بررسی عددی عملکرد داخل صفحه دیوارهای بنایی تقویت شده با مصالح مرکب پایه سیمانی مهندسی با تاکید بر تاثیر اتصال به شالوده

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل (کامل)

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود
2 دانشیار دانشکده مهندسی عمران دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود
3 استادیار بخش سازه مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهرسازی
چکیده
وسعت احداث سازه‌های بنایی و ضعف آنها در برابر زلزله، ضرورت تحقیق راجع به روش‌های نوین بهسازی لرزه‌ای این سازه‌ها را دو چندان می‌نماید. اخیرا در کنار روش‌های متداولی چون مش و شاتکریت و الیاف پلیمری، مصالح مرکب پایه سیمانی مهندسی ECC جهت تقویت دیوارهای بنایی مورد توجه محققین قرار گرفته‌است. وجه تمایز این نوع مصالح نوین، شکل‌پذیری بالا در کشش می‌باشد. در تحقیق حاضر تاثیر این مصالح روی عملکرد دیوارهای باربر بنایی با مودهای شکست داخل صفحه بصورت عددی بررسی شده‌است. نتایج تحقیق مبتنی بر روش عددی می‌باشد که جهت صحت‌سنجی مدل از اطلاعات موجود آزمایشگاهی استفاده شده‌است. روش تقویت به صورت یک و دو طرفه درنظر گرفته شده‌است. همچنین لایه تقویت به دو صورت متصل و جدای از شالوده زیر دیوار باربر مدل شده‌است. تغییر مود شکست دیوار تقویت شده از حالت ترد به شکل پذیر همراه با رفتار سخت‌شوندگی در ناحیه غیرخطی از نتایج مشترک مدل‌ها می‌باشد. افزایش مقاومت و جذب انرژی از دیگر نتایج تحقیق می‌باشد که مقدار آن بسته به چگونگی اتصال لایه تقویت به شالوده متغییر است. در شرایطی که بین لایه تقویت و شالوده اتصال برقرار گردد مقاومت برای حالت تقویت یک و دو طرفه به ترتیب ۳.۵ و ۶ برابر دیوار تقویت نشده می‌باشد. این مقدار در جذب انرژی به ترتیب ۳ و ۶.۵ بدست آمده‌است. همچنین تاثیر اتصال لایه تقویت با شالوده در بهبود رفتار دیوارهای با مود شکست لغزش درز ملات به مقدار محسوسی از دیوارهای با مود شکست قطری بیشتر می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Numerical Investigation of the In-plane Masonry Walls Performance, Strengthened Using ECC Materials, Focusing on the Effect of the Connection to the Foundation

نویسندگان English

alireza namayandeh Niasar 1
Farshid Jandaghi Alaee 2
Sohail Majid Zamani 3
1 PHD Candidate, Structural, Civil Eng. Dept., Shahrood University
2 Associate Prof., Civil Eng Dept., Shahrood University
3 Assistant Prof., Structural Engineering Dept., BHRC
چکیده English

The extent of masonry structures and their weaknesses against earthquakes will increase the need for research on new ways of seismic rehabilitation of these structures. Recently, in addition to conventional techniques such as Mesh, Shotcrete, and FRP, new materials such as ECC materials have been considered by the researchers to retrofit the masonry walls. The composite materials of cement base, which is one of the types of cement base materials, due to the presence of fibers in the matrix, has a significantly different tensile strain capacity than that of conventional concrete, so that the range of this parameter for a typical mortar is 0.015%, and for composite materials of ECC is from 0.5 up to 6%. In the present study, the effect of these materials on the performance of the bearing masonry walls with in-plane failure modes including the diagonal tension mode (brittle mode) and the bed-joint sliding mode (the ductile mode) were investigated. The results of the research are based on the numerical method. ABAQUS software was used for numerical modeling. Due to validate the model, the available laboratory information of as-built masonry walls has been used. The as-built masonry walls are half scale. The wall dimensions for diagonal tension mode and bed-joint sliding mode were 1900x1400x110 and 2700x1400x160 mm, respectively. The gravity load of the wall was 0.1 MP. The walls strengthened with 20 mm ECC layers on one and both sides. In one case, ECC layers were joint to the foundation and in other case were not. A change in failure mode of strengthened walls (brittle to ductile) and hardening behavior were the main achievement of this research. If the connection between ECC layers and the foundation is absent, the failure mode of strengthened walls will be toe-crushing and rocking mode. If the connection between ECC layers and the foundation is present, the failure mode of strengthened walls will be toe-crushing and bed-joint sliding mode. Other obtained results showed an effective increase in strength and dissipated energy. The extent of this increase depends on how ECC layer is connected to the foundation. If there is no connection between ECC layers and the foundation, the strength and dissipated energy of walls with diagonal tension failure mode for one-side and both-sides ECC layers will be 2.3 and 3 times, respectively, in comparison with those of as-built masonry walls. Whereas for the bed-joint sliding mode, the extent of wall strength and dissipated energy is 1.4 and 1.8. according to the obtained results and comparing the properties of the wall strengthened by one-side and both- sides ECC layers, a significant difference was not observed, especially in bed-joint sliding mode. Appositively, if there is a connection between ECC layers and the foundation, the strength of walls for one-side and both-sides ECC layers will be 3.5 and 6 times, respectively, in comparison with those of as-built masonry walls. Whereas the dissipated energy of walls will be 3 and 4.5 times. Based on these results, if the ECC layers and the wall foundation are connected, the capacity of strengthened walls will be optimized.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Bearing Masonry Wall
Engineering Composite Cementation
Numerical method
seismic rehabilitation
[1] ASCE standard, ASCE/SEI 41-13, American Society of Civil Engineers. “Seismic Evaluation
and Retrofit of Existing Buildings”. American Society of Civil Engineers.
[2] Sachin B. Kadam, Yogendra Singh, Bing Li, (2014),” Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Using Welded Wire Mesh and Micro-Concrete Behaviour Under In-Plane Action”. J of Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 247–257.
[3] Pablo Alcaino and Hernan Santa-Maria, (2008), “Experimental Response of Externally Retrofitted Masonry Walls Subjected to Shear Loading”, J of Composites for Construction © ASCE/ September/October 2008.
[4] Keith, Kesner and Sarah L.Billington, (2004), ”Tension, Compression and Cyclic Testing of Engineered Cementitious Composite Materials”, Technical Report MCEER-04-2002.
[5] Yi-Wei Lin, Liam Wotherspoon, Allan Scott, Jason M.Ingham, (2014), “In-Plane Strengthening of Clay Brick Unreinforced Masonry Wallettes”.J of Engineering Structures 66 (2014) 57–65.
[6] Mingke Deng, Shuo Yang,” Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted with engineered cementitious composites”,J of Construction and Building Materials 177 (2018) 395–408.
[7] Paulo B. Lourenco and Jan G. Rots, (1997), “Multi surface Interface Model for Analysis of Masonry Structures”. J of Engineering Mechanics / July 1997.
[8] Tong-Seak Han, Peter H.Feenstra, and Sarah L.Billington,”Simulation of Highly Ductile Fiber Reinforced Cement-Based Composite Components Under Cyclic Loading”, ACI Structural Journal, V.100, No.6.November-December 2003.
[9] Kim.Y, Kong H.J, Li.V, “Design of Engineered Cementitious Composite Suitable for Wet-Mixture Shotcreting”, ACI Mater J 2003;100(6):511–8.
[10] Pluijm, van der, R. (1997), “Non-linear Behaviour of Masonry under Tension”, Heron, 42(1), 25-54.
[11] A.Darbhanzi, M.S.Marefat, M. Khanmohammadi, “Investigation of In-Plane Seismic Retrofit of Unreinforced Masonry Walls by Means of Vertical Steel Ties. J of Construction and Building Materials 52 (2014) 122–129.
[12] Abaqus analysis user’s manual, 6.13-3. RI, USA: Dassault Systems Providence; 2013.