بررسی اثرات مفید و مخرب اندرکنش خاک و سازه با استناد به طیف خرابی

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه
2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه عمران-زلزله دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
پاسخ سیستم سازه با وجود اندرکنش خاک و سازه تابعی از عوامل مانند ابعاد سازه، خصوصیات دینامیکی سازه، پروفیل خاک و خصوصیات زلزله اعمالی است. پاسخ سیستم‌های اندرکنشی تحت بارگذاری لرزه‌ای عموما به صورت غیرخطی می‌باشد. اگر چه رفتار غیرخطی خاک و وجود برکنش، انرژی زیادی را در سطح مشترک بین خاک و سازه مستهلک می‌سازد و اثری مفید برای در نظر گرفتن اندرکنش خاک و سازه به شمار می‌آید، اما از طرفی ممکن است باعث تغییر شکل‌های ماندگار بیش از اندازه در سازه گردد و لذا این اثر مخرب نیز باید به صورت همزمان مدنظر قرار داده شود. در این مقاله به منظور بررسی اثرات مفید و مخرب اندرکنش خاک و سازه در حوزه رفتار غیرخطی خاک و سازه، مقایسه طیف خرابی سیستم با پای انعطاف پذیر و سیستم با پای ثابت بر اساس شاخص خرابی پارک و انگ برای سیستم‌های یک درجه آزادی ارائه می‌گردد. این سیستم‌های یک درجه آزادی دارای رفتار غیرخطی هستند که بر تیر با بستر غیر ارتجاعی وینکلر قرار دارند. طیف‌های خرابی برای چنین سیستم‌هایی با در نظر گرفتن سه زلزله ثبت شده بر خاک نرم و برای نسبت‌های مختلف لاغری در سازه، فرکانس بی‌بعد و شکل‌پذیری بدست می‌آیند. نتایج این مطالعه نشان می دهد که اگرچه در بسیاری از سازه‌ها اندرکنش خاک و سازه اثری مفید در کاهش نیاز لرزه‌ای اعمالی به سازه دارد، اما در برخی از حالات نسبت سختی سازه به خاک، اندرکنش خاک و سازه خسارت لرزه‌ای اعمالی را در سازه‌های با پریود کم و روی خاک نرم افزایش می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Beneficial and detrimental effects of soil-structure interaction according to damage spectrum

نویسنده English

Hamzeh Shakib 2
چکیده English

In spite of extensive studies since 1970 on Soil Structure Interaction (SSI), there is still controversy regarding the seismic performance of the structures rested on soft soil. SSI is known as a phenomenon influencing beneficial and sometimes detrimental effects on the response of structures. The response of soil–structure system depends basically on the size of the structure, its dynamic properties, and the soil profile as well as the applied excitation. Under strong shaking the response of soil–structure system is nonlinear and a combination of different types of nonlinearity as well as sliding, uplift and soil yielding will occur. Although foundation uplift in conjunction with soil yielding may dissipate energy during earthquakes, they may also lead to excessive permanent deformations in the structures.
In such case, soil- structure interaction (SSI) is not only beneficial, but also detrimental to the seismic response of the structures. In order to investigate the beneficial and detrimental effects of SSI on the nonlinear response of building, damage spectra on the basis of Park and Ang damage Index for the SDOF models are provided by considering and neglecting the SSI effects. The bilinear SDOF models are supported by Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation. Two non-dimensional parameters are used to control the modeling. (I) non-dimensional frequency a0 which is a statement of the structure-to-soil stiffness ratio (II) the aspect ratio of the structure h/r. The systems are subjected to three earthquake ground motions recorded on soft soil. For each period, first the yield strength demand of the structure is calculated by iteration in order to reach the specified target ductility in the fixed-base model within 1% of accuracy when subjected to the ground motions. The dissipated hysteretic energy in the structure is also calculated accordingly. Then, the ductility and the hysteretic energy demands are calculated for the soil–structure systems under different values of a0 and h/r subjected to the same ground motion providing the same yield strength for the structure. Consequently, the damage index is calculated for the structure in the fixed-base state as well as for the structure when located on soil. The result showed that for most of structures with long period SSI decrease the damage index. How ever It is observed that in some cases of structure to soil stiffness, SSI increases the damage index before a threshold period which is closely related to the predominant period of the ground motion. It means that the conventional fixed-base model underestimates the damages sustained by buildings having periods less than this threshold period. In particular, the SSI substantially increases the damage index of short-period buildings located on soft soils. It is also observed that increasing the aspect ratio of the structure increases this effect. However, the trend is reversed after the threshold period. it is observed that the increase in the slenderness ratio and ductility ratiob of structures leads to increase in the maximum damage.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Soil structure interaction
Damage index
Nonlinear behavior
Enrique Luco, J. "Bounds for natural frequencies, Dunkerley's formula and application to soil–structure interaction." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, (47), 2013, 32-37.
[2] Elnashai, S. A., and MCCLURE, C. D. "Effect of modelling assumptions and input motion characteristics on seismic design parameters of RC bridge piers", Wiley,Chichester, ROYAUME-UNI. 1996.
[3] Zeller, E. "NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures: Commentary”, DIANE Publishing Company,  2001.
[4]Moghaddasi,etal,"Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction Effects on Nonlinear Seismic Demands od Structures", NZSEE Confrence, 2010, Newzealand.
[5] Emadi, A., Shakib, H., and Shadlou, M. "Investigation of beneficial and detrimental effects  of soil-foundation- Structure interaction on the seismic response of shear buildings." KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(1), (2014),  253-263.
[6] Nakhaei M., Ghannad M.A., "The effect of Soil-Structure interaction on damage index of buildings", Engineering Structures, (30), 2008, 1491-1499.
[7] Datta, T. K. 2010.  Seismic analysis of structures. John Wiley & Sons
[8] Masaeli, H., Khoshnoudian, F., Ziaei, R. 2014. Rocking soil-structure systems subjected to near-fault pulses. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, (accepted).
[9] Park Y.j., Ang A.H-s., Wen Y.K. "Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings", Journal of Structural Engineering, (111), 1985, 740-757.
[10] Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV. "improved shaking damage parameteres for postearthquake applications", proceeding of the SMIP01 seminar on utilization of strong motion data, 2001,  Los Angeles, California. 1-22.
[11] Harden, CH., Hutchinson, T., 2005. Numerical Modeling of the Nonlinear Cyclic Response of Shallow Foundations.  Report No. 504, Earthquake Research Center,University of California, Berkeley, California
[12] Gajan, S., 2007. Numerical Models for Analysis and Performance-Based Design of Shallow Foundations Subjected to Seismic Loading. Report No. 704, Earthquake Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California
[13]Bertero, R. D. and Bertero, V. V. "Performance-based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach". Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., (31), 2002, 627–652