ارزیابی مبتنی بر عملکرد برای هسته های بتن مسلح با ترازهای مختلف یک مهار بازویی کمانش تاب تحت نگاشت حوزه نزدیک و دور

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل (کامل)

نویسنده
دانشگاه دامغان
چکیده
از جمله مزایای ساختمان های بلند با هسته بتن مسلح می توان به هزینه ساخت کمتر، سرعت احداث بیشتر و امکان ایجاد معماری داخلی با فضای باز وسیع تر در مقایسه با سایر سیستمهای سازه ای بلند مرتبه اشاره کرد. با افزایش ارتفاع ساختمان، کنترل جابجایی جانبی این سازه ها در برابر بارهای لرزه ای با چالش روبرو میشود. بکارگیری مهار بازویی در سازه دارای هسته از راهکارهای مورد استقبال است.در این مقاله ابتدا سازه های بلند دارای هسته بتن مسلح با و بدون مهار بازویی تحلیل و طراحی می شود. مهار بازویی دارای مهاربندهای از نوع کمانش تاب بوده و اثر موقعیت آن در چند تراز مختلف مورد بررسی قرار میگیرد. در ادامه، مدلسازی هسته به کمک المانهای فیبری با رفتار غیر خطی برای دیوار و مهار بازویی انجام میشود و تحت اثر شتاب نگاشت های نزدیک گسل دارای پالس سرعت و دور از گسل قرار می گیرند و رفتار سازه شامل نمودارهای جابجایی نسبی بین طبقه ای، جابجایی جانبی، لنگر و برش بررسی می شود. نتایج نشان میدهد کمترین مقدار جابجایی جانبی نسبی بین طبقه ای مربوط به قرارگیری مهار بازویی در تراز 0.75 کل ارتفاع از تراز پایه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Performance based Evaluation of the BRB outrigger in reinforced concrete cores under near-field event

نویسنده English

Hamid Beiraghi
Damgan University
چکیده English

Advantages of high-rise buildings with reinforced concrete cores include lower construction costs, higher construction speeds, and the possibility of creating a wider outdoor architecture compared to other high-rise structural systems. As the height of the building increases, the control of lateral displacement of these structures against seismic loads is challenged. The use of arm restraint in structures with cores is one of the welcomed solutions. In this article, first, tall structures with reinforced concrete cores with and without arm restraints are analyzed and designed. The arm restraint has a buckling type brace and the effect of its position on several different levels is investigated. Next, the core modeling is performed with the help of fiber elements with nonlinear behavior for the wall and arm restraint in software. Interclass relative, lateral displacement, anchor and shear are investigated. The results show that the lowest amount of relative lateral displacement between classes is related to the placement of the arm restraint at the level of 0.75 total height from the base level. Advantages of high-rise buildings with reinforced concrete cores include lower construction costs, higher construction speeds, and the possibility of creating a wider outdoor architecture compared to other high-rise structural systems. As the height of the building increases, the control of lateral displacement of these structures against seismic loads is challenged. The use of arm restraint in structures with cores is one of the welcomed solutions. In this article, first, tall structures with reinforced concrete cores with and without arm restraints are analyzed and designed. The arm restraint has a buckling type brace and the effect of its position on several different levels is investigated. Next, the core modeling is performed with the help of fiber elements with nonlinear behavior for the wall and arm restraint in software. Interclass relative, lateral displacement, anchor and shear are investigated. The results show that the lowest amount of relative lateral displacement between classes is related to the placement of the arm restraint at the level of 0.75 total height from the base level. Advantages of high-rise buildings with reinforced concrete cores include lower construction costs, higher construction speeds, and the possibility of creating a wider outdoor architecture compared to other high-rise structural systems. As the height of the building increases, the control of lateral displacement of these structures against seismic loads is challenged. The use of arm restraint in structures with cores is one of the welcomed solutions. In this article, first, tall structures with reinforced concrete cores with and without arm restraints are analyzed and designed. The arm restraint has a buckling type brace and the effect of its position on several different levels is investigated. Next, the core modeling is performed with the help of fiber elements with nonlinear behavior for the wall and arm restraint in PERFORM-3D software. Interclass relative, lateral displacement, anchor and shear are investigated. The results show that the lowest amount of relative lateral displacement between classes is related to the placement of the arm restraint at the level of 0.75 total height from the base level.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

tall building
concrete
BRB
[1]. Klemencic, R., "Performance based seismic design—rising," Structural Magazine, 10–13, 2008. structuremag.org/article.aspxarticleID=707.
[2]. Klemencic, R., Fry, A., Hooper, JD., and Morgen, BG., "Performance based design of ductile concrete core wall buildings— issues to consider before detail analysis," Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2007.
[3]. Uniform Building Code UBC-1997, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California, USA, 1997.
[4] ASCE/SEI 7-2010, 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA.
[6]. Chopra, AK., "Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (3rd edn)," Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2007.
[7] Munir, A., And Warnitchai, P., "The Cause Of Unproportionately Large Higher Mode Contributions In The Inelastic Seismic Responses Of High-Rise Core-Wall Buildings," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41:2195–2214, 2012.
[8] Smith BS, Coull A. Tall building Structures: Analysis and Design (1 ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1991.
[9] Soong TT, Spencer BF. Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures 2002; 24 (3): 243–259.
[10] Satake N, Suda K, Arakawa T, Sasaki A, Tamura Y. Damping evaluation using full-scale data of buildings in Japan. Jurnal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129 (4): 470–477.
[11] Smith RJ, Willford MR. The damped outrigger concept for tall buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 2007; 16 (4): 501–517.
[12] Chen Y, McFarland DM, Wang Z, Spencer BF, Bergman, LA. Analysis of Tall Buildings with Damped Outriggers. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL NGINEERING 2010; 136(11): 1435-1443
[13] Taranath, BS. Structural Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings. New York, Mc Graw Hill, 1988.
[14] Taranath BS. Optimum belt truss location for high rise structures. Engineering Journal 1974; 18-21.
[15]. CEN EC8, "Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance," European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
[16]. NZS 3101, New Zealand Standard, Part 1—The Design of Concrete Structures. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
[17]. CSA Standard A23.3-04, "Design of Concrete Structures," Canadian Standard Association: Rexdale, Canada, 2005, 214.
[18]. Paulay, T., and Priestley, MJN., "Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings," Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 1992.
[19]. Panagiotou, M., Restrepo, JI., and Conte, JP., "Shake table test of a 7-story full scale reinforced concrete structural wall building slice phase I: rectangular wall," SSRP 07-07 Report, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego, 2007.
[20]. ACI 318-08, (2008). “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and
Commentary,” American Concrete Institute Committee 318.
[22]Uriz P, Mahin SA, “Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures”, PEER 2008/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2008.
[23]Beiraghi H, Kheyroddin A, Kafi MA, “Effect of record scaling on the behavior of reinforced concrete core-wall buildings subjected to near-fault and far-fault earthquakes”, Scientia Iranica article in press.
[24]Beiraghi H, Siahpolo N, “Seismic assessment of RC core-wall building capable of three plastic hinges with outrigger”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. Article first published online, 2016, DOI: 10.1002/tal.1306.
[25]Beiraghi H, Siahpolo N, “Seismic assessment of RC core-wall building capable of three plastic hinges with outrigger”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. Article first published online, 2016, DOI: 10.1002/tal.1306.
[26]Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA. “Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity”, Seismological Research Letters, 1997, 68:199-222.
[27] Bertero V, Mahin S, Herrera R. 1978. A seismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 6(1):31–42.
[28] Baker JW. 2007. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 97(5):1486–1501.
[29] Vafaei D, Eskandari R. 2014. Seismic response of mega buckling-restrained braces subjected to fling-tep and forward-directivity near-fault ground motions. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. DOI: 10.1002/tal.1205.
[30] Beiraghi H, Kheyroddin A, Kafi MA. 2016. Forward directivity near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on the behavior of reinforced concrete wall tall buildings with one and more plastic hinges. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 25(11): 519–539.
[31] Beiraghi H, Kheyroddin A, Kafi MA. 2016c. Effect of record scaling on the behavior of reinforced concrete core-wall buildings subjected to near-fault and far-fault earthquakes. Scientia Iranica . article in press.
[32] Beiraghi H. Forward directivity near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on the responses of tall reinforced concrete walls with buckling-restrained brace outriggers, Scientia Iranica. article in press.

[33]. ETABS Nonlinear Version 9.2.0 (2008), Extended 3D Analysis of Building Structures, Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, CA.24 peer.
[34] ACI 318-11, 2011. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills.
[35] ASCE/SEI 7-2010, 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA.
[36] AISC 2010. Seismic Provision for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, 2005.
[37] National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2012. Seismic design of cast-in-place concrete special structural walls and coupling beams, NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 6 2012.
[38] EMA P695, 2009. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (ATC-63 Project). Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
[39]. Data source: PEER (http://peer.berkeley. edu/smcat);
[40]. Computer and Structures, Inc, Perform-3D V5: Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures, Berkeley, CA, 2011.

[41]. Powell, G., "Detailed example of a tall shear wall building using CSI’s Perform 3D nonlinear dynamic analysis," Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures Inc, 2007.
[42]. Wallace, J.W., "Modeling issues for tall reinforced concrete core wall buildings," The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16, 615-632, 2007.
[43]. Orakcal, K., and Wallace, J., "Flexural modeling of reinforced concrete walls – experimental verification", ACI Structural Journal, 103 (2), 196-206, 2006.
[44]. Ghodsi, T., and Ruiz, J.F., "Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research/Seismic Safety Commission tall building design case study 2," The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19 (1-2), 197-256, 2010.
[45]. LATBSDC, 2011. An Alternative Procedure For Seismic Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings Located in the Los Angeles Region. Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council.
[46]. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R., "Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete", ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804-1826, 1988.
[47]. Applied Technology CouncilATC-72: "Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings," ATC, Redwood City, CA, 2010.
[49].Jones P, Zareian F. Seismic response of a 40-storey buckling-restrained braced frame designed for the Los Angeles region. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2013; 22 (3): 291–299. DOI: 10.1002/tal.687.
[50]. Ghorbanirenani I, Tremblay R, Léger P, Leclerc M. 2012. Shake table testing of slender rc shear walls subjected to eastern north america seismic ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering. 138(12):1515-1529.
[51]. Rodr´ıguez, ME., Restrepo, JI., and Carr, AJ., "Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:693–718.
[52]. Panneton, M,. L´eger, P., and Tremblay, R., "Inelastic analysis of a reinforced concrete shear wall building according to the national building code of Canada 2005," Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2006; 33:854–871, 2006.
[53]. Priestley, MJN., Calvi, GM., and Kowalsky, MJ., "Displacement Based Seismic Design of Structures," IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2007.
[54]. ASCE/SEI 41-13, 2013. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (Including Supplement # 1). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.