisions as well as reduce the seismic responses of structures, and this issue has been an active research field in recent years. One of the semi-active control methods is the use of MR dampers. These dampers use a magnetic fluid that produces large damping forces in a piston-cylinder system that can be controlled instantly by changing the applied voltage to the damper. The Bouc-wen model has been used to take advantage of the unique properties of MR damper as well as to consider its inherent nonlinear behavior. In this study, to evaluate the performance of MR dampers using a fuzzy control system, three- and nine-story standard structures under seismic excitation of two near-field earthquakes including Kobe (1995) and Northridge (1994) and two far-field earthquakes including El centro (1940) and Kern county (1952) with maximum accelerations of 0.1g to 1g are investigated.

The MR damper is connected to the third floor level of the two structures and can produce a controlled force equivalent to 1000 kN. The fuzzy system is designed based on the displacement of the third floor of two structures to reduce the risk of collision of structures as well as reduce seismic responses. the benchmark buildings have been modeled in OpenSees and the fuzzy control system was implemented in MATLAB software. The displacement responses of the third floor of structures are considered as the input value of the fuzzy system and the required voltage of MR damper is considered as the output value of the fuzzy system. In addition, triangular membership functions have been used to determine the degree of membership of input values.

In general, the control system designed under far-field earthquakes has shown better performance in reducing the responses of two structures compared to near-field earthquakes. According to the results obtained from the dynamical analysis, the fuzzy system used under far-field earthquakes compared to near-field earthquakes and based on evaluation criteria of J1 (maximum roof displacement), J2 (maximum roof acceleration), J3 (maximum Base shear) and J4 (maximum relative displacement of floors) in three-story building 17.35, 4.94, 3.58, 12.17% and in nine-story building 7.93, 7.05, 0.67, 9.13% showed better performance, respectively. Also, according to the evaluation criterion of J5, which is related to the minimum required gap between two buildings, the fuzzy system used under far-field earthquakes has shown 9.71% better performance than near-field earthquakes.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Vibration Control
Semi-active control
MR damper
Fuzzy Control Systems
adjacent buildings
[1] W. L. Qu and Y. L. Xu, “Semi-active control of seismic response of tall buildings with podium structure using ER/MR dampers,” Wiley Online Libr., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 179–192, Sep. 2001.
[2] Y. Ni, H. Liu,J. K. M. 2002, “Experimental investigation on seismic response control of adjacent buildings using semi-active MR dampers,” spiedigitallibrary.org.
[3] S. Bharti, S. Dumne, M. Shrimali. 2010, “Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers,” Elsevier.
[4] M. Shahidzade,H. Tarzi. 2011, “Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy control of adjacent structures using MR dampers,” ui.adsabs.harvard.edu.
[5] G. C. Kim and J. W. Kang, “Seismic response control of adjacent building by using hybrid control algorithm of MR damper,” Procedia Eng., vol. 14, pp. 1013–1020, 2011.
[6] G. B. Motra, W. Mallik, and N. K. Chandiramani, “Semi-active vibration control of connected buildings using magnetorheological dampers,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 1811–1827, 2011.
[7] M. E. Uz and M. N. S. Hadi, “Optimal design of semi active control for adjacent buildings connected by MR damper based on integrated fuzzy logic and multi-objective genetic algorithm,” Eng. Struct., vol. 69, pp. 135–148, Jun. 2014.
[8] M. K. Shrimali, S. D. Bharti, and S. M. Dumne, “Seismic response analysis of coupled building involving MR damper and elastomeric base isolation,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 457–470, Jun. 2015.
[9] M. Abdeddaim, A. Ounis, S. D. Bharti, and M. K. Shrimali, “Seismic retrofitting using the concept of coupling two adjacent buildings,” in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 12, Springer, 2019, pp. 355–363.
[10] O. A. S. Al-Fahdawi, L. R. Barroso, and R. W. Soares, “Utilizing the Adaptive Control in Mitigating the Seismic Response of Adjacent Buildings Connected with MR Dampers,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2018, vol. 2018-June, pp. 912–917.
[11] M. Azimi and A. M. Yeznabad, “Swarm-based parallel control of adjacent irregular buildings considering soil-structure interaction,” J. Sens. Actuator Networks, vol. 9, no. 2, Jun. 2020.
[12] O. Yoshida and S. J. Dyke, “Seismic Control of a Nonlinear Benchmark Building Using Smart Dampers,” J. Eng. Mech., vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 386–392, 2004.
[13] S. Y. Ok, D. S. Kim, K. S. Park, and H. M. Koh, “Semi-active fuzzy control of cable-stayed bridges using magneto-rheological dampers,” Eng. Struct., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 776–788, 2007.
[14] M. Abdeddaim, A. Ounis, N. Djedoui, and M. K. Shrimali, “Reduction of pounding between buildings using fuzzy controller,” Asian J. Civ. Eng., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 985–1005, 2016.
مهندسی عمران مدرس
دوره 22، شماره 6
آذر و دی 1401
صفحه 95-108