تاثیر تعداد پانلهای بتنی در طرفین ورق فولادی و مقاومت بتن بر رفتار دیوار برشی مرکب

نویسندگان
1 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران
2 کارشناس ارشد سازه از دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران
چکیده
در این مقاله به بررسی عددی اثر تعداد پانل بتنی و همچنین مقاومت بتن مورد استفاده در این پانل بر رفتار لرزه‌ای دیوار برشی مرکب پرداخته شده است. بدین منظور پس از مدلسازی یک نمونه آزمایشگاهی معتبر در نرم‌افزار اجزاء محدودABAQUS و صحت سنجی آن، اثر پارامترهای فوق با ساخت نمونه‌های جدید مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که هرچند استفاده از پانل بتنی در دو طرف ورق منجر به مقاومت بیشتر در تغییرمکان‌های غیرارتجاعی پایین می‌گردد، ولی در نهایت شکل‌پذیری بسیار ضعیف‌تری نسبت به نمونه با بتن در یک طرف حاصل شده و در عین حال مقاومت نهایی در دو حالت تقریباً یکسان خواهد بود. نتایج همچنین گویای تأثیر بسیار اندک مقاومت بتن بر رفتار کلی دیوار برشی مرکب می‌باشد، اگرچه خسارت وارد بر خود پانل بتنی کاهش می‌یابد. براساس نتایج حاصل از این تحقیق می‌توان استفاده از بتن با مقاومت معمولی و فقط در یک طرف ورق فولادی را جهت حصول رفتار لرزه‌ای مطلوب در دیوار برشی مرکب کافی دانست.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Effects of the number of Concrete panel and Concrete strength on the behavior of Composite Shear Wall

نویسنده English

Hamed Ahmadi Taleshian 2
چکیده English

Composite steel plate shear wall -or in short Composite shear wall- is a lateral load resisting system which was investigated widely during past decade. Steel plate is the most important component of the system in carrying shear, but it would buckle under relatively low levels of loading due to its instinct high slenderness. To avoid such a buckling and obtaining a suitable seismic performance, Concrete panel is attached to one or both sides of the plate. The composite performance of the system would be achieved by using shear connectors, usually in the form of bolts when pre-cast concrete is utilized. Surrounding beams and columns act as a framework for the infill composite panel. However, the behavior of theses boundary members together with their connection to shear wall is of main concern, especially in high-seismic design when a dual action is needed and the beam-to-column connection should be rigid. Furthermore, these members would also participate in resisting most of the overturning moments and depends on their stiffness, a portion of the shear. In this paper, the number of concrete panels (whether on one or both sides of steel plate) and Concrete strength are the parameters that their effects on the behavior of composite wall would be investigated numerically. For this purpose, a valid experimental specimen was modeled in the Finite Element Software ABAQUS, with the capability of considering different elements for different parts of the composite system, and after verifying the accuracy of the numerical model, new specimens were constructed and analyzed using push-over method in order to demonstrate the effect of the required parameters. Results show that specimen with concrete on both sides would have considerably less ductile behavior than specimen with one-sided concrete, although its shear strength is higher at lower levels of inelastic displacements. However, both specimens reach the same ultimate shear strength and as was expected, they have also same initial stiffness. Although steel plate is likely to buckle in specimen with concrete on one side of the plate at high levels of stress near yielding, but results of the present paper shows that not only this kind of buckling has no stability sequences and does not result in performance similar to thin steel plate shear walls due to prevention of early buckling, but also leads to a more ductile behavior than the specimen which reaches the full shear yielding without the possibility of such buckling. Furthermore, Concrete strength has little effects on overall behavior of the system, although can reduce the damage to concrete panel. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that using normal-strength concrete (such as 4000psi or 28Mpa) and just on one side of steel plate is sufficient for obtaining a desirable seismic performance of the system.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Composite shear wall
Static Push-over analysis
Finite element
Concrete panel
Buckling
[1] Astaneh-asl A. ؛"Seismic Behavior and Design of Composite Steel Plate Shear Walls"؛ Steel Information and Product Service Report, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, CA, May 2002.
[2] Zhao Q. ؛Experimental and Analytical Studies of Cyclic Behavior of Steel and Composite Shear wall Systems؛ Ph.D Dissertation in Civil and Environmental Engineering, University Of California, Berkeley, Fall 2006.
[3] Rahai A. ؛Hatami F. ؛"Evaluation of composite shear wall behavior under cyclic loadings"؛ Journal of Constructional steel research, 65, 2009, Pgs. 1528-37.
[4] حاتمی، فرزاد؛ ارزیابی عملکرد و مشخصات هندسی بهینه دیوارهای برشی مرکب؛ رساله دروه دکتری، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر تهران، 1384.
 
حاتمی، فرزاد؛ صهری، سید مجیدرضا؛ بررسی تغییرات ضخامت ورق فولادی بر رفتار دیوار برشی مرکب؛ نشریه علمی- پژوهشی سازه و فولاد، سال چهارم، شماره چهارم، پاییز 1387.
[5] Arabzadeh A., Soltani M., Ayazi A. ؛ "Experimental investigation of composite shear walls under shear loadings"؛Thin-walled Structures, 49, 2011, Pgs 842-854. 
[6] ASTM؛ Annual Book of ASTM Standards؛ American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 2000.
[7] ACI 318-08؛ Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete؛ American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, January 2008.
[8] قوامی ماسوله، سید محمد مجید؛ تحلیل غیرخطی ساختمان­های فولادی به روش بارافزون (Pushover) ؛ پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، بهمن ماه 1380.
[9] Yaw Louie L. ؛ "Nonlinear Static- Explicit and Implicit Analysis Example"؛ Walla Walla University, Draft date: May27, 2009.
[10] ATC 40؛Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings؛ Applied Technology Council, Report No. SSC 96-01, November 1996.
[11] ATC 24؛ Guidelines for Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures؛ Applied Technology Council, Report 24, California, 1992.
[12] Seide P.؛ "Compressive Buckling of a Long Simply Supported Plate on an Elastic Foundation", Journal of The Aeronautical Science, 25(6), Pg 382-384, June 1958.
[13] Arabzade A., Moharrami H., Ayazi A. ؛"Local elastic buckling coefficient of steel plates in composite steel plate shear walls"؛ Scientia Iranica, Transactions A : Civil Engineering, Vol 18, Pgs 9-15, 2011.
[14] Guo L., Li R., Rong Q., Zhang S. ؛ "Cyclic behavior of SPSW and CSPSW in composite frame"؛ Thin-walled Structures, 51, 2012, Pgs 39-52.
[15] AISC 341-05 ؛ Seismic provisions for Structural Steel Buildings؛ American Institute of steel construction Inc., Chicago, IL. March 2005.