ارزیابی لرزه ای رفتار برج آبگیر استوانه ای تحت اثر زلزله های میدان دور و نزدیک با در نظر گرفتن طوقه های بتنی و اندرکنش آب - سازه

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل (کامل)

نویسندگان
احسان تیموری
سعید عباسی
دانشگاه زنجان
چکیده
در این مطالعه به بررسی اثرات طوقه­های بتنی و نیز زلزله میدان دور و نزدیک بر رفتار فرکانسی و لرزه­ای برج آبگیر پرداخته شده است. برای مدلسازی و آنالیز با درنظرگرفتن اندرکنش آب و سازه، از نرم­افزار ANSYS که مبتنی بر روش اجزای محدود می­باشد استفاده شده است. برای آنالیز بهتر این مدل­ها دو زلزله میدان دور و نزدیک انتخاب شده و به یک شتاب یکسان مقیاس شده­اند. در ادامه 66 آنالیز برای سه حالت برج اعم از فقط سازه­ی برج آبگیر بدون مخزن، برج آبگیر با مخزن پیرامونی و داخل برج خالی و برج آبگیر با مخزن پیرامونی و داخل برج پر انجام گرفته است. نتایج حاصل از تغییرمکان، تنش و عکس العمل تکیه­گاهی برج آبگیر تحت آنالیزهای مربوطه با یکدیگر مقایسه شده است. با توجه به نتایج بدست آمده مشخص گردید که اثرات زلزله میدان نزدیک در ماکزیمم تغییرمکان­، تنش و عکس­العمل تکیه­گاهی به مراتب بیش­تر از زلزله میدان دور می­باشد با این وجود مقادیر پاسخ­ها به محتوای فرکانسی زلزله علاوه بر میدان نزدیک بودن آن بستگی دارد. همچین نتایج نشان داد که افزودن طوقه­های بتنی در تراز­های بالا و نزدیک به هم اثرات خیلی خوب و مثبتی داشته و باعث کاهش مقادیر ماکزیمم تنش­ها، عکس­العمل تکیه­گاهی، تغییرمکان­ها و نیز تغییرمکان نسبی می­گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Seismic evaluation of the behavior of cylindrical intake tower under the effects of the far and near-field earthquakes by considering concrete rings and water-structure interaction

نویسندگان English

ehsan teymouri
Saeed Abbasi
university of Zanjan
چکیده English

In this study, the effects of the concrete rings as well as the far and near field earthquake on the frequency and seismic behavior of the intake tower have been investigated. For modeling and analysis with considering the interaction of water and structure, ANSYS software which is based on the finite element method is used. For a better analysis of these models, two far and near field earthquakes have been selected and scaled to the same maximum value acceleration. To evaluate the effects of concrete rings on the behavior of the intake tower, 33 intake tower models have been modeled by considering concrete rings in different numbers and height levels. In the following, 66 analyzes have been performed for three modes of the tower, including only the structure of the intake tower without a reservoir, the intake tower with the surrounding reservoir and without inside water, and the intake tower with the surrounding reservoir and inside of the tower is full. The results of displacement, stress, and base reactions of the intake tower under the relevant analyzes have been compared with each other. Based on the results, it was found that the effects of a near-field earthquake at maximum displacements and stresses are far greater than a far-field earthquake. However, the values of the responses depend on the frequency of the earthquake in addition to its proximity to the field. The results also showed that surrounding water and internal water have different effects on the seismic response of intake towers affected by near and far-field earthquakes. The presence of water increases the effective duration of the earthquake on the response of the intake tower, especially in the near field earthquake. The results showed that by adding circular rings, the frequencies of the intake towers undergo significant changes, which require seismic analysis to evaluate its effects. In the case of an intake tower without a surrounding reservoir and an intake tower with a surrounding reservoir and without inside water, the maximum values of displacement decrease with increasing the height of the concrete rings and decreasing the distance between them. For an intake tower with a surrounding reservoir and full inside, in the case of far-field earthquake analysis, the greatest reduction in displacement occurs for an intake tower with a ring at 25 meters, while for a near field earthquake, in this case, the amount of displacement is further reduced with an increasing height level of concrete rings. The pattern of changes in the first principal stresses for all the studied models is also in accordance with the changes in the values of the maximum displacement. The maximum values of the base reaction for the intake tower without surrounding reservoir and the intake tower with the surrounding reservoir and without inside water for near field earthquake are greater than for the far-field earthquake while for the intake tower with surrounding reservoir and full inside for far-field earthquake it is more than a near field earthquake which is due to the frequency content of the desired earthquakes. Eventually, the results showed that adding concrete platforms at high and close to each other has very good and positive effects also reduces the maximum values of stress, base reaction, displacement, and relative displacement.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Intake tower
Concrete ring
finite element method
Water-Structure interaction
Far-Field and Near-Field Earthquake
1. A. Goyal, A. K. Chopra,” Simplified evaluation of added hydrodynamic mass for intake towers”, Proceedings of ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1989,Vol.115, No.7, pp.1393-1412.
2. A. Goyal, A. K. Chopra,” Earthquake analysis of intake–outlet towers including tower–water–foundation–soil interaction”, 1989,Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 325-334.
3. W. E. Daniell, C. A. Taylor,” Full-scale dynamic testing and analysis of a reservoir intake tower”, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 1994, Vol. 23, No. 11,pp. 1219-1237.
4. W. E. Daniell, C. A. Taylor,” Developing a numerical model for a UK intake tower seismic assessment”, P. I. Civil Eng-water, 2003,Vol. 56, No. 01, pp. 63-72.
5. Zh. Xaoxi, W. Zongmin,” The application of ANSYS software to the static and dynamic stress analysis of high intake tower”, Water power,2005, Vol. 31, No. 3,pp. 72-83.
6. M. A. Millan, Y. L. Young, andJ. H. Prevost,” Seismic Response of Intake Towers Including Dam – Tower Interaction”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2009, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 307-329.
7. CH. Gong, A. L. Huaw, J. Zhang,” Study on Dynamic Properties of the Intake Tower with Finite Element Method”, Applied Mechanics and Materials,2014, Vol. 501, pp. 1888-1891.
8. Y. X. Jiang, J. C. Yue, and L. M. Ye,” Static and dynamic analysis of intake tower structure”, Appl Mech Mater,2014, Vol.445, pp. 912-915.
9. A. Goyal, A. K. Chopra,” Hydrodynamic and foundation interaction effects in dynamics of intake towers: frequency response functions”, J Struct Eng, 1989, Vol. 115, No. 6, pp. 1371-1385.
10. A. Goyal, A. K. Chopra,” Hydrodynamic and foundation interaction effects in dynamic of intake towers: earthquake responses”, J. Struct. Eng,1989, Vol. 115, No. 6, pp.1386-1395.
11. A. Goyal, A. K. Chopra,” Earthquake response spectrum analysis of intake–outlet towers”, J Eng Mech,1989, Vol.115, No. 7, pp. 1413-1433.
12. H. Shariatmadar, A. MirHaj,”Modeling of intake‌ tower-reservoir-foundation interaction subjected to earthquake” Journal of modeling in Engineering, Vol.3, No.18, pp. 67-80.
13. S .Abdolrahimi, A.J. Moradloo,”Nonlinear analysis of intake tower with considering water-structure interaction” Third International Conference of earthquake and structures, Kerman, October 2012.
14. M. Alembagheri,” Dynamics of submerged intake towers including interaction with dam and foundation”, M. Alembagheri,” Dynamics of submerged intake towers including interaction with dam and foundation”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, Vol. 84, pp. 108–119.
15. M. Alembagheri,” Frequency domain analysis of submerged tower-dam dynamic interacton”, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2017, Vol. 54, No.4, pp. 264-275.
16. M. Alembagheri”, Earthquake response of solitary slender freestanding intake towers”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, Vol. 90, pp. 1-14.
17. A.A.Arjomandi, H. Kalantari,” Evaluate patterns of crack growth and spread in Ohkura arch dam and intake tower connected to it under earthquake” International Conference on Architecture, Urbanism, Civil Engineering, Art, Enviroment Future Horizons and Retrospect,Tehran, Iran, 7 March2016.
18. P. Prihadi, M. Alembagheri,” The influence of bridge–tower interaction on the dynamic behavior of intake–outlet towers”, SN Applied Sciences, No 16, 2019.
19. SH. Zhang, G. Wang,” Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 2013, Vol. 53, pp. 217-229
20. G. P. Mavroeidis, A. S. Papageorgiou,” A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions”,2003, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 1099-1131.
21. G. Q. Wang, X. Y. Zhou, P. Z. Zhang, and H. Igel,” Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near-fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2002, Vol. 22, No.1, pp. 73-96.
22. P. G. Somerville,” Magnitude scaling of the near-fault rupture directivity pulse,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,2003, Vol. 137, No. 1, 2001-2012.
23. J. D. Bray, R. A. Marekb,” Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 815-828.
24. W. I. Liao, CH. Loh, and BH. Lee,” Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and nonisolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions”, Engineering Structures, 2004, Vol. 26, No. 14, pp. 2173-2183.
25. M. D. Trifunac,” The role of strong motion rotations in the response of structures
near earthquake faults”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2009, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 382-393.
26. CH. A. Maniatakis, I. M. Taflampas, and C. C. Spyrakos,” Identification of Near-Fault
Earthquake Record Characteristics”, 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering ,Beijing, China, 12-17 October, 2008.
27. M.R.Ghayamghamian, B. Khalili,” The effects of fault local parameters
and site geometry on near-fault pulse characteristics, Journal of Faculty of
Engineering (Tehran Univ.), Vol. 42 , No. 4.
28. M. Akköse, E. Şimşek,” Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water-sediment-foundation interaction”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010, Vol. 34, No. 11, pp.3685-3700.
29. A. Bayraktar, A. C. Altunışık, B. Sevim, M. E. Kartal, and T. Türker,” Near-fault ground motion effects on the nonlinear response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems”, Structural Engineering and& Mechanics, 2008, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 411-442.
30. A. Bayraktar, B. Sevim, A. C. Altunışık, et al," Comparison of near and far fault ground motion effects on the seismic performance evaluation of damreservoir-foundation systems”, International Water Power and Dam Construction, 2009, Vol. 19, No. 4, Pp.301-239.
31. A. Bayraktar, A. C. Altunışık, B. Sevim, M. E. Kartal, T. Türker, and Y. Bilici,” Comparison of near-and far-fault ground motion effect on the nonlinear response of dam– reservoir–foundation systems”, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2009, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp.655-673.
32. A. Bayraktar, T. Türker, M. Akköse, and Ş. Ateş,” The effect of reservoir length on seismic performance of gravity dams to near- and far-fault ground motions” Natural Hazards,2004, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 257-275.
33. J. HajHoseyni, J.Moradlou,” Comparison of Near‐Filed and Far‐Filed Earthquakes on Nonlinear Response of Concrete Gravity Dams”, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering,2015, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp.25-38.
34. M. Karabulut, M. E. Kartal, O. F. Capar, and M. Cavusli,” Earthquake Analysis of Concrete Arch Dams Considering Elastic Foundation Effects”, DISASTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, Vol. 2. No. 2, pp. 46-52.
35. F. Naeim, The Seismic Design Handbook, 2th ed, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
مهندسی عمران مدرس
دوره 21، شماره 3
خرداد و تیر 1400
صفحه 61-73