طراحی لرزه ای سازه ها با استفاده از "روش ضریب رفتار اصلاح شده"

نویسندگان
دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی،
چکیده
چکیده - در حال حاضر، در طراحی لرزهای سازهها از دو روش نیرویی و تغییرمکانی استفاده می شود. اخیراً محققان با ترکیب اجزای دو روش نیرویی و تغییرمکانی، روش سومی با عنوان روش طراحی لرزهای مرکب معرفی کردهاند . هدف از ارائه این مقال ه، است که از ترکیب روش نیرویی استاندارد 2800 و روش « روش ضریب رفتار اصلاحشده » معرفی یک روش مرکب جدید با نام تغییرمکانی نشریه 360 حاصل می شود. در این روش، ضریب رفتار با مشاهده رفتار واقعی سازه و بهره گیری از تحلیل استاتیکی غیرخطی (تحلیل پوشاور) تعیین میگردد. برای ارزیابی روش پیشنهادی، دو قاب فولادی 5 و 7 طبقه، به دو روش نیرویی استاندارد 2800 و روش مرکب ضریب رفتار اصلاح شده، طراحی شده و پاسخ های مختلف آنها مورد مقایسه قرار گرفته است. به دلیل اینکه در بسط تئوری روش مرکب پیشنهادی، از معایب روشهای نیرویی و تغییرمکانی پرهیز شده است، پاسخ های لرزه ای همچون برش پایه طرح و تغییرمکان غیرارتجاعی سازه در این روش با دقت بیشتری تعیین می شود .

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Introduction of “Modified Response Modification Factor Method” for Structural Seismic Design

نویسندگان English

M. Mahmoudi
S. Javadian Fard
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
چکیده English

The traditional procedure for seismic design of building structures has been generally termed the force-based design (FBD) method. In the FBD method, the elastic seismic force acting on the structure is calculated first with the aid of a design acceleration response spectrum. This elastic force is then divided by a reduction factor called behavior factor R, representing the ductility and overstrength capacities of the structures. The implementation of FBD in seismic codes, does not clearly define the performance level. Furthermore, this method assumes the constant behavior factor values for the structures with the similar types of the lateral load resisting systems and do not take into account structure numeral properties same as the influence of the number of stories. These are some disadvantages of the FBD method that have been referred in many researches. So recently, procedures have been developed to substitute for this method. The design procedure would be more rational if the performance of the structure was quantified through a target value of deformation treated as an input variable in the design procedure. This target value of deformation can be assigned to different performance objectives and is the starting point for the development of the rather new displacement-based seismic design (DBD) method and is described in the some guidelines and publications as a performance-based seismic design method. The third and newest seismic design method is called the hybrid force/displacement-based design (HBD) method that adopts the seismic design philosophy based on both the resistance performance-based seismic design method. The third and newest seismic design method is called the hybrid force/displacement-based design (HBD) method that adopts the seismic design philosophy based on both the resistance and the performance. The HFD method combines the best elements of the FBD and DBD methods and tries to avoid those ones, which are usually thought of as disadvantages. This research proposes a new hybrid force/displacement-based seismic design method that is named the modified behavior factor (MBF) method. The MBF method combines the FBD method of the Iranian Earthquake Resistance Design Code (Standard No. 2800) and the DBD method of the Iranian Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (Publication No. 360). Two 5 and 7 story frames with three bays have been seismically designed by the MBF and the FBD methods and the results of them have been compared. The seismic responses of the MBF method are more precise than the responses of the FBD method.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Performance-based seismic design
Force-based design
Displacement-based design
Hybrid-based design
The modified response modification factor method